Some TWHLers have posted amazing outdoor photos in this thread.
Yeah, with their +400$ DSLRs. I am on a useless piece of shit point and shoot Kodak Easyshare, it has absolutely no manual ANYTHING so to speak of, and point and shoots are usually aimed at people who want everything in focus god knows why.
Yes, I used that image on purpose, if you don't get the point I'm expressing then let me put it simply: I dislike outdoor shots because I can't control ANYTHING. I am on a generic point and shoot with no manual focus and I dislike the idea of taking a picture going "Ok well I'm focusing on this object right here, but I hope that the person viewing this is actually going to look at it [assumingly first] and not look at random things in the background",
You ever notice how dark and grungy my macro's are?
They are for a reason. I'm not just pointing a light at my object because then you'd see the table perfectly lit. And then you would be looking at the table, not the subject. With the macro shots I have perfect control over my lighting and I can separate the subject from the background perfectly fine. In broad daylight and sunlight, I have absolutely nothing to separate the subject from the background. No manual focus, absolutely nothing. It's a generic point and shoot camera, it's not meant for photography, I'm just lucky enough to get it to work alright with macro shots.
Also Striker, if I don't earn money in the bloody first place, how the hell am I going to 'save' money?
That's a pretty good price though, I would have sworn I'd price the camera over 400, considering the prices.
Fuck it, perhaps I should just sell my 360 for around 200, might at least get something better then the point-and-shoot I got right now at least.
And no, I do not take photography seriously, it's something I do, not something I get payed to do. I'm not an elitist, just a guy with a camera, otherwise I'd have proper equipment.