Happy July 4th!!! Created 18 years ago2005-07-04 16:17:44 UTC by BrattyLord

it may move southward for some reason, therefore moving into warmer weather, causeing it to melt.

Icebergs breaking off from antarctica can't move southward you fool

I hate these threads that can only last one day and they are useless and stupid! Not to mention annoying!

I hate these poeple that can only post mindless and meaningless insults and they are useless and stupid! Not to mention annoying!

btw: this thread has lasted more than 1 day.

lol, I meant North

You know what I mean dude

Mmmmm...I think you are right about that my post was stupid but I still think most of this forum is useless and zombieloffe said it too!

Let it go, I already forgot you even posted...

Last time I checked it hurt the ozon layer pretty bad.
http://www.mindfully.org/Air/Fireworks-O
zone.htm
http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2001/06/27/sci
-tech/fireworks_smog010627

Who cares about the "environment"? If we stopped doing everything that harmed the environment we would be very miserable indeed.

The major ozone damaging compounds, CFC's have been banned and that alone will greatly reduce any damage. As for global warming, that is a naturally occuring cycle of hot climates and ice ages. And we are currently recovering from the last ice age and heading toward another hot climate. Theres nothing we can do to stop it either. (If we did, well hey, we're interfering with a natural process and that would be hurting the environment) The fact that we're the cause of global warming is nothing but socialist propaganda. We are simply making a minor contribution to something that's already inevetible.

Who cares about the "environment"? If we continue destroying our environment we wouldnt be doing ANYTHING at all wink wink nudge nudge

I dont really care much about the ice berg issue. That can be stopped. Plus it would provide more drinkable water (as long as we process the salt water into drinking water). I care more about the greenhouse effect. We cant reverse that. the gases are all ready up there. Just recovering from an ice age??? What??? Does it actually take that long? (just wondering)

We nead to rename this thread ''the environmentally issues board. Come and argue like real dumb politicians''

For now i say do something now.

The fact that we're the cause of global warming is nothing but socialist propaganda.

[sarcasm]Oh no....of course not...And the icebergs are just breaking off and randomly melting more then usual....[/sarcasm]

Does it actually take that long? (just wondering)

Of course it does. You've never heard the term "geological timespan" referring to a very long time?

I've heard the same thing about just leaving an ice age, though.

Nature is nature, end of story. We humans seem to think that the universe centres around us and that we have the right to change the laws of the universe. If the universe says we are a pile of shite then let it do so.

Mmmmm...I think you are right about that my post was stupid but I still think most of this forum is useless and zombieloffe said it too!

then why are you even here?

If we bombed America, the world's output of damaging gas would drop by at least 50%. America has this retarded "We are more important than the world" attitude it seems, they couldn't give a shit how they ruin everything for other people.

America could do much if it backed down on it's weapon production program, but that's a different issue.

Concerning the environmental issues, I'm not really into that - I just have a slight feeling that billions of cars running on everyday petrol will
1. Destroy the environment
2. Deplete most fossile resources on earth.

Hah yeah. Mr Bush says he's concerned about 'environmental' issues. Well in that case Mr Bush, what are you doing with all those nukes?

...And you Mr Blair, why all those nukes you have stockpiled in our country? Hmm?

Oh and they are so concerned about Africa, that's why they give them cancer-ridden vaccines that cause more deaths than save lives.

Nukes are nukes, as long as no one fires them their useless. Unless theres a huge asteroid which would wipe out life on this planet. Then theres a reason to use them.

Cars are cars, look on the good side. Hybrids are coming out

I agree with mop's fact. Most Americas are stuck up dicks who think that slowly killing themselves is a fun thing to do. For example, most have SUV's, not good. They are destroyers of the environment and due to their design are actually more dangerous then a normal. Stupid really, you could get the same thing in a more safer and environmentally cleaner package. Aw well...

Nuke's may be nukes but whose going to use them - and when?

Besides, there are enough Nukes stockpiled on this planet to destroy the entire human race.

+ The billions of dollars spent on millitary 'black budgets'.

There is far more money spent on millitary applications than life saving technology. Enough money in fact to give everyone equal opportunity and fundamental well-beling on this planet.

...And they try to tell us that they are going to 'help' people.

These guys really are in hog-heaven, as Bill would put it.

These guys really are in hog-heaven, as Bill would put it.

Or, as most people would say, they're selfish, stupid, lying, greedy, power-mad bastards.

If we bombed America, the world's output of damaging gas would drop by at least 50%. America has this retarded "We are more important than the world" attitude it seems, they couldn't give a shit how they ruin everything for other people.

What about China? Theyre gonna make way more pollution than we ever did. If 300 million are bad just think what a billion can do.

Damn you, Jahzel! You have fallen.
Encyclop?dia. At least put the 'a' in, even if it's not a dipthong.

Aaaa!! Grammer Nazi!!!

In America we spell it "encyclopedia"

or we could blow up ZL HOUSE DODO ODOO OD * DO DO OOD

You must really like me, Neo-TheOne, giving me all this attention. I already told you, I'm not interested! What part of "I'm heterosexual" do you not understand!?

I KILL YOU F00000000L

Hmmm... yes, he does need a good slapping. Perhaps it's time to slap him with our uber awesome Matrix powers?

I think if we bombed Neo-TheQueer's house it would save the environment! And solve most of the worlds problems too

I think if we bombed Neo-TheQueer's house it would save the environment! And solve most of the worlds problems too

can we use nukes now?

This thread was originally to celebrate 4th july. Now we are raging on about environmental issues which are surprisingly enough nothing to do with this board.

J3r3my has a good point about china. But their are also pretty poor. I dont know much about China economy, i think their the last communist country, Next to cuba.

Unless theres a huge asteroid which would wipe out life on this planet. Then theres a reason to use them.

Sorry, just mucking about. I know nukes are bad. But countrys arent just going to say ''ok, ill dismantle all my nukes okey dokey?'' their are always gonna be aware that other countrys may attack them.

In America we spell it "encyclopedia"

I know. That's why I was saying Jahzel had fallen by spelling it like that.

So what if people attack them!? A country should simply never use nuclear weaponry - Nuclear weapons aren't built for taking down military strengths or dismantle an enemy - they're built to kill civilians - and lots of them.

Yeah, exactly.

ZL, if a country is attacked by nukes? What do you think governments are going to do? Sit their? Not likely. And its not like the UN are going to resolve a nuke war quickly.

Nuclear weapons aren't built for taking down military strengths or dismantle an enemy - they're built to kill civilians - and lots of them.

Well duh. I never mentioned that in my last post anyway. The only nukes that havent been used on citys are ones that were tested out in somewhere like the pacific. Besides, why would you build a bomb that powerful and then use it on a base?

ZL, if a country is attacked by nukes? What do you think governments are going to do? Sit their?

I think they should. How does killing millions more innocent civilians advance their country when their people are dead?

I think they should. How does killing millions more innocent civilians advance their country when their people are dead?

thats not what the governments gonna think is it?

Nowadays it is really easy to pot a missile in mid air and destory it

Wrong, some missles can avoid this, i think the nukes one of them. And governments can always use bombers to drop nukes.

The only time they will use nukes on us is the time that all their crimes are exposed and everybody seeks to revolt. You see, they are cowards.