Teleportals! Created 19 years ago2005-08-26 09:49:20 UTC by Unbreakable Unbreakable

Created 19 years ago2005-08-26 09:49:20 UTC by Unbreakable Unbreakable

Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 09:49:20 UTC Post #129926
Something that caught my eye, and will gaion your interest!

http://chronos.ws/teleportation.html

:glad:
Unbreakable UnbreakableWindows 7.9 Rating!
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 09:53:04 UTC Post #129930
I don't think teleportation is posselbe without killing the animal/human that goes through..
Very intresting though!
Madcow MadcowSpy zappin my udder
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 10:04:51 UTC Post #129936
Actually, scientific research labs have already created a small teleportation device, at the time, they can only teleport 1 atom at a time though.. but, soon, soon!
Unbreakable UnbreakableWindows 7.9 Rating!
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 10:39:09 UTC Post #129938
They have??
One atom,, lol, well, that's a good start! :P
The world will never have to load trucks and lift of the pruducts at the store,, instead of giving a letter to someone you teleport a letter, or just fax it or something.. :P
The humans will kill them self by lazyness, :(
Madcow MadcowSpy zappin my udder
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 10:45:02 UTC Post #129941
do you know that atom goes through two holes in the same time while being "teleported" ? :)
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 11:02:50 UTC Post #129946
seems imposseble, if only half of the atom is through the other parts would get away
Madcow MadcowSpy zappin my udder
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 11:32:39 UTC Post #129950
well, I don't know if the story I heard years ago and this one (teleportals) are the same, but it looks like, and I will tell you my version :

maybe 10 years ago, scientists succeeded to throw an atom with a speed near the light one.

the experience was fine.

One of the guy then said "mmh, ok that looks fine, but how do we really know this is the same atom we got at the "finish" point ?". "fine" said another, "lets make a checkpoint !", and they installed a sensor middle-way to check the atom is really going from point A to point B.

That was ok : the atom really went from A to B.

I don't know how nor why, but somebody decided to install an other check point after this experience, first in a line maybe (start => check 01 => check 02 => finish), and finally in a kinda crossover (start => check 01 => finish or start => check 02 => finish).

the atom went through both holes. :nuts:

"bah" somebody said, "something might be wrong in your system !".
then they checked the whole system :
"maybe your sensors are broken ?" the sensors were 100% operational.
"maybe you are throwing two atoms dumbass !!" no no no, only one atom was thrown each time ...
"hey, maybe that atom, for some reason, take a check, then the other !" mmh, no : both checkpoints were checked exactly at the same time ...

what do you think about that ? this is something I heard from a guy who read something etc, but that sounds amazing ! :) ...
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 12:07:04 UTC Post #129955
It is possible that the incredible speed at which it was transported was so great that the sensors picked it up at the exact time. Just like when you wave your hand in the air really fast you seem to have 30 fingers or so :)
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 12:16:42 UTC Post #129956
Sounds scary :o
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 12:30:06 UTC Post #129960
I want to try it :P
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 12:34:49 UTC Post #129961
What really scary is that Einstien predicted all of this more than 70 years ago :aghast:
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 12:39:21 UTC Post #129963
Well, that's one of the funny things about science. If he hadnt predicted it, would it be happening now? Probably not. A lot of scientific discoveries and inventions existed in the world of literature before they were made. Rockets to the moon, for example. This sort of things inspired mankind to go forward in research. Some people dream, others try to make those dreams come true.
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 12:40:03 UTC Post #129964
Einstien predicted all of this
Would you share with us where (exactly) Einstein predicted this?
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 13:05:14 UTC Post #129971
Einstien predicted all of this
Einstein was talking about a bended universe..
When a hole appared, the other side of the bend universe created an opening, and a way through, so he, didn't predict the teleport, he was talking about worm holes..
Same principal though (exept the bended universe), you had to travel in the speed of light to go through the worm hole to the other side, else, it would go off on the middle and you wouldn't make it through.

I've read about this but I don't trust my memory, but, I think I remember right for once.

