This is amazing! Created 20 years ago2004-09-28 12:11:23 UTC by spark spark

Created 20 years ago2004-09-28 12:11:23 UTC by spark spark

Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 12:11:23 UTC Post #62714
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3791795.stm

Check this article out! It's about some guy who's developing an invisibility suit! It even has pictures!

Jahzel, no offence, but if you're going to say this is a weapon of some kind or a conspiracy, don't. I posted this merely as an amusement.
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 12:20:35 UTC Post #62717
Professor Tachi's cloak works by projecting an image onto itself of what is behind the wearer.

A computer generates the image that is projected, so the viewer effectively sees "through" the cloak.
Not really an invisibility cloak.
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 12:22:26 UTC Post #62718
It's still in progress, and he aims it to be fully invisble. :P
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 12:29:14 UTC Post #62720
Whoa, I thought I dreamt of that, I guess I really did read it :|
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 12:41:51 UTC Post #62723
Ok, this sounds very unlikely.
With a little knowledge of technology and 3D space, you can think of several counter-arguments to the idea of this thing.
1. Humans have two eyes, which allows them to see perspectively. It is possible to create holograms which appear like a 3 dimensional image, although they're kept on a flat film. But creating those holograms is technical laborious. Go to a university, many have the apparatus you need to create holographic images. Also it is not possible to create a holograme that can be viewed from 360? degrees.
2. There would have to be billions of optic sensors that scan the environment built into the suit. Even that would not suffice, there would also have to be sensors that scan the areas that cannot be seen from the surface of the suit. Look at the state of the art. We don't even have computers that can interprete the image from a single camera with a high definition in a reasonable amount of time. This computer in the suit would have to interprete billions of images at least 80 times per second.
3. What if you have multiple people looking at the suit. Which image will be displayed on the suit? You can only render the image one person would see in one frame.
4. What about light reflections? There is no solid material that does not reflect light.
5. What happens to the shadows that person who is wearing the suit casts? Every material influences the light, either it reflects it, or just changes the direction it is traveling in. The computer would also have to compensate these shadows and add shadows that would be projected onto the environment if the wearer of the suit was not there.

That's not everything. Just a few examples which are quite obvious.
Don't believe everything you read, even if it comes from the BBC.

Think outside the square!
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 13:04:43 UTC Post #62727
Wow--
Unbreakable UnbreakableWindows 7.9 Rating!
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 13:05:54 UTC Post #62728
Amusing, but impossible with todays technology.
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 13:39:54 UTC Post #62733
The first one is hardly invisable, it's a watery green. :D
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 13:50:35 UTC Post #62734
Noticed that this suit has a different color/shape on each article.
Also you can easily fake this.
Want to see my new invisible shoes?
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 13:54:56 UTC Post #62735
Want to see my new invisible shoes?
Sure, post some pics.
:P
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 14:28:14 UTC Post #62740
[qoute]
People will take you more seriously if you could spell.
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 15:07:46 UTC Post #62756
...and punctuation entered that sentence... where?
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 15:09:13 UTC Post #62757
u2 thats the point so stfu
that doesn't even qualify as spelling, that's just geeky abbreviation.
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 15:14:22 UTC Post #62762
A few letters typed wrong now and then, what's the point? Happens to all of us (and it's the main reason I'd like an edit option for my own posts...). Completely uncomprehendable blabbering is a different thing...

As for the invisible suit, sounds buggy, but perhaps he can achieve a good camouflage effect. Looking similar to your background is always better than to be fully visible, though I doubt he will achieve a total 'invisibility'.
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 15:14:38 UTC Post #62763
Invisibility was achieved in the Philedelphia Experiment

http://www.bielek.com/preston.htm
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 17:33:36 UTC Post #62797
Wow, I return to this thread a couple of hours later to find out it has turned into a battlefield. People here can't get along, at least it seems that way. :
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 17:44:41 UTC Post #62798
True, spark... :(
I always wondered if there was a way to weave tiny fibre optic cables into some kind of a suit, so that each end would pass the light from one side to the other, around the wearer. This guys idea seems better. And probably works. And isnt stupid. And its a hoodie. Darn japanese, always one step ahead of me!!
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-28 19:47:16 UTC Post #62815
Most of the world, I'd say. :P
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-29 01:10:29 UTC Post #62845
Want to see my new invisible shoes?
Sure, post some pics.
There you go!
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-29 11:28:29 UTC Post #62929
w0w, like t0t411y 0MGr0fl N4RLY d00d.

