Created 12 years ago2007-06-13 10:00:07 UTC by espen180

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-13 20:39:21 UTC
Post #225170

Obviously, espen's calculator can.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 00:19:09 UTC
Post #225182

Lol maths. Ever hear of grahams number?

Lets get a bigger number, by 500000 orders of magnitude

My contempt for you all is tangable

Lets get a bigger number, by 500000 orders of magnitude

My contempt for you all is tangable

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 02:01:02 UTC
Post #225184

My contempt for you all is tangableThis thread is going off on a tangent.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 02:08:12 UTC
Post #225185

Meanwhile Cosine and Sine weep in the corner.

I KNO SUM MATSH!!!

I KNO SUM MATSH!!!

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 03:12:09 UTC
Post #225186

dont forget about sec, cosec and cot!

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 05:42:00 UTC
Post #225191

This thread is going off on a tangent.I can't believe I laughed at that.

Rimrook, n/0 is undefined, not infinity. The graph of n/x has a discontinuity at x=0.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 07:36:33 UTC
Post #225193

There is no way I am ever going to post a math problem here for help, ever.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 08:16:44 UTC
Post #225195

n/0 is undefined, not infinity.QFT.

In other news, I just did a Maths Exam today.

So can anybody tell me what the answer is of:

I think we had to simplify it,

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 08:43:50 UTC
Post #225203

I suck at math. i'm out.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 08:44:17 UTC
Post #225204

Same, except I might just keep posting for the lulz.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 09:40:11 UTC
Post #225205

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 09:56:18 UTC
Post #225206

lol I thought everyone would go home (from school or otherwise) to relax, not start doing more problems -_-

But while Im here I mise well post a problem:

If**csc? = .4534** then what is the angle? What quadrant is it in?

But while Im here I mise well post a problem:

If

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 10:17:15 UTC
Post #225207

So can anybody tell me what the answer is of:1/(1/a+1/b)

(a^-1 + b^-1)^-1

I think we had to simplify it,

and whatever that simplifies too, I forgot from there since I did algrebra so long ago, cant be arsed to remember.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 10:25:42 UTC
Post #225209

That can't be simplified any further, can it?

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 10:26:03 UTC
Post #225210

If csc? = .4534 then what is the angle? What quadrant is it in?There's no answer, .4534 doesn't fit into csc's range. The resulting value must be greater than or equal to 1, or less than or equal to -1.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 10:44:32 UTC
Post #225213

Mappers need to be good at geometry, at the least.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 10:46:08 UTC
Post #225214

Agreed.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 10:47:21 UTC
Post #225215

...Is that why I fail?

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 11:07:09 UTC
Post #225218

Stupid. It's pretty damn obvious why you can't devide by zero.

You fail as much as Jimmi did when he tried to convinse me this:

1 + 1 = 1.

He had a really looong and really stupid equation....

You fail as much as Jimmi did when he tried to convinse me this:

1 + 1 = 1.

He had a really looong and really stupid equation....

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 11:22:24 UTC
Post #225219

Technicaly, one divided by zero equals infinity, because you have to add zero to itself an infinite amount of times until you reach one.

It's the same with two.

Infinity doesn't go by the same rules as normal numbers, as two different infinities could be either the same or different.

So Espens post is wrong.

About Cabooses equation-

9.999 - 0.9999 = 8.9991

8.999 / 9 = 0.9999

If by 0.999... he means that it goes on forever, then it has the same problem as Espens post- Infinity doesn't go by the same rules as normal numbers.

It's the same with two.

Infinity doesn't go by the same rules as normal numbers, as two different infinities could be either the same or different.

So Espens post is wrong.

About Cabooses equation-

9.999 - 0.9999 = 8.9991

8.999 / 9 = 0.9999

If by 0.999... he means that it goes on forever, then it has the same problem as Espens post- Infinity doesn't go by the same rules as normal numbers.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-14 15:30:15 UTC
Post #225243

There is no way I am ever going to post a math problem here for help, ever.^^

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 04:33:32 UTC
Post #225280

Slasher

simplified

(ab)/(a+b)

simplified

(ab)/(a+b)

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 05:42:30 UTC
Post #225281

Take the hard or the easy one.

The goal is to find the values of x, y and z. The three have the same values on both difficulties.

```
xy^2 = 48
xyz = 84
xzy^2 = 336
```

```
x + y^2 = 19
x + y + z = 14
x + y^2 + z = 26
```

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 07:00:15 UTC
Post #225289

hard

x=3

y=4

z=7

easy

x=10

y=-3

z=7

not really a logic based challenge, since its just a regular substitution question. also all three dont have the same values in both questions

x=3

y=4

z=7

easy

x=10

y=-3

z=7

not really a logic based challenge, since its just a regular substitution question. also all three dont have the same values in both questions

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 07:00:54 UTC
Post #225290

Wow seriously what math did you come from people? Go back to second grade. You cannot divide by zero, it is undefined! You just can't do it. It's not infinity, it's not 0, it's a "0" with a lin through it. Got it? good.