############

So when you say teleport, you don't really mean teleport, but a cannon that shoots the matter in the speed of light? :S
Madcow MadcowSpy zappin my udder
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 13:32:09 UTC Post #129985
two holes in the same time
Yes, that's how the Young's Double-Slit experiment is explained using quantum theory, too, and how photons behave.
User posted image
That's a wave theory one, but the experiment is the same, just the explanation is different. Wikipedia it :).
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 13:37:51 UTC Post #129989
So when you say teleport, you don't really mean teleport, but a cannon that shoots the matter in the speed of light?
teleportation = you are here and suddenly you are there, it's a typical spell or ability in fantasy worlds, but is just impossible, in my 21th century guy's opinion, in our physical one ...

I don't believe in teleportation, for "entities" like us I mean, atoms and stuff like that ok, maybe, but for us, organic people, no : we are much too heavy for that, we would simply be disingrated if such effect, that would only exist, would be applied on us ... as I don't believe in the "speed of light" too : only photons can perform such "action", because their weight is almost zero, but I don't think so for us ...
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 17:06:08 UTC Post #130041
One atom? there's nothing to split there, the matter isnt being taken appart, it just slides through, of course you can teleport one atom. When its 2 or more you'd have to trip the particle appart.
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 17:23:31 UTC Post #130048
What? atoms are made of neutrons, protons, and electrons, which in turn are comprised of six flavours of quark... which may be comprised of super-strings. They're not the smallest thing around.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 17:34:44 UTC Post #130054
Inside the sun for example, atoms don't exist ...

You can break an atom, this is how are working atomic bombs and plants if I understood well :) ...
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 17:48:15 UTC Post #130065
Yep, that's how nuclear... er... fission works.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 18:06:40 UTC Post #130075
fission yeah I remember know :

we are able to perform fission effects, that generate about 1% of the Idontknowwhat matter energy, and the sun is doing the fusion, which use 10 or 20% of that same energy ...

and meanwhile, we are still using prehistorical fuel cars that only use about 0.001% of that energy, and release so nice pollution clouds :| ...

EDIT : http://www.energyquest.ca.gov/story/chapter13.html
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 18:35:57 UTC Post #130090
That site is interesting. I never knew there were 9 dimensions :confused:
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-26 19:33:20 UTC Post #130099
I don't find where you read that : ...
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-27 02:42:15 UTC Post #130150
There are more than that in mathematics.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-27 03:03:03 UTC Post #130152
Err, you can't shoot matter faster than the speed of light, chaps. Relativity states that as anything moves it slows down and increases in mass. So, even that one atom gains infinate mass and would therefore require infinite energy to move at the speed of light.

[edit: Furthermore, Hawkings, now believes that his theory of black holes cannot work, as they DO emit matter that has entered over a period of time. So wormholes are out too.]
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-27 14:42:44 UTC Post #130258
teleportation = you are here and suddenly you are there, it's a typical spell or ability in fantasy worlds, but is just impossible, in my 21th century guy's opinion, in our physical one ...
Yeah, if I understood you right...
I don't think that if you, for example, have an atom, you cant teleport it to the other side of earth, you'll have to fire it away or something..
An atom can't dissapare just like that, and then pop-up in an other space..
If I remember right, that would make a black hole.. Not sure about the black hole part though.
Madcow MadcowSpy zappin my udder
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-27 15:07:26 UTC Post #130259
I'm sure you misspoke.. uh.. mistyped?
Relativity states that as anything moves it slows down and increases in mass.
I'm sure you meant 'as anything moves faster, it increases in mass.'
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-27 16:01:20 UTC Post #130272
Thats not true however.. it doesn't increase in mass. Normal Physics...
Inertia is created! The word which should have been used was momentum, not mass.. :D

So ya, 'As anything moves faster, it builds/increases momentum' ;)
Unbreakable UnbreakableWindows 7.9 Rating!
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-27 16:30:14 UTC Post #130283
No, because mass and energy are the same thing. If something has more energy, it has more mass.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-27 16:50:04 UTC Post #130289
Mass:A property of matter equal to the measure of an object's resistance to changes in either the speed or direction of its motion. The mass of an object is not dependent on gravity and therefore is different from but proportional to its weight.

Energy:The capacity of a physical system to do work.

