it may move southward for some reason, therefore moving into warmer weather, causeing it to melt.Icebergs breaking off from antarctica can't move southward you fool
Created 19 years ago2005-07-04 16:17:44 UTC by BrattyLord
it may move southward for some reason, therefore moving into warmer weather, causeing it to melt.Icebergs breaking off from antarctica can't move southward you fool
I hate these threads that can only last one day and they are useless and stupid! Not to mention annoying!I hate these poeple that can only post mindless and meaningless insults and they are useless and stupid! Not to mention annoying!
Last time I checked it hurt the ozon layer pretty bad.Who cares about the "environment"? If we stopped doing everything that harmed the environment we would be very miserable indeed.
http://www.mindfully.org/Air/Fireworks-O
zone.htm
http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2001/06/27/sci
-tech/fireworks_smog010627
Who cares about the "environment"? If we continue destroying our environment we wouldnt be doing ANYTHING at all wink wink nudge nudgeI dont really care much about the ice berg issue. That can be stopped. Plus it would provide more drinkable water (as long as we process the salt water into drinking water). I care more about the greenhouse effect. We cant reverse that. the gases are all ready up there. Just recovering from an ice age??? What??? Does it actually take that long? (just wondering)
The fact that we're the cause of global warming is nothing but socialist propaganda.[sarcasm]Oh no....of course not...And the icebergs are just breaking off and randomly melting more then usual....[/sarcasm]
Does it actually take that long? (just wondering)Of course it does. You've never heard the term "geological timespan" referring to a very long time?
Mmmmm...I think you are right about that my post was stupid but I still think most of this forum is useless and zombieloffe said it too!then why are you even here?
These guys really are in hog-heaven, as Bill would put it.Or, as most people would say, they're selfish, stupid, lying, greedy, power-mad bastards.
If we bombed America, the world's output of damaging gas would drop by at least 50%. America has this retarded "We are more important than the world" attitude it seems, they couldn't give a shit how they ruin everything for other people.What about China? Theyre gonna make way more pollution than we ever did. If 300 million are bad just think what a billion can do.
Damn you, Jahzel! You have fallen.Aaaa!! Grammer Nazi!!!
Encyclop?dia. At least put the 'a' in, even if it's not a dipthong.
I think if we bombed Neo-TheQueer's house it would save the environment! And solve most of the worlds problems toocan we use nukes now?
Unless theres a huge asteroid which would wipe out life on this planet. Then theres a reason to use them.Sorry, just mucking about. I know nukes are bad. But countrys arent just going to say ''ok, ill dismantle all my nukes okey dokey?'' their are always gonna be aware that other countrys may attack them.
In America we spell it "encyclopedia"I know. That's why I was saying Jahzel had fallen by spelling it like that.
Nuclear weapons aren't built for taking down military strengths or dismantle an enemy - they're built to kill civilians - and lots of them.Well duh. I never mentioned that in my last post anyway. The only nukes that havent been used on citys are ones that were tested out in somewhere like the pacific. Besides, why would you build a bomb that powerful and then use it on a base?
ZL, if a country is attacked by nukes? What do you think governments are going to do? Sit their?I think they should. How does killing millions more innocent civilians advance their country when their people are dead?
I think they should. How does killing millions more innocent civilians advance their country when their people are dead?thats not what the governments gonna think is it?
Nowadays it is really easy to pot a missile in mid air and destory itWrong, some missles can avoid this, i think the nukes one of them. And governments can always use bombers to drop nukes.