Okay. I can see that, maybe.
But I've two reasons for emphasising that so much. Let me explain:
1. I have to make sure you know I am using facts and science and NOT religion, otherwise, you could disregard everything I say.
2. No-one has admitted that I AM being objective, except Professa Oak.
I just want you people on the other sides of debates to do the same. Like Satchmo. Back up your arguments with more than just "Nuh uh! you're a closed-minded bastard." That's just what YOU say and it doesn't contribute to the debate. That would be like me saying "That's not true because god said it's not." Here's how it's the same: I don't care if YOU think so, and you don't care if GOD thinks so, so let's just use science.
If you don't want to hear the bible, I won't quote it. All you will listen to is Science, so I make sure everyone knows I'm using it. My mind is open to Religious AND scientific reason, whereas yours is open only to science. Which brings me to ask, Who is more open-minded?