Created 17 years ago2006-11-25 18:08:37 UTC by Orpheus
WARNING: God has nothing to do with this!Wet myself..
woman inherit the earthAs Dr. Ian Malcom and Dr. Ellie Sattler would argue, first men must create dinoaurs, and then dinosaurs must destroy men. Only then, women will inherit the earth.
a "powerful figure" hardly determines how suited you are for warIn terms of marksmanship, I would agree.
-Why are there no women in Ultimate fighting or boxing?Because of social norms and stereotypes. That's it.
-Why would the best women's footbal team get crushed by the worst men's team?
Because of social norms and stereotypes.Ummm... please. When you collect your real argument, please let me know.
Same reason there are no straight people in ballet or men in knitting.That could be the dumbest thing I've ever heard... ever.
Uh, a "powerful figure" hardly determines how suited you are for war . I'd say it's pretty individual how well-suited you are for the battlefield... has little to do with gender. A larger figure and stronger physical strength are pretty much useless unless you live in ancient Greece or something.A more powerful structure means more stamina, which is absolutely neccessary for a soldier. Science and genetics override opinion. Its more than just trench warfare where it all depends on who can shoot more accurately. And of course, like Rowley said before, more strength is needed to carry gear, and soldiers carry a shitload of crap around with them.
Conscription is grossly uncivilised.I disagree. What's wrong with being forced to serve your country? We should all want to serve our country.
Even many "fit" girls are weak. My girlfriend competed at the state level for soccer last year--she is in shape as they get--, but she has no upper body strength... she can barely do one push-up!!1Your point? Playing soccer and training in the army isn't the same thing. Yes, by default men have more physical strength than women, but does that mean that women offered the same training as their male counterparts are weaker?