It's like talking to a wall.
I don't disagree with your views and I'm not saying all conspiracy theories are bullshit - I'm saying stop acting like an asshole or you'll scare people off instead of "waking them up" as you call it.
Forum posts
- Forums
- Posts
- Posted by
ZombieLoffe
I played Emporio's cracked non-steam CS:S before Half-Life 2 was released, but that was the only time. It's just not worth the hassle to warez steam games.
I'm a bit curious as to where you bought the game?
I'm a bit curious as to where you bought the game?
Granted, there's a lot of policemen not doing their job properly in the US (evidently). Action should be taken against them, too.
And DocRock, shush. If all you can say to prove conspiracy theories is "Wake up, you're all blind", don't. You just sound like a doomsday prophet, and like Playbus said, you're not helping. All that achieves is alienate people even more from radical theories.
Jahzel, disbelieving theories doesn't mean we worship authority. I doubt anyone does. If you stopped insulting everyone who disagreed with your point of view, you'd probably have more success convincing people.
And DocRock, shush. If all you can say to prove conspiracy theories is "Wake up, you're all blind", don't. You just sound like a doomsday prophet, and like Playbus said, you're not helping. All that achieves is alienate people even more from radical theories.
Jahzel, disbelieving theories doesn't mean we worship authority. I doubt anyone does. If you stopped insulting everyone who disagreed with your point of view, you'd probably have more success convincing people.
I can't remember all the mods I started with m0px and people from IRC... Isotope is the only name that comes into mind, but there were others... That was more than 2 years ago, though. Black Death was one, too, not too sure. Oh well.
I believe there're some cracked (Emporio, perhaps?) HL2 versions floating around, as well as CS: Source.
Ghetto, learn how to use the internets or take it back to where you bought it.
Ghetto, learn how to use the internets or take it back to where you bought it.
Change the <div class="headers"></div> to <h4></h4>. Much more semantic. Should be easy replace work, both in the HTML and CSS.
Use texlights. Now!
If ZHLT doesn't work, you haven't set it up properly. The standard Q-tools are horrible and there's absolutely no reason to use them.
If ZHLT doesn't work, you haven't set it up properly. The standard Q-tools are horrible and there's absolutely no reason to use them.
Forming a swastika on habbo isn't as easy as it sounds. /b/-tards are surprisingly disorganised. We came pretty close once, though... then we just gave up and started blocking the pool (it had AIDS, you see).
Awful on D, just awful.
E: Eli Vance.
E: Eli Vance.
Worse than /b/, better than CAD.
Habbo is for 8 year olds and /b/ raids, please, come ON.
I'll take K: Kingpin!
N: Nihilanth.
N: Nihilanth.
The swastika is actually a symbol for the sun, it was used a lot by, amongst others, Christians before the second world war. I've seen the swastika inscribed on an old church bell.
The notion that Jesus Christ is really derived from sun-worshipping doesn't seem too far-off for me. I don't know about you guys, but the first part of Zeitgeist seemed pretty convincing to me (skip the initial overture, it's ridiculous). A very cool documentary.
Jahzel: Those two videos (3rd doesn't work) don't really prove anything about global conspiracies - they're just speeches about
a) an "order of the law", which indeed does sound shifty (I never liked Bush Sr.), but doesn't really say anything about a conspiracy. I doubt the goals of the UN founders include the loss of civil rights.
b) Globalisation and economic powers. He talks about free trade, a free market and investment in education, not spying on our citizens. The fact that he uses the term "new world order" doesn't prove anything except that that wording has been used by many before him, regarding completely different subjects.
The notion that Jesus Christ is really derived from sun-worshipping doesn't seem too far-off for me. I don't know about you guys, but the first part of Zeitgeist seemed pretty convincing to me (skip the initial overture, it's ridiculous). A very cool documentary.
Jahzel: Those two videos (3rd doesn't work) don't really prove anything about global conspiracies - they're just speeches about
a) an "order of the law", which indeed does sound shifty (I never liked Bush Sr.), but doesn't really say anything about a conspiracy. I doubt the goals of the UN founders include the loss of civil rights.
b) Globalisation and economic powers. He talks about free trade, a free market and investment in education, not spying on our citizens. The fact that he uses the term "new world order" doesn't prove anything except that that wording has been used by many before him, regarding completely different subjects.
You should always question authority, no matter what, I don't think anyone really disagrees with that. Thing is, you make it out to be we're denying some obvious truth that only the elevated can see, while the rest of us savour our slavery, then you call us ignorant when we question your truth. Why are you, or Prison Planet, more reliable than the media or the government, or what we see with our own eyes? I'm not saying any of your theories or world views are downright wrong, I'm saying why should we blindly believe them, when you say we should always question those in power?
Seems a bit hypocritical, especially since most of us have never seen the effect of this New World Order as you claim is already taking over.
Seems a bit hypocritical, especially since most of us have never seen the effect of this New World Order as you claim is already taking over.
Well, if the world is indeed already being masterminded by evil alien reptiles who dress up like queens, what's going to get worse? According to truthism (and I'm guessing that's what both Doc and Jahzel stand behind), the world's been under their control for thousands of years. How are things going to get worse? I mean, they're pretty good as it is, least for me. I mean, I can't complain. Why would the ruling elite change something now?
