.wad section
Created 19 years ago2004-09-25 13:30:56 UTC by
paulkennedy
Created 19 years ago2004-09-25 13:30:56 UTC by
paulkennedy
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-25 13:30:56 UTC
Post #61954
I think it would be a good idea if there was a section of the website that had people's .wad files. That way they could easily share them if they wanted too. I know it wouldn't be your work if someone else did it, but people might need textures of cities if they live in the rural areas and vise versa. What do you guys think?
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-25 14:34:46 UTC
Post #61965
IMO, it's better to link the to the author's page if someone needs textures and asks for them in the forums. And it saves a bit of bandwith.
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-25 15:05:50 UTC
Post #61974
I don't know internet lingo very well. I've seen IMO and afiak all over the place but I don't know what they mean. Could someone tell me what these (and possibly others) mean?
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-25 16:02:30 UTC
Post #61986
OK, lets be realistic here. If atom won't do the NECESSARY updates to this site, adding a whole .wad section is like saying "Kerry would make a good president."
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-25 17:25:33 UTC
Post #61996
LOL! Good point! David your moved up in my book! Haha!
(I still would like to know some internet lingo by the way)
(I still would like to know some internet lingo by the way)
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-25 17:47:24 UTC
Post #61999
From what I know IMO is In My Opinion and IMHO is In My Honest Opinion, I don't know what's AFAIK.
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-25 17:49:15 UTC
Post #62000
afaik, it's As Far As I Know 
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-25 17:51:41 UTC
Post #62003
and "0mgr0fl" roughly translates as "please slap me, im a geek and i have no friends".
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-25 21:49:20 UTC
Post #62048
That sounds about right ministeve...
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-25 21:52:33 UTC
Post #62049
0mgr0fl.... Slap me!
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-26 00:24:45 UTC
Post #62091
/me wallops Trapt
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-26 04:29:57 UTC
Post #62101
Posted 19 years ago2004-09-26 04:57:01 UTC
Post #62110
Possibly because it's actually www.wikipedia.org
You must be logged in to post a response.