Random, no-nonsense MP3 player thread. Created 17 years ago2006-11-16 20:35:19 UTC by Orpheus Orpheus

Created 17 years ago2006-11-16 20:35:19 UTC by Orpheus Orpheus

Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 20:35:19 UTC Post #202941
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 20:38:36 UTC Post #202942
mp3?s are different even if all of them are mp3?s.
wmp can?t play all of them... Thats just life..
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 20:43:44 UTC Post #202943
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 20:47:12 UTC Post #202944
Possibly, yes.

Download dbPowerAMP and re-encode the ones that don't work using LAME. Unfortunately, dbPowerAMP costs money thanks to its LAME support (which apparently isn't free anymore), so you'll have to get it via, erm, alternate means.
AJ AJGlorious Overlord
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 20:47:22 UTC Post #202945
No. The encoder doesn't affect compatibility, basically. Maybe they're VBR (variable bit-rate) and your player can't cope with that, or are some weird sample rate.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 20:48:51 UTC Post #202946
Okie dokie, contrasting answers. :P

LAME is definately the superior encoder though: I've compared the other ones and LAME has the better quality.

Can't hurt to re-encode them.
AJ AJGlorious Overlord
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 20:48:57 UTC Post #202947
The program you use to upload them...Does it say anything? If it was good it'd say certain MP3's need converting to work.

What does your MP3 do? Does it just refuse to play it or is there no sound?

If it was an Ipod it'd be easy to fix...I wonder if someone else owns the same MP3 player.
Habboi HabboiSticky White Love Glue
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 20:53:00 UTC Post #202949
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 21:00:33 UTC Post #202950
Can't hurt to re-encode them.
Dude, you must know that's bull. It definitely does hurt.

What questionable content?
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 21:02:43 UTC Post #202951
LAME Ain't an MP3 Encoder ftw. No one cares about warez talk, it would seem. It rules and we all know it.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 21:05:17 UTC Post #202952
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-16 22:52:39 UTC Post #202959
*slouches in, doesnt read any posts but manages to show orpheus the finger before slouching out again*
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-17 07:46:03 UTC Post #202983
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-17 10:48:15 UTC Post #202996
1. Pull out the mp3 player.
2. Plug in headphones
3. mp3 player turn [on] off.
4. Shove aforementioned mp3 player deep up your bum bum.

See if that helps anything ;)

Welcomes in advance.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-17 18:51:49 UTC Post #203048
touche
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-22 23:17:26 UTC Post #203744
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-23 01:24:19 UTC Post #203746
If it's a good MP3 player, it'll be reading the ID3 tags embedded in the MP3 file and not the file name.

All you need to do is open up the tag (you can do it in Windows by right clicking the file, going to Properties, hitting the Summary tab and then hitting advance. Mp3 software players will do the job too) and add in information for track number and album.

So one of the albums would be called "Book 1" which would then have track numbers for each of the discs, in the order they need to be.
AJ AJGlorious Overlord
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-23 06:40:09 UTC Post #203755
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-23 08:51:41 UTC Post #203761
I got one of those damn old ones when they first come out. Can't even select what tracks you want to hear, it can only be shuffled or played in the order that you place the mp3s in. :cry:

That said, I've never been bothered. :biggrin:
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-24 04:43:05 UTC Post #203873
Can't hurt to try, Orph.
AJ AJGlorious Overlord
You must be logged in to post a response.