I can see the strings on 'em by the way, sorry im not convinced. :P
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-29 13:38:43 UTC Post #62957
Here's another picture of the suit I found:

http://www.ananova.com/images/web/42152.jpg
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-29 15:43:26 UTC Post #62981
that is crazy! i want one!
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-29 16:10:17 UTC Post #62991
oh :roll:
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-29 18:11:25 UTC Post #63004
There you go!
WEWT U R TEH INVENTOR JAARZI!1!1
Posted 20 years ago2004-09-30 17:34:32 UTC Post #63276
what?
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-03 10:18:09 UTC Post #63827
its harry potter all over again!
Habboi HabboiSticky White Love Glue
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-03 10:55:37 UTC Post #63837
lol :lol:

Perverts will use it.
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-03 11:59:51 UTC Post #63860
I don't care what you all say its preety cool. I would so love to get my hands on a completely invisable one though... for my own purposes :P . They should make one thats like a wetsuit, so that you don't see crease shadows.
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-03 20:24:13 UTC Post #63936
im with, david, my purposes... :badass:
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-06 11:11:12 UTC Post #64446
The olny way to make this thing fully insvisible is to make the light go around it. When something doesn't reflect light, can't be seen by the unperfect human eye. Just warp the light waves around it and then bring them back to normal trajectories. No shdows, no reflection. Simple, eh?

Jahzel, your link says nothing about invisible suits.
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-06 11:17:14 UTC Post #64447
The olny way to make this thing fully insvisible is to make the light go around it.
Like my idea?
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-06 11:20:21 UTC Post #64448
No, but it is a link to a site which contains info on the montauk project, and the philedelphia experiment. (A US naval vessel had been rendered invisible using frequency technology researched at the Montauk facility in New York.) This was years ago, how advanced do you think they are now? (covertly?) - The Stealth Bomber is said to be able to transform itself to optically invisible and not just radar invisible, using Montauk technology. (Montauk was funded by the billions claimed from the Nazi gold train)
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-06 11:28:26 UTC Post #64450
who in turn got it from.....space reptiles....blah blah......Bob Hope and the Queen Mum.... :P
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-06 11:29:52 UTC Post #64452
I'm afraid not, Mephs, sice that way diffirent POV will produce the same picture and this is not the desired effect. Instead use a powerfull elctromagnetic field to warp the light or special meterial, wich allows the light to slide over it, instead being reflected.
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-06 11:32:24 UTC Post #64455
STFU! :x

jk
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-06 12:26:51 UTC Post #64488
Instead use a powerfull elctromagnetic field to warp the light or special meterial, wich allows the light to slide over it, instead being reflected.
- which is exactly how the Philidelphia experiement was carried out. The electromagnetic field is created using some sort of frequency amplifier. Wires were 'wrapped' around the entire ship which somehow gave off electromagnetism, rendering the ship invisible - somehow disappearing into a 'green mist'. Only problem is, when the ship reappeared, most of the crew were set on fire, some went insane, and some were embedded into the steal hull of the ship.
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-06 12:37:23 UTC Post #64498
...and then i woke up!
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-10 01:22:32 UTC Post #65145
wow!
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-11 04:00:38 UTC Post #65332
the prototype, is loosly applied to the term "invisible". but it is all in relavence, to how the human eye sees. So yes its not like we always thought it might be, but still gets the same effect. Almost like the (Predator) I see somebody or somthing walkin down the street in one of those im pullin out my chain gun with automatic rocket launcher and infra red googles lol hahahahaha

copper
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-11 04:03:55 UTC Post #65333
A.nd to hazardous We didn't have computers that could communicate, or do half the stuff we do today. So anything is possible now a days. Its because of scientist like him that think outside the box, that we really get anywhere in the world today so good on him.

copper :)
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-11 05:36:06 UTC Post #65339
with electromagnetic fields and stuff making it invisible would just be on radar out of sight thats all not par say invisible?
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-11 06:11:20 UTC Post #65347
'Per se'?

...and what?
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-12 01:28:25 UTC Post #65505
May be some extra punctoation will clarify your post. I don't get anything of it...
Posted 20 years ago2004-10-12 03:47:27 UTC Post #65519
You want to know about a good invisibility suit, read "The Emperor's New Clothes". I think Disney did it....
You must be logged in to post a response.