Check out Half-Life Re-imagined competition results!
Check out Skewing textures in Hammer, our newest tutorial!
Say hello to Daedle, our newest member!

logo

Site Stuff

Reference

Maps

Community

ShoutBOX

Poll

Feeling Blue

What's your favourite shade of blue?

Azure

11

Cobalt

24

Turquoise

7

Cyan

9

Royal

5

Teal

3

Onliners

2 mins

James Luke

5 mins

rufee

6 mins

Unq

8 mins

Striker

8 mins

SourceSkyBoxer

8 mins

Screamernail

11 mins

ZikShadow

Affiliates

A gaming and technology blog by TWHL admins Penguinboy and Ant. A music blog by TWHL users Ant and Hugh.

Map Layout Theory for CS

Page: [1]

Tutorials > General > Intermediate > Map Layout Theory for CS

avatar

By Skals (More from this user)
28th December, 2011
Intermediate
Map layout theory for good gameplay in CS
star star star star star (5 votes)

Map Layout Theory for CS

When creating a counter-strike map there are several things you need to consider in order to achieve good gameplay.

Bomb and Rescue maps

I'd like to start the tutorial by introducing you to some good ways to layout your cs_ and de_ maps.

First, lets take a look at some successful maps.

Tutorial Image de_dust 2

In de_dust2 there are two bomb spots on both sides of the CT spawn, allowing them to choose in which direction to go. It is the same for the T's however it takes them longer to reach the objective, allowing the CT's to set up their defenses / camping locations.
The map has three Clash points, a clash point is an area where both teams are most likely to run into each other, these are areas where most firefights will take place.
There is also a Mid point in the map which can be used to switch between bomb spots or provide support from different angles.

de_dust2 is such a successful map because it allows for fast paced gameplay throughout. The terrorists always have three routes to choose from, and they can always switch around thanks to the mid point. The Clash areas are well balanced, both teams have an equal amount of space and cover.

There are other successful maps that use the exact same theory as de_dust2, like Piranesi.

Tutorial Image de_piranesi

The layout is slightly more complex, but the theory remains the same. There are two sites that the CT's reach first, the T's have three main routes to choose from, and they are able to mix things up thanks to the mid point of the map. Piranesi is also great because both teams have the ability to provide support for the bomb spot from atop or inside the castle.

Hostage rescue maps are slightly different. Italy is a good example of a successful hostage rescue map.

Tutorial Image cs_italy

Again as you can see, the theory is nearly the same. There are three big clash points where the teams usually meet, just like in de_dust2. You are also able to quickly switch sides thanks to the mid point in the map.

It is quite big in size, It can prove to be a nuisance sometimes if playing with less than 12 players, but that's what it's designed for, for big 24-32 player servers.

The only difference in this map to dust2, is that there is only one objective; the hostage rescue point, and that is behind the terrorist spawn. But even though there is only one objective, the map balances itself out by adding three entrances to the terrorist spawn, if there was only one entrance for example it would be nearly impossible to rescue the hostages.

cs_italy and cs_office are both good examples of successful hostage rescue maps.

As you can see from above, almost all successful maps have a similar layout where there are three passages to choose from and a mid point you can use to switch between passages. This is the sole reason why these few maps are so successful compared to others, this method is very good for strategic and fast paced gameplay.

Where to start?

When creating a map, it would be best to first create a layout / overview clearly showing all the paths, objectives and clash points. Making sure early on that your map is laid out properly is important.

What should I do while creating my map?

The pre-release process

Just because your map is layed out nicely wont always mean that gameplay will be good. There can still be some unbalanced areas where one team has an advantage over another, There can be overpowered sniper spots, or areas too close together making long range weapons nearly useless.
To solve these problems you will have to play test your map before you release it. Play testing your map will help you solve small issues you may have not expected or seen while creating your map.

Small arena or skill maps

Arena maps like fy_, 35hp_, aim_, gg_, awp_ are a completely different deal. Usually very small maps, having no strategic gameplay what so ever. Still, there are some things you can keep in mind to make the maps just a bit better:

Comments

avatar Daubster says: star star star star star 28th December 2011, 14:52 PM
While I don't completely agree with some of the maps you've mentioned working really well, you've covered it all in great depth, nice stuff.
avatar DiscoStu says: star star star star star 28th December 2011, 23:07 PM
I agree with Daubster. I.e Italy works for the analysis, but doesn't work well in my opinion. It's big and slow. Other than that, the important points of mapping are all covered and it's a good analysis.
avatar Captain Terror says: star star star star star 29th December 2011, 02:48 AM
Thank you fwend! this definitley helps me out for c32!
avatar Skals says: 29th December 2011, 09:55 AM
I had to give some kind of analysis for a hostage rescue map, Italy and office are the two best hostage rescue maps.
avatar Skals says: 29th December 2011, 09:56 AM
Italy is infact very successful and fast paced, if played on a server of 32 people. Obviously if you play it with 5 other people it will be too big for you.
avatar zeeba-G says: 30th December 2011, 08:24 AM
Thanks for the good pointers. This is the kind of thinking that goes into good maps. With halflife I think a lot about movement i.e gauss and longjump etc. Counterstrike has its own unique features to think about.
avatar Stojke says: star star star star star 30th December 2011, 09:00 AM
I would like to add that you must not have many ways and directions, as often players have no idea where are they going. Both teams should have an equal balanced amount of directions at which they can go.
Too many may cause unbalanced gameplay and confusion among players.
Also, some of the very best maps have places out side and inside buildings, like de_nuke that has a below level, big yard and a building.
Combining these things can result into a great map that is fun to play and has quick game paste.
avatar RabidMonkey says: star star star 6th January 2012, 02:09 AM
Some good points about specifics for CS gameplay (clash zones, objective runups etc) - Stojke makes a good point about limiting your routes and I think you could have touched more on general layout theory and how it ties into CS, (i.e. how the popular maps are generally built around a simple series of loops, or a figure-8 layout) perhaps even dissected a round of a popular map like Dust in detail to truly examine how the gameplay works in an actual round. Overall you have some good tips, but general layout theory is equally as important as taking into account the CS specifics!
avatar xzec says: 26th February 2012, 00:58 AM
Another great read: http://www.johnsto.co.uk/design/making_dust2
You must be logged in to comment.