Clean up.
If you ever
Forum posts
Yay!
f/4?!
I'm more and more in love with my EF 50mm/1.8.
Next up, I'm coming after it's tele'er brother the EF 85mm/1.8.
I'm more and more in love with my EF 50mm/1.8.
Next up, I'm coming after it's tele'er brother the EF 85mm/1.8.
So what lens you got?
What's the problem with autofocus? You just have to learn to use it.
What's the problem with autofocus? You just have to learn to use it.
Is the Kazaa network still up?
My guess is multiple light_spots with the "Is sky" flag, with different but almost identical angles.
It's a great idea.
It's a great idea.
whereas a EOS camera will take all current autofocus lensesNot necessarily. APS-C and APS-H can take both EF and EF-S mount lenses, but full frame cameras are only compatible with EF mount lenses.
EOS was introduced in 1987 IIRC, and all FD mount models were discontinued by 1989. It was Nikon that introduced autofocus systems a few years earlier.
The only current full-frame models by Canon are the 1D and 5D, which cost upwards of $5000 and $2500 respectively.
Also all Canons have been EOS since 1989.
I'm not going into detail as it's not like you can't learn this from anybody else but me, but sensor size does indirectly have an effect on depth of field. You may or may not use that to your advantage when taking photos.
I'm sure I've posted this before, but you can take a look at this baby again:
Canon EF 1200mm/5.6L USM
Also all Canons have been EOS since 1989.
I'm not going into detail as it's not like you can't learn this from anybody else but me, but sensor size does indirectly have an effect on depth of field. You may or may not use that to your advantage when taking photos.
I'm sure I've posted this before, but you can take a look at this baby again:
Canon EF 1200mm/5.6L USM
Crollo, a T2i is not full frame.
Holding a good camera for any length of time doesn't make you less of a pedantic ass, so no.
I think he actually wants the password to be different (i.e randomly generated by code at run time) on every playthrough.
I'm almost sure that it can't be done without custom code.
I'm almost sure that it can't be done without custom code.
Order it online 
Some Canon products have had their prices raised ever since the Tsunami+Earthquake+Volcano Eruption+Nuclear Meltdown in Japan. Probably because some Canon factory was flooded, cracked in half, filled with lava and then irradiated, it won't be running for some time while they clean up and/or set up a new plant somewhere else. For the reason Daubster mentioned, products already produced are more expensive - not because it's more expensive to produce new ones, it's because they're producing them at a reduced rate or even not producing them at all.
Tough luck, I know.
Tough luck, I know.
And likes to take naps on his rocking chair on the front deck of his countryside shack while chewing on a wheat straw and hugging his shotgun?
I like the last one.
Crollo? Long time no see. Been on banholiday?
You ARE special, in a Ralph Wiggum kind of way.
At least it's covered by warranty. You don't lose anything.
D70s are ok. But I'm still on the Canon team
D70s are ok. But I'm still on the Canon team
Crikey!
...
...do I qualify?
...
...do I qualify?
You can do impulse 106 (or 107, not sure) if you have the map.
If you don't... well... look! A cow! runs
If you don't... well... look! A cow! runs
He did make the image wider, didn't he?
You can be struck by lightning??
I did a singleplayer playtest not too long ago. I saw a strange white thing and thought, "wtf, is that a cat?" - turns out it was a wild dog. A pack of them.
I wanted to go get my junk after I respawned, but I was completely unable to find the place. Instead, I got killed again by an exploding walking cactus.
This game is WEIRD.
I did a singleplayer playtest not too long ago. I saw a strange white thing and thought, "wtf, is that a cat?" - turns out it was a wild dog. A pack of them.
I wanted to go get my junk after I respawned, but I was completely unable to find the place. Instead, I got killed again by an exploding walking cactus.
This game is WEIRD.
if you use the seed 1027748776332260843Did you casually come across that number?
I also think you misunderstood my previous post. And also completely missed its point.
