Journal #5835

Posted 14 years ago2009-06-01 13:40:07 UTC
Striker StrikerI forgot to check the oil pressure
PC Upgrade !

New memories arrived at my door today !
4x1GB DDR2 1066 mhz , Kingston HyperX !!

Here they are, I already installed them in the pc ( you can see the metallic things near the CPU cooler) :
User posted image
Here are the old rams :
User posted image
Those were 2x1 GB Corsair Twin DDR2 800 mhz, Enhaced Performance Profile.

I think I'm going to keep them for now, in the current month I'll run my pc with the new memories to see if I get BSODs ( with the corsair ones I never had) . But after that, over the summer I'll sell them ( I only used them half a year) , add some money and get a new motherboard with an E8400 or E8500. Or maybe keep the money for the next 2-3 years and build a Nehalem platform :D

[EDIT] Who tells me the correct total numbers of cooling fans from my computer wins the Eagle Eye Award :P

15 Comments

Commented 14 years ago2009-06-01 14:07:30 UTC Comment #56446
I was going to say, those Corsair Twin DDR2's still got a lot of life in them. Im sure if you put them on eBay, you will get a fair amout for them. By thw way, what exactly do you mean by a Nehalem platform?
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-01 15:20:53 UTC Comment #56438
Very nice! post some bencmarks to see how it impacts your performance!

wow i didn't think ddr2 ran at that fast bus speed but i don't really know a lot about ram.. when i got my ddr3 1066 with the matching data bus last year i felt like hot shit..

)

Commented 14 years ago2009-06-01 15:43:35 UTC Comment #56447
DONT GET AN ATI CARD! IT KILLS HAMMER CELLS!
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-01 15:49:54 UTC Comment #56434
JeffMOD: Agreed.

The_(c)Striker I have that exact corsair memory only two 2 gig sticks. I ordered them from Newegg and the first time I received them they were bad, so I had to send them back. The new ones worked until recently when my psu died and the memory went with it.

Congrats on the new memory :]
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-01 16:26:48 UTC Comment #56439
ya jeff so many good goldsource mappers have fell to to ATI's sword...
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-01 16:51:53 UTC Comment #56448
ATI must be stopped. I think I have an ATI card in the comp I'm using, but it's not state of the art, so I'm safe. But without hammer cells you can't map... They are essential to a mapper's life.
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-01 17:34:06 UTC Comment #56441
I didn't make a benchmark, but I made a test. I run :

Firefox with aprox 30 tabs
Chrome with aprox 50 tabs
Need For Speed Undercover
Stalker Shadow of Chernobyl
Skype, Yahoo, MSN
Comodo Firewall, Avast!

What can I say ? It consumed aprox 90% of the identified ram ( 3.5 gb out of 4 gb, I'm running xp 32 bit). That's 3,24 GB of Ram.

And the awesome thing was that I could switch with alt+tab from game to game and from application to application and the performance wasn't much affected
.

Nehalem platform ? Sorry for my bad english , well ... an i7 computer that's what I meant ! :D :P
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-01 17:52:18 UTC Comment #56435
Do you run Vista or XP? 32-bit or 64-bit?

Unless you're using 64-bit OS, the memory upgrade wouldn't really make sense.
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-01 18:10:09 UTC Comment #56440
yeah isn't that impossible under xp32 striker? I thought the maximum memory xp could address was 2 gb?
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-01 18:46:24 UTC Comment #56443
yes, max @ 32 bit is 2 gb.
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-01 21:09:00 UTC Comment #56436
actually i'ts 3.18 gig, i have 4 gig DDR2 in here right now. I'm just waiting til windows 7 comes out til i can use it
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-02 05:10:16 UTC Comment #56445
I had 4 GB of RAM, but it turned out one of the RAM sticks was causing system crashes and Day of Defeat: Source turning pink. I removed two of them, instead of just the faulty one, because they were slower than the two other RAM sticks.
I'm going to buy 2 GB more. Windows XP Professional x64 Edition and 64 bit Linux can use a maximum of 128GB or 16EB, so having more than 3GB RAM is not an argument for getting Windows Vista/7. I'll probably "buy" Windows 7 anyway, once it gets stable. Probably.
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-02 07:03:44 UTC Comment #56442
My system recognizes 3.5 GB of ram. And I already told you I made some tests.
So all that bullshit with only 2 GB under Windows XP 32 Bit is nonsense for me.

Yes, it limits the amount of ram. But not to 2 . To 3,5 GB , for me :P

And I got the rams for free, I only paid the transport. I worked on a site , making some reviews. So why not use them ? Especially that sometimes I need more than 2 GB of ram ( like video editing).
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-02 18:10:21 UTC Comment #56444
So why does vista only detecs 2GB of rams when I have 4GB :(
32 bit
Commented 14 years ago2009-06-02 20:12:31 UTC Comment #56437
maybe it's setup wrong?

You must log in to post a comment. You can login or register a new account.