Sorry Seventh, you are correct... :D
Unbreakable UnbreakableWindows 7.9 Rating!
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-27 17:43:49 UTC Post #130317
An atom can't dissapare just like that, and then pop-up in an other space..
I read somewhere ages ago that there is an high probability that what you're talking about is possible : given the balance universe rule, and the fact that anti-matter (don't know it's the right word) exist, it is possible that somewhere in the space, a proton and an anti-proton (for example), merge into ... nothing, and somewhere else in space, spawn from nothing a proton and an anti-proton ...
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-27 20:52:11 UTC Post #130367
An atom can't dissapare just like that, and then pop-up in an other space..
Our very own Atom seems to have done a good job. :D
Quote:
Relativity states that as anything moves it slows down and increases in mass.

I'm sure you meant 'as anything moves faster, it increases in mass.'
Aye.

J.C: Balance universe rule? Define...
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-27 23:08:48 UTC Post #130375
Equilibrium... Balance
Unbreakable UnbreakableWindows 7.9 Rating!
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-27 23:11:57 UTC Post #130376
synonyms dont help. Is he talking about the Balanced universe theory, in which case he means DARK matter, or some antimatter theory?
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-28 16:01:19 UTC Post #130531
I believe the earth is in equilibrium with good and evil..
Unbreakable UnbreakableWindows 7.9 Rating!
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-28 16:16:05 UTC Post #130534
Just so you know: Einstiens relativity theori has been proven wrong.
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-28 17:37:53 UTC Post #130546
I believe the earth is in equilibrium with good and evil..
What?
So you believe in heaven and hell etc.? Or what? Could you explain what you mean?
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-28 18:19:52 UTC Post #130548
J.C: Balance universe rule? Define...
oh sorry I meant the "universe balance rule" :)

_that if a proton = "+" and an electron = "-", that there are as much protons and electrons in the whole universe, that the "electrical sum" of all those particles always = 0.
_that is antimatter exist, if there are anti-protons, there are as much anti-protons that protons, and that the "matter sum" (if they all collide) always = 0.
_that the heat/size ratio of the whole universe never changed, the universe keep on growing up, and getting cold, and if there will be a "big crunch", the universe will get hotter and hotter.
etc

just my point of view about things I heard and read. I strongly think the overall total of everything (the universe) never changed of a bit, that it cannot change ...
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-28 19:57:25 UTC Post #130549
Just so you know: Einstiens relativity theori has been proven wrong.
If you mean by quantum theory and superstring theories then no it hasn't, red. Relativity deals with things on the massive scale, quantum and strings on the miniscule scale.
  • slaps Red for talking such unfounded shite.
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-29 06:11:28 UTC Post #130595
hmmm... nice article :o
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-30 09:28:23 UTC Post #130874
smells like bullsh!t

a teleported object needs to be transformed into radio data and then sent via radio to a reciever and then rematerialized based on the data sent. close and plausible, but still not possible.
Rimrook RimrookSince 2003
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-30 09:32:38 UTC Post #130879
Just so you know: Einstiens relativity theori has been proven wrong.
Some parts of it is wrong,, don't remember what though.
Madcow MadcowSpy zappin my udder
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-30 10:32:47 UTC Post #130914
On a sub-atomic scale, fools. Other than that, as far as I know the only other theory ever proved wrong was his 'cosmological constant', which held the universe together. He called it the greatest mistake of his life. STRANGELY though, it turns out that the universe may actually accomodate the constant, but at a tiny level.

So far, all you've got is replication/deletion. And I doubt Kirk would have been so keen to be beemed up if it involved his total annihilation and a computer generated copy to be made every time he wanted to come aboard!

You can't move matter faster than light. You can't bend space time either, Hawkings went back on that (I'm still pissed off about buying his book and him saying "ooh, wait...no. Scratch that...") Therefore, matter cannot be 'teleported'.

So far the only theory that would even come close is one I saw in a documentry series which involved an improbability engine....no wait... :lol:
Posted 19 years ago2005-08-30 10:34:06 UTC Post #130915
WLE U KNA GO THRU PORTL LIEK IN HL LOL!
You must be logged in to post a response.