refused to acknowledge UN
Oh right, and america never does that ;).
I cannot see how you would not support a government by the people, run by the people, decided by the people, in order to create equality for all, and protect their human rights...
I for one, believe that the war in Iraq hasn't and won't bring the same level of democracy to the people in Iraq that we see in western countries. It's a ploy to actually get a reason for invading.
It was known by the UN that Iraq had Weapons of Mass destruction
That's not quite how I remember it. The UN advised the US not to attack, and had no proof of existant WMDs.
Think of how easy it is to smuggle these weapons out
Yes, it's easy to smuggle weapons out. But it's not quite as easy to clean up
all evidence of the creation of WMDs. Disposing of hundreds of weapons factories in a matter of weeks or months isn't as easy as smuggling a couple of missiles out.
Also, Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein had as many "ties" as the Bush administration did with him.
Terrorism is killing the innocent out of hatred, and cowerding in the shadows.
I believe terrorism is a way for people to get attention to certain matter. Of course, a certain level of hatred and belief is required to blow oneself up, but the original "reasons" are almost never out of pure "I hate [insert country]".
One could even say that the 'rebels' in Iraq today, fighting american troops, are fighting for their freedom. They have an invading force in their country, and they want it out. Is it so different from fighting Brittish colonists in the 17th century?
Edit: This is what makes forums great - fashioned political discussions. Don't you dare delete this thread.