Journal #6355

Posted 14 years ago2010-01-28 10:05:01 UTC

12 Comments

Commented 14 years ago2010-01-28 10:48:30 UTC Comment #39057
incorrect use of the semicolon, dialing interpolice...

)

Commented 14 years ago2010-01-28 10:50:30 UTC Comment #39050
Super-sized iPod Touch. Pass.
Commented 14 years ago2010-01-28 14:37:39 UTC Comment #39051
And it's way over-priced, way underpowered, and doesn't support flash.
and it's a mac. - Boo

I kinda want it but i really wouldn't get one.
Commented 14 years ago2010-01-28 16:31:12 UTC Comment #39052
One application at a time? Wow, back into windows 3.1 times.
No USB support?
Apple has full control over what applications you have?

Fuck you, Apple.
Commented 14 years ago2010-01-28 17:19:16 UTC Comment #39056
That seems like useless shit to me.
Commented 14 years ago2010-01-28 18:19:54 UTC Comment #39058
.....and yet with everything bad about it said here and on other countless forums all over the web, Apple is going to end up selling millions of them anyway, people will be standing in lines for hours, just like they did for the iPhone. In less than 60 days, the madness starts all over again.
Commented 14 years ago2010-01-28 18:37:36 UTC Comment #39055
Indeed, millions will sell, it's basically just a big iPod touch, yet no one I know agrees with me. Can you install from a CD? Noooo. Can you use an external HDD? Noooo. Does it suck dick? Yeeessss.

Maximum storage size w/ Wifi + 3G? 64GB, $829.

iPod touch's have 64GB storage available now.
Commented 14 years ago2010-01-28 18:59:38 UTC Comment #39060
So it gives blowjobs? It can't be so bad then :P
Commented 14 years ago2010-01-28 19:44:21 UTC Comment #39053
For $600-800 you could get a fairly awesome netboo-.. ON WAIT IS THAT AN OVERSIZED PALM PC WITH THE APPLE LOGO ON IT?! buys

Honestly though, I can't see how you'd get $800 of functionality out of this one. It's too huge to be a palm PC, which puts it in the netbook category (..eh?), where it's basically nothing. I wouldn't have been surprised to see a slightly bigger palm PC version of the iPhone, running some mobile OSX ver., but this just doesn't make sense. Not to mention no multitasking, even the iPhone can do it.

Weird move, Apple. Not that it's not going to sell though. Fuckin' macfags.

EDIT: Lol'd. Using phrases like "internet dork" and "work mode" takes the cake.
Commented 14 years ago2010-01-28 19:54:02 UTC Comment #39061
Ive never liked apple, as crappy as it is, im still a windows guy, i already got around itunes on my ipod. stupid assple. ass+apple=assple.

EDIT:
also, the prices are outrageous....who the crap would spend that much for that piece of shit?
Commented 14 years ago2010-01-28 23:48:05 UTC Comment #39059
Who the crap would spend that much for that piece of shit you ask?

Oh a few,.....the same millions of Apple minions who bought the iTouch and iPhone.
Commented 14 years ago2010-01-29 05:50:15 UTC Comment #39054
Fact of the matter is, the iPhone was actually great for a phone. It had all the necessary functions of a 3G device, and more, plus the excessive amount of apps made it highly customizable for whatever needs you have. I probably would've gotten one myself if I didn't prefer having all my gadgets (phone, mp3 player, camera, etc.) as separate entities, not an all-in-one
monstrosity, or didn't mind touchscreens in general.

The ipad, however, does not perform any task better than your average netbook. Hell, even the fanboys are running out of things to say in its defence. Some of the arguments from the macfag side I've seen are that it "doesn't make you feel like you're at work", or that "multitasking is for internet dorks". 'Nuff said, I think.

You must log in to post a comment. You can login or register a new account.