Sorry if I'm getting repetitive with the whole automobile photography stuff.
Forum posts
Looks more like a laughing cat then a smiling one. That or he's taking a shit.
Sorry if I'm getting repetitive with the whole automobile photography stuff.
Sorry if I'm getting repetitive with the whole automobile photography stuff.
After the 2010 update all of the 'useless weapons' were useful enough. I actually used the fucking UMP once, and didn't immediately die.
Thanks. 
Another night, another bone chilling experience.
That's it, all the other photos turned out worth shit. Low resolution LCD is starting to irritate me.
Another night, another bone chilling experience.
Thanks, my dad's F250.
The two I use are Adobe Imageready that used to ship with old versions of photoshop, and the now integrated animation functions built into photoshop. I prefer imageready to be honest.
The two I use are Adobe Imageready that used to ship with old versions of photoshop, and the now integrated animation functions built into photoshop. I prefer imageready to be honest.
The people who do these surgeries are trained professionals. You'll be fine.
The hell, I didn't even mess with the white balance on that one. Updated, excuse the poor job I can't change jpg white balance too well.
I think my product photography is improving.
I think my product photography is improving.
No not those two shots, it was completely dry out. I went out a couple weeks ago and took a bunch of shots [was out for an hour] but only ended up posting three.
Attempt at night shots:Was drenching rain, even with a sweater and a leather jacket on I still got soaked to the bone, my equipment got completely drenched yet still functions perfectly. Also keep in mind despite the sky appearing light blue it was completely pitch black outside. [I had to work with a flashlight.]
Neither the TWHL or The Snarkpit's staff are barbaric or uncivilized enough to actually care or do anything about you cross-posting images or links.
The CRT screen heats it self up.I want a laptop that has a CRT screen.
Problem is the server doesn't successfully start at all so he can't open console.
sv_lan should not default to 0 on a listen server, try deleting your config files.
sv_lan should not default to 0 on a listen server, try deleting your config files.
There are plugins to support .smd formats but I don't recommend using them, it's best to do your modelling inside of 3ds Max, and then all the skeletal\compiling work in Milkshape. Much cleaner and better process in my opinion.
Not without protection, Bruce!
i didnt mean it like that, i meant.... Half the members on the forum will get banned because half the members on the forum take shots at Dimbark....Well, yes. That's what I meant, I just couldn't figure out how to word it other then 'getting banned' so I used disappearing.
Its not like we have the physical presence on the internet to tell ages.Sure but he did state his age on several occasions, but then again I'm not sure you're active [or even lurking] enough to have caught them.
What the hell is wrong with you people? Soup Miner has a very good point - the majority of us here used to do all sorts of silly stuff in their first years. I know I did.What are you suggesting, that the community of TWHL should be civilized and constructive? Such a ridiculous notion!
Any more uncalled-for Dimbark bashing anywhere on this site will instantly result in bans.
If a someone honestly trying to be creative is something you just can't stomach, then you can fuck right off, right now.
I agree with 99 though, I somehow feel half the entire community disappearing as a result of this ruling.
Replaying through the original Half-Lifelol no levelling system what a gay game
Episode 3 will never get released!Pff that's a ridiculous statement.
"opp4"
Opposing penis forces... Lesbians?
Opposing penis forces... Lesbians?
I do remember you, but if I find something to be IQ dropping I don't care who made it, I'll react the same way.
I could almost feel my IQ drop a couple dozen points.
i see what you did the
Nice Rim, how does the lower barrel fire?
I need proof for Dimbark's mother.
I had it out in pissing rain for an entire hour and the only problem I ran into was that I ran out of battery power, everything functions perfectly. I'm unconcerned about how it handles getting wet, it's a professional grade DSLR.
Besides, it's Canada. What am I supposed to do?
Besides, it's Canada. What am I supposed to do?
First attempts at HDR imagery:
I know they aren't particularly great, but my camera only supports bracketing of one EV, and I'm far too lazy to manually take more shots.
Attempt at night shots:
Was drenching rain, even with a sweater and a leather jacket on I still got soaked to the bone, my equipment got completely drenched yet still functions perfectly. Also keep in mind despite the sky appearing light blue it was completely pitch black outside.
Attempt at night shots:
Well, if I had access to the T2i personally I would definitely try to get some betterdiferent comparisons, but unfortunately I can only mess with it extremely briefly, can't take it outside or anything.
I just felt the compulsion to do a on-the-spot comparison after the T2i took the shittiest conditions possible and gave me a great image [With the exception of noise], the E10 took a lot more fucking around with but I still got there in the end. That's what matters, right?
I just felt the compulsion to do a on-the-spot comparison after the T2i took the shittiest conditions possible and gave me a great image [With the exception of noise], the E10 took a lot more fucking around with but I still got there in the end. That's what matters, right?
The point I was making was that you're comparing actually viewing an image to pixel peeping, 4x6 is to the standard forum size of 500 pixels, and a 20x30 is like viewing the images at 100%.
I'm not comparing technical specs, the T2i obviously has higher ISO ratings, better MP counts, it's OBVIOUSLY going to win. My point is to say that you don't need expensive technology to output good PICTURES. If you want to pixel peep you're missing my point of comparison. So yes, I am comparing aesthetics and not literal image quality like ISO and resolution.
At first watching you flip shit over nothing because you intentionally twist my words and mis-comprehend everything I say was slightly humorous at first, but damn you have problems. Have I directly aimed an insult at you with that post? Why do you feel the need to do so to me when I haven't said shit to you?
I'm not comparing technical specs, the T2i obviously has higher ISO ratings, better MP counts, it's OBVIOUSLY going to win. My point is to say that you don't need expensive technology to output good PICTURES. If you want to pixel peep you're missing my point of comparison. So yes, I am comparing aesthetics and not literal image quality like ISO and resolution.
