Damnit guys its REALLY not THAT bad.
And i hate how people keep saying that vista is just XP with more goodies.
98 was based off 95, it was just better.
XP was based off 98, (screw ME and 2000) And that was better.
YES, vista is based off XP, but all in all, vista will be better soon.
Performance bad with vista
Created 17 years ago2007-02-13 22:22:17 UTC by
Tetsu0
Created 17 years ago2007-02-13 22:22:17 UTC by
Tetsu0
Posted 17 years ago2007-02-21 10:08:54 UTC
Post #213228
Posted 17 years ago2007-02-21 10:21:53 UTC
Post #213229
i agree, it only sux for now. it needs time to get some bug fixes.
Posted 17 years ago2007-02-21 10:26:35 UTC
Post #213230
XP wasn't based on 98, at least, structure wise.
95, 98 = DOS
ME, 2000, XP, Vista = NT
I've stated many times why I'm wary of Vista. Can't be bothered doing it again.
95, 98 = DOS
ME, 2000, XP, Vista = NT
I've stated many times why I'm wary of Vista. Can't be bothered doing it again.
Posted 17 years ago2007-02-21 10:28:33 UTC
Post #213231
oh i didn't realise 2000 was an NT descendant as well.
Posted 17 years ago2007-02-21 22:58:14 UTC
Post #213285
Tis.
Posted 17 years ago2007-02-22 03:12:13 UTC
Post #213316
Well the whole... start menu and folder thingy.
It all builds off that, just with improvements here and there.
It all builds off that, just with improvements here and there.
You must be logged in to post a response.