X600 X700, whats the dif? Created 19 years ago2005-02-05 16:29:00 UTC by Rileymo Rileymo

Created 19 years ago2005-02-05 16:29:00 UTC by Rileymo Rileymo

Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 16:29:00 UTC Post #88348
Whats the diference between the a ATI X600 and a X700? They both cost about the same, so I was wondering what the difference was.

Also, has anyone heard anything about a ATI SLI part?
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 16:50:31 UTC Post #88349
X600 and 700 suck. If you want an X*** card, get an X800 Pro, otherwise it's pointless. X600 and X700 are for PCI-E which hardly anything supports yet unless you want a shitty Intel i9x5 mobo or an ultra expensive nForce 4 mobo.
m0p m0pIllogical.
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 16:50:52 UTC Post #88350
SLI is nothing but a thing for hardware-geeks to drool on. :|
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 16:59:20 UTC Post #88351
2x 6800GT'S = nice
But yeah, x600 and x700 suckie suckie. Expensive and crappier than radeon 9600-series :/
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 17:02:03 UTC Post #88352
2x 6800GT'S = nice
I don't think it's worth the money graphicwise.
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 17:08:51 UTC Post #88353
Why are you people dissing PCIe?
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 17:12:31 UTC Post #88354
By the way, you still going to get a Dell?
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 17:12:32 UTC Post #88355
jaardsi, SLI is worth it, not for graphics quality, but for framerate. SLI improves frame rate by like nearly 2 times, good news for benchers. The only thing that PCI-E is good for is SLI, otherwise it's a fucking waste of money. Intel sucked the moment they invented the 915i and the 925x.
m0p m0pIllogical.
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 17:14:28 UTC Post #88356
Benchers are exactly what I meant with 'hardware-geeks' ;)
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 17:18:37 UTC Post #88357
I don't know, theres a small chance my dad will build one. With a price tag of $1,200.00.
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 17:21:23 UTC Post #88358
No one has answered my question, I know that the X600 has only 4 mem. pipelines, how many does X700 have?

My new PC is expected to be in next week! I'm so excited!
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 17:28:40 UTC Post #88359
ive got the x800... 9583 3d marks!! OH YEAH!
PWNED! (sorry, i dont generally use that lol)
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 17:49:42 UTC Post #88365
Gateway is starting to like nice... besides the UGLY case!
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 18:00:56 UTC Post #88368
Prebuilt PC's are always shit imo. By the way gone_latin, do you mean 3DMark 03? Then you have a very poor score my good sir, sorry, but 10,000 is a crap score. I could run 3DMark later, but that would involve installing Windows, so it looks like I will have to ruin my reputation as a Linux user to run 3DMark :(
m0p m0pIllogical.
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 18:16:32 UTC Post #88373
Windows owns linux, end of story.
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 18:21:22 UTC Post #88375
10,000 scores @ 3dmark 03 ?
Regular pc. If you get 10,000 @ 3dMark05 = O_______O
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 18:30:36 UTC Post #88382
Windows DOES NOT own Linux. Windows is coded by a bunch of fatass Americans who eat McDonalds for breakfast, brunch, lunch, dinner and supper (thats why americans are fat. extra meals!) and probably watch more TV in a day than the average UK, Finnish, Australian or whatever person does in a month. Windows is a sloppily coded piece of shit. And, Bill Gates has autism! Fucking owned! The average american has a below average IQ. That kind of explains Windows then. By the way, 3DMark 05 sucks since only ATi users get good scores.
m0p m0pIllogical.
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 18:37:47 UTC Post #88392
Windows is coded by a bunch of fatass Americans who eat McDonalds for breakfast, brunch, lunch, dinner and supper (thats why americans are fat. extra meals!)

Gabe Newell ;D I dont exactly remember what was his job at microsoft but still..

And yes, 3dMark05 is better with ATI cards :/
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 23:01:14 UTC Post #88480
I have a fairly nice IQ.

ANd im not fat. I usually eat 2 meals a day. :)
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-05 23:32:24 UTC Post #88481
i have an IQ of 156 and im skinny. real skinny. even though i eat alot :P
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-06 00:43:29 UTC Post #88490
Me and you have that in common, fats metabolism i guess. I only play b-ball.
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-06 08:00:52 UTC Post #88513
windows does suck. badly. if steam was on mac this is what id be using http://www.apple.com/powermac/performance/
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-06 08:17:24 UTC Post #88516
G5 = sexiest ever.
But too expensive.
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-06 08:31:35 UTC Post #88517
The main reason I don't use Windows is that you must use the GUI for everything. A proper shell would make it a whole lot better.

Oh, and SLI is good for people using two monitors.
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-06 11:55:18 UTC Post #88530
jaardsi, you don't. I often use the command-line.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-06 15:06:46 UTC Post #88558
Please answer my question!
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-06 16:17:59 UTC Post #88561
I'M FAT AND UGLY AND HAVE AN IQ ABOUT 40 HAHAHA
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-06 16:37:01 UTC Post #88564
jaardsi, you don't. I often use the command-line.
I said proper, not MS-CRAP.
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-07 16:10:20 UTC Post #88755
As opposed to Linus-crap? :|

Riley: Googlez0r? People just like arguing here.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-08 14:37:03 UTC Post #89013
Unix predates Windows by nearly 20 years. I think Unix shells are the "proper" command line. Unix is the first decent system around.
m0p m0pIllogical.
You must be logged in to post a response.