At first watching you flip shit over nothing because you intentionally twist my words and mis-comprehend everything I say was slightly humorous at first, but damn you have problems. Have I directly aimed an insult at you with that post? Why do you feel the need to do so to me when I haven't said shit to you?
Every single image on this entire forum get's resized to 500 pixels wide and yet you seem to have been able to evaluate images, perfectly fine.
So why do you need to see individual pixels to see my 'point'? Regardless of however many pixels you started with, they all get downsized to the forum.
So why do you need to see individual pixels to see my 'point'? Regardless of however many pixels you started with, they all get downsized to the forum.
Sorry, I misunderstood you. I was only comparing the first two images [The Olympus picture was taken by the T2i, T2i shot taken by the Olympus.], the rest are only the Olympus. Although, with that said, which did you think was which? 
It's not exactly easy to take a picture of the camera you're using unless you use a mirror or a second camera. Unfortunately a mirror is extremely unfeasible and I don't have enough money or resources to get a T2i and another E-10.
The results are from both cameras, read the EXIF data.
The results are from both cameras, read the EXIF data.
Love the PP on the second image, Striker.
Which is better, the T2i
or the Olympus?
Of course the T2i raped the Olympus [Other then noise, but that's only because it was at 3200 ISO], but I'm quite impressed by the results of the Olympus. Both cameras were placed in the exact same spot, identical lighting conditions.
Yeah I know I said I'd try to find interesting shit. I didn't. 
[Mostly got traffic shots]
Which is better, the T2i
[Mostly got traffic shots]The circles image had lots of dead space at the bottom I cropped off, I couldn't touch the second one's framing, nowhere to crop.
Got some CF cards so now I can actually use the camera I've had for several weeks. Unfortunately it's too late to sensibly shoot anything outside [no tripod] so I just messed with the camera.
Fucked up right away.
Then tried to push the camera's low light capabilities...
Considering how dark it was outside and that it's a 12 year old camera, I'm pretty happy with the results. I'll get out tomorrow and try to find something interesting.
Fucked up right away.
Then tried to push the camera's low light capabilities...
Considering how dark it was outside and that it's a 12 year old camera, I'm pretty happy with the results. I'll get out tomorrow and try to find something interesting.
I personally don't understand the taste issue, granted I've pretty much only drank 2 cups worth coffee (black with nothing in them), but I don't understand how it tastes bad. Didn't really help me stay awake or anything, just made me need to piss really badly.
I think he made a custom order, but didn't physically assemble it himself.
Separate players from the map, onto a different video layer. I want to blur the background which is very tedious keyframe work, but very easy greenscreen work.
I could replace every texture the map uses but that's extremely tedious work, especially for more then one map and I'm wondering if there is any simple 'override textures' tool like with 3ds max.
I'm trying to do some greenscreen work in CS:S and I want to do it on a existing map but here's the problem:
I can't figure out a easy way to take every texture in the map and replace it with a singular [green] texture, short of decompiling the map and actually doing it manually... I can't take a demo from one map and play it on another so I can't decompile the map.
I can't figure out a easy way to take every texture in the map and replace it with a singular [green] texture, short of decompiling the map and actually doing it manually... I can't take a demo from one map and play it on another so I can't decompile the map.
It totals 7,999 polygons with the suppressor, and 3,193 without the suppressor. It's for my current position in Project Earth, as one of the 3D artists.
It takes a heft of polygons as I hate manifold modelling with a passion:
It takes a heft of polygons as I hate manifold modelling with a passion:
Almost done.
Personally, I think if this was genuinely functional or even legit, a lot of development companies would have invested in it already.I think this comment summed it up pretty well:
"The gaming/computer technology industry does the following: They basically take a bag of chips and sell it piece by piece, every year, instead of the whole bag at once. This metod is extremely profitable, as you all know, so it's not in their interest to give us all at once."
It does make a difference to people with low end machines. You're comparing something that's been completely optimized for low end machines to something that is designed to be run on high end machines with the option of lowering the settings. It's not the same thing.
That being said you're going to have to come onto a reasonable compromise, you could try going for highest fps, but then you'd have quake I era graphics... Nobody's saying you have to make Crysis level graphics... Just don't create quake level graphics either.
That being said you're going to have to come onto a reasonable compromise, you could try going for highest fps, but then you'd have quake I era graphics... Nobody's saying you have to make Crysis level graphics... Just don't create quake level graphics either.
I had a FT QL yes, and I shot about 8-9 rolls but I then traded it for a Rebel G, I only traded it for the one and only reason being it had a EF mount.
I understand what you mean, all I've posted here is just shit from my Kodak, but honestly, without actually seeing pictures, think about it. If I didn't have the technological skills required to justify purchasing a DSLR, would I really have survived 8 rolls of film through a fully manual camera?
I understand what you mean, all I've posted here is just shit from my Kodak, but honestly, without actually seeing pictures, think about it. If I didn't have the technological skills required to justify purchasing a DSLR, would I really have survived 8 rolls of film through a fully manual camera?
The problem is that I can't find a good lighting formula for this short tunnel. I already tried combining 2 sets of lights( a yellowish one and a orangeish one), and lowered the lightmap scale to 4. Have any suggestions?Yeah sure, look at a real underground tunnel similar to yours and base it off that.
I fucking hate my dad. thanks for not getting me a iphone like i fucking asked for, BITCH. #FUCKDAD
Why would you teach that? You horrible person.
Very nice, have any in 4:3 and 5:4?
The blue Christmas globe would be great if it didn't have a quarter of an inch worth of DOF. :/
The blue Christmas globe would be great if it didn't have a quarter of an inch worth of DOF. :/