Indeed looking good! Moar!
Video. Through the viewfinder of a photo camera. I think you misunderstood the concept of using DSLRs to shoot video.
What the fuck. Seriously, what the fuck.
I liked those photos as they were, without that gross overdone contrast.
I'm not even going to argue with you.
I liked those photos as they were, without that gross overdone contrast.
I'm not even going to argue with you.
That's because you're taking them wrong. I've posted plenty of straight-out-of-the-camera photos that are just perfect - look at page 10 for example. I suggest you first learn the basics of photography instead of attacking me for trying to help you.
I'll just stop arguing with you about photography, it's pointless.
I'll just stop arguing with you about photography, it's pointless.
I can't decide whether you're trolling or just being stupid. You can see lighting, angle, framing, DOF, and everything right from the viewfinder - that's what it's there for. The only thing it doesn't show you is the final exposure. But you still have the built-in light meter as a guide for that. Taking a photo of the viewfinder won't show you the final exposure either.
Also, $15 a roll? Don't complain. There's cheap film for less than $5 so you can use that for practicing. Good film can cost over $100.
[edit] Ninja edit eh? Still you don't have to pay for full-sized copies of all shots. That's what contact sheets are for.
Also, $15 a roll? Don't complain. There's cheap film for less than $5 so you can use that for practicing. Good film can cost over $100.
[edit] Ninja edit eh? Still you don't have to pay for full-sized copies of all shots. That's what contact sheets are for.
You could, of course, look through the viewfinder as a speedier procedure to obtain the exact same information.
Decent practice shots. I hope you do start using film rather than shooting digital photos through the viewfinder. It's more pleasing to do so. And then there's the mystery of not knowing whether your photos came out good until you develop the film. Do you know how that works? Developing? Or maybe you're too young for that?
...oh.
Didn't know about that feature.
Didn't know about that feature.
Oh right. Too lazy to actually save them to my HDD when my browser can display them full-size correctly
I hadn't seen a WinZip icon in like a decade.
But you also have WinRAR simultaneously, which is slightly puzzling.
Btw, I like Zeeba's.
But you also have WinRAR simultaneously, which is slightly puzzling.
Btw, I like Zeeba's.
So what sort of camera shot these?
Great shots indeed.
I hope you start making good use of it and stop posting crap pictures that look all alike. No offense of course.
You stole Dobson's Canon FT?
Crollo, you have no excuse.
@Brendanmint: Try higher ASA film, to make shorter exposures
@Brendanmint: Try higher ASA film, to make shorter exposures
</discussion>
You could get a Canon AT-1 for less than $100. I'd love to have one myself, and I'll get one as soon as I can spare $100.
TL;DR.
You don't even have a SLR, you have no reason to care about that anyway. Don't be a troll.
Maybe he's trying to implement some sort of HL2-screen-field-gate. In which case I don't know how it's done. Probably impossible in HL1 without custom code.
Other then the proprietary mount that isn't usable on other cameras via adapters, nothing.That also happens with Canon, Nikon, Leica, Pentax, Hasselblad, Voigtländer, and pretty much any SLR brand you can think of.
I suppose I'll have to. Something is expected of me!
I guess I'll find the time to do something.
I guess I'll find the time to do something.
Doesn't a clip brush do exactly this?
Never tried it, but at least I used to think that's the reason behind the existence of func_monsterclip.
Never tried it, but at least I used to think that's the reason behind the existence of func_monsterclip.
What's wrong with Minolta lenses?
Can make: Goldsrc
Can receive: both
But, still a maybe. My situation can be turned upside down at any time, so I don't think I could be expected to do much. Maybe if I'm able to make something it can be sent as an "extra" for a random receiver?
Can receive: both
But, still a maybe. My situation can be turned upside down at any time, so I don't think I could be expected to do much. Maybe if I'm able to make something it can be sent as an "extra" for a random receiver?
I have the feeling you have already posted the second one before.