un-wavy beams
Created 20 years ago2004-05-31 13:52:00 UTC by
M_gargantua
Created 20 years ago2004-05-31 13:52:00 UTC by
M_gargantua
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-31 13:52:00 UTC
Post #29513
my beams always look like lasers. I can never get them to do the wavy beam thing like in the multisource tutorial. plz help.
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-31 13:59:04 UTC
Post #29515
There is a property in the env_laser nad env_beam options, called noise this adjusts how much the beam waves around. check out the tutorial example map;http://www.cariad.co.za/twhl/tutorialdl/multisource.zip
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-31 13:59:55 UTC
Post #29516
oops that link didn't work its at the bottom of the tutorial page
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-31 14:05:15 UTC
Post #29518
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-31 14:08:55 UTC
Post #29519
I just figured that out about 1 minute ago because i was fooling around with the settings. sorry for the useless post. BUT WHO IN THERE RIGHT MINDS WOULD LIST THAT AS "AMOUNT OF NOISE" 
.why not something like amount of warble or something more relevent?
.why not something like amount of warble or something more relevent?
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-31 16:57:13 UTC
Post #29551
ask the FREAKS at half-life! j/k
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-31 17:20:17 UTC
Post #29574
Uh, it's a graphics term. Evidently the engine uses a noise algorithm of some kind to produce the effectual output demonstrated </bs>
Posted 20 years ago2004-06-01 07:49:58 UTC
Post #29645
Doesn't anyone use Cathode Ray Oscilisopes anymore?
Noise is the effect of input variation in relation to beam width.
</morebs>
Noise is the effect of input variation in relation to beam width.
</morebs>
Posted 20 years ago2004-06-01 08:00:52 UTC
Post #29650
"electromagnetic radiation that is composed of several frequencies and that involves random changes in frequency or amplitude" </nobs>
Posted 20 years ago2004-06-01 08:13:20 UTC
Post #29662
</nobs>? noobs? huh? what? and stop being so scientific! it makes my brain hurt!
Posted 20 years ago2004-06-01 08:16:25 UTC
Post #29666
highly supercillious manner we understand
Posted 20 years ago2004-06-01 15:25:55 UTC
Post #29725
supercillious? owwwy!!!
You must be logged in to post a response.