access speeds. so here:Worst - Processed in a dire 93072 milliseconds
Best - Processed in a speedy 42 milliseconds
Processed in how many milliseconds!?!?!
Created 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:02:46 UTC by
Dorian27
Created 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:02:46 UTC by
Dorian27
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:02:46 UTC
Post #141083
Instead of posting (Edit:spamming) the access speed for TWHL in the shoutbox, i thought that this would be a good place to post your best, and worst access speeds. so here:
Worst - Processed in a dire 93072 milliseconds
Best - Processed in a speedy 42 milliseconds
access speeds. so here:Worst - Processed in a dire 93072 milliseconds
Best - Processed in a speedy 42 milliseconds
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:07:25 UTC
Post #141086
Server provblems tonight, fellas.
Processed in a dire 13119 milliseconds..
Get used to this..
Processed in a dire 13119 milliseconds..
Get used to this..
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:10:34 UTC
Post #141087
err, i thought that was my worst i was wrong.. - Processed in a dire 155584 milliseconds
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:12:07 UTC
Post #141088
Well I think it stopped lagging for me now..
Must have been a temporary problem
Must have been a temporary problem
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:30:12 UTC
Post #141093
Ditto, everything works like a charm now.
Damn server gremlins, chewing the cables...
Edit: A bit sluggish again.
Damn server gremlins, chewing the cables...
Edit: A bit sluggish again.
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:49:01 UTC
Post #141096
Works fine for me.. 
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 15:35:18 UTC
Post #141102
Processed in a dire 43958 milliseconds 
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:08:42 UTC
Post #141113
where does it say how fast its going?
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:10:45 UTC
Post #141114
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:12:38 UTC
Post #141116
Processed in a dire 4523 milliseconds
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:14:15 UTC
Post #141117
In the footer.
Different pages do take different amounts of time to process, you realise? The Links or About pages, for example, being largely static, stick in double-figures, generally, while the front page is, at best, about 200ms.
Different pages do take different amounts of time to process, you realise? The Links or About pages, for example, being largely static, stick in double-figures, generally, while the front page is, at best, about 200ms.
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:17:15 UTC
Post #141121
oh, no, ive had around 80 ms some days, when the server isnt being slowed down by little gremlins chewing on cables..
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:19:04 UTC
Post #141123
On the front page? You can't be serious :|.
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:21:04 UTC
Post #141125
Processed in a pretty quick 92 milliseconds - pretty constant around this figure for this page.
Processed in a plodding 443 milliseconds - front page
Processed in a slow 309 milliseconds - Completed maps page
Processed in an acceptable 254 milliseconds - 24th page of the hostage situation thread
Processed in a plodding 443 milliseconds - front page
Processed in a slow 309 milliseconds - Completed maps page
Processed in an acceptable 254 milliseconds - 24th page of the hostage situation thread
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:21:17 UTC
Post #141126
i kid you not seventh, once the server stops acting up ill send you a screen shot. at my work they use a T1 connection =)
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:23:17 UTC
Post #141130
Your connection speed probably won't affect it, although I can't say for sure. My connection's faster than T1, though ;).
I'll keep an eye out.
I'