Okay you're warned, film SLR fanatic rant inbound.
I was always under the impression that a DSLR is supposed to be a SLR but with a digital imaging sensor instead of film. There are certain sacrafices that would have to be made such as a LCD screen for review and troubleshooting etc of course, but one thing I never could understand for the life of me is what possible good reason could they EVER have for removing the shutter speed and ISO dials!? (And indirectly the exp comp dial) It's all the same as making lenses out of plastic and removing the aperture dial and focusing scale!
Their presence could not possibly interfere with further progress of the camera, could they? Was it truly necessary to remove all these useful dials and replace them with a shitty hollow plastic do-it-all-through-500-menus dial?
Well, maybe I'm not entirely crazy, because Nikon has decided it's not right either: Yes, that is a DSLR with a shutter speed, ISO and Exposure Compensation dial. The lens doesn't have a aperture dial, but if you want high build quality you can always pick up a manual focus lens because they still work on newer Nikons.
I know this is a newer generation of 'ooh-shiny', but I can't be the only one who cares about this stuff, right? Right?
Maybe I just have too much passion and come across as a pedantic control freak. Whatever, I'm just happy that somebody else acknowledged it and decided to do something about it.