Also, I'm surprised you all debated espen's equation for so long, being as the only problem he was having was basic order of operations...oh yeah and simple knowledge of NOT DIVIDING BY ZERO

Also, I'm surprised you all debated espen's equation for so long, being as the only problem he was having was basic order of operations...oh yeah and simple knowledge of NOT DIVIDING BY ZERO

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 07:13:36 UTC
Post #225291

i just discovered that the 'easy' problem has 2 answers. be careful next time you make this stuff up, espen.

also, are you still going on about dividing by zero? listen to vox if you cant read what i said on the last page.

also, learn to maths TJB

a=0.99999........(RECURRING TO INFINITY)

10a=9.99999........(RECURRING TO INFINITY)

10a-a=9.99999........(RECURRING)-0.99999........(RECURRING)

9a=9

a=1

this is a PROVEN MATHEMATICAL CONCEPT. ANY RECURRING NUMBER CAN BE RATIONALIZED THIS WAY. FOR EXAMPLE:

x=0.146146146146146....(recurring)...note that recurring digits are 146

1000x=146.146146...(recurring)

1000x-x=99x=146

x=146/999

try it. type 146/999 into a calculator.

0.99999...recurring to infinity = 1.

in summary

you ABSOLUTELY NO WAY IN HELL can (no really, NEVER EVER EVER) divide ANYTHING AT ALL by zero.

NOTHING. x/0 where x is an element of I or R or 0 or anything is UNDEFINED. 1!=2. end of story. seriously.

and

0.9999999999.....(RECURRING TO INFINITY. IN-FUCKING-FINITY) = 1. there are no mathematical arguments. none. it is not disputed. it is correct.

0.9999999...recurring = 3*0.3333333....recurring

0.333333333333...recurring = 1/3

3*1/3 = 1

EQUALS ONE.

NOW SHUT THE FUCK UP.

also, are you still going on about dividing by zero? listen to vox if you cant read what i said on the last page.

also, learn to maths TJB

a=0.99999........(RECURRING TO INFINITY)

10a=9.99999........(RECURRING TO INFINITY)

10a-a=9.99999........(RECURRING)-0.99999........(RECURRING)

9a=9

a=1

this is a PROVEN MATHEMATICAL CONCEPT. ANY RECURRING NUMBER CAN BE RATIONALIZED THIS WAY. FOR EXAMPLE:

x=0.146146146146146....(recurring)...note that recurring digits are 146

1000x=146.146146...(recurring)

1000x-x=99x=146

x=146/999

try it. type 146/999 into a calculator.

0.99999...recurring to infinity = 1.

in summary

you ABSOLUTELY NO WAY IN HELL can (no really, NEVER EVER EVER) divide ANYTHING AT ALL by zero.

NOTHING. x/0 where x is an element of I or R or 0 or anything is UNDEFINED. 1!=2. end of story. seriously.

and

0.9999999999.....(RECURRING TO INFINITY. IN-FUCKING-FINITY) = 1. there are no mathematical arguments. none. it is not disputed. it is correct.

0.9999999...recurring = 3*0.3333333....recurring

0.333333333333...recurring = 1/3

3*1/3 = 1

EQUALS ONE.

NOW SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 11:19:03 UTC
Post #225312

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 16:23:43 UTC
Post #225345

Actually, if you use correct mathematical notation, 1!=2 is incorrect. 1!=1x1=1.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 16:36:54 UTC
Post #225349

So what?! Why is it so impossible to divide by zero?!

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 18:34:24 UTC
Post #225357

easyThat's another solution, but I'll show you that I was also correct:

x=10

y=-3

z=7

Here's your answer:

```
x + y^2 = 19
x + y + z = 14
x + y^2 + z = 26
```

Now let's convert that into numbers:
```
10 + -3^2 = 19
10 + -3 + 7 = 14
10 + -3^2 + 7 = 26
```

Here's mine:
```
3 + 4^2 = 19
3 + 4 + 7 = 14
3 + 4^2 + 7 = 26
```

So you can't say the values aren't the same, but you
Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 18:46:38 UTC
Post #225359

i meant "!=" as the programming notation "not equal"

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 20:40:01 UTC
Post #225361

‫‬‭‮҉this thread is dumber than monkeys. You may ask how big of a monkey? Well, it's a pretty big monkey.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-15 21:57:19 UTC
Post #225362

i think you screwed it up.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-16 11:30:31 UTC
Post #225386

Did I?

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-16 13:09:47 UTC
Post #225395

screw math

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-16 13:17:00 UTC
Post #225401

(6)

(2) = 15. Ponder your minds on that.

(2) = 15. Ponder your minds on that.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-16 20:11:04 UTC
Post #225431

take one of the 2 and one off the 6 :>

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-18 01:05:18 UTC
Post #225530

Expand: (a+b)

(.a.+.b.)

(..a..+..b..)

(...a...+...b...)

(....a....+....b....)

As you can see, I'm great at maths.

EDIT: DAMN SPACE FIXING.

(.a.+.b.)

(..a..+..b..)

(...a...+...b...)

(....a....+....b....)

As you can see, I'm great at maths.

EDIT: DAMN SPACE FIXING.

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-18 01:30:36 UTC
Post #225531

thats pathetically stolen from this image

also its expand (a+b)^n

also its expand (a+b)^n

Posted 12 years ago2007-06-18 01:33:34 UTC
Post #225532

Bah, I knew I got it from somewhere. ;P

You must be logged in to post a response.