Meh, perhaps I'm jumping to conclusions. After all, truthism (ridiculous site, by the way) has little to do with 9/11 conspiracies and cops gone bad and civil rights going out the window. Sigh.
Meh, perhaps I'm jumping to conclusions. After all, truthism (ridiculous site, by the way) has little to do with 9/11 conspiracies and cops gone bad and civil rights going out the window. Sigh.
I think his point was "buying a new computer with less than 2GB ram is stupid", not "vista needs 2GB ram".
As if you visit "intelligent" forums.
H: Half-Life
F: fdg fileFGD.
I'm guessing Portal is pre-black mesa, seeing as how all the equipment (except the Aperture Science Handheld Portal Device (ASHPD (Adrian Shephard!?!?!?!))) all looks like old 70's stuff, like the terminals. It'll be interesting.
D: Diabolical Adrenaline Guitar (from the HL soundtrack)
As awesome as Isaac Asimov is, I can't be arsed. Later.
Look. If I believe in one conspiracy theory, I have to believe all of themNonsense.
FF7: AC wasn't bad, I quite enjoyed it.
Screenshot must not depict any custom contentDidn't see that coming.
Fuck OSX, just get Linux if you want something that can't play games or do anything else properly.
In response to the paper bags I move to Bond Street where I rolled a 6 and is forced to redouble stacks W, J and K within 4 turns or otherwise make counter-clockwise moves in the north-south direction. Damn, if only I'd rolled a 7 or more...
God damn that looks awesome. Damn it, as much as I hate it, I'm totally envious of your leet hax skills, Rimrook :<.
Heh, not bad. The DivX stream works great.
Soon there will be games which are Vista only. And their number will only grow."Soon" is probably more than 6 months away. No reason to upgrade now, and even when DX10-only games start coming out, there'll probably be standalone DX10 releases for XP.
Ah, Ebaumsworld, why must you give 4chan such a bad name? Honestly, it's not nice.
I don't see why not. The only problem with incest is the chance of damaged children, so that might be a good idea to prevent, but it has little to do with marriage.
Jeez, zeeba-G, you're an idiot. Ever heard of sarcasm?
Besides, marriage isn't a "holy union" anymore, it's a legally binding contract. Therefore, it should be available to everyone.
Besides, marriage isn't a "holy union" anymore, it's a legally binding contract. Therefore, it should be available to everyone.
How rude.
It's still not legalised here, which is for shame. There's virtually no one in opposition of it except the Christian party and seriously, no one listens to them anyway. I don't really know why nothing's been done about it yet.
There are millions of single parents raising perfectly fine kids.
Besides, since homosexual couples can't have kids, why are we discussing this? If homosexuals should be allowed to adopt is a different issue.
Besides, since homosexual couples can't have kids, why are we discussing this? If homosexuals should be allowed to adopt is a different issue.
What? Sajo's post made so little sense it almost hurt.
We've already agreed on that, Ant, read the rest of the thread.
Yeah, I suppose the church does have the right to refuse marrying people... But it's still sort of hard to know where to draw the line. Meh. Oh well, first things first; gay marriage should be legalised.
Yeah, I suppose the church does have the right to refuse marrying people... But it's still sort of hard to know where to draw the line. Meh. Oh well, first things first; gay marriage should be legalised.
This post was made on a thread that has been deleted.
Condoms were a technological advancement. Sex is good.
So condoms are wrong?
How is gay pride bad?
How is gay pride bad?
Well, say it properly instead of sounding like a fascist.
Even if the Church is a somewhat private institution and gays could indeed marry legally (my parents never went to church for their wedding), it's still discrimination.
It's as if McDonald's would one day say "We don't want to serve blacks, because it goes against our moral values" - I'm pretty certain people wouldn't be okay with it.
So yeah, I guess it depends on where you want to draw the line between the freedoms of private organisations (the churches) and the rights of citizens.
It's as if McDonald's would one day say "We don't want to serve blacks, because it goes against our moral values" - I'm pretty certain people wouldn't be okay with it.
So yeah, I guess it depends on where you want to draw the line between the freedoms of private organisations (the churches) and the rights of citizens.
How is homosexuality "bad psychological behaviour"? You sound like a fascist from the '60s saying it's a disease.
Besides, allowing people to marry eachother is hardly encouraging homosexuality. Ridiculous.
Marriage is a basic civil right and should be available to everyone, as long as both partners are consensual adults. It's just that simple.
Whether or not churches should be forced to wed gays is another issue, and a harder one to resolve... Personally, I think they should be. It would be discriminatory to let them shut out the gays.
Besides, allowing people to marry eachother is hardly encouraging homosexuality. Ridiculous.
Marriage is a basic civil right and should be available to everyone, as long as both partners are consensual adults. It's just that simple.
Whether or not churches should be forced to wed gays is another issue, and a harder one to resolve... Personally, I think they should be. It would be discriminatory to let them shut out the gays.
Dorian summarized everything I was about to post. <3
You're an idiot if you can't spot even the most obvious sarcasm, i.e. every point in my first post. Jeez.
This post was made on a thread that has been deleted.
Some of your points should be disproven here.Did you even read my first post?
I guess TWHL is in agreement - every sensible person ever is pro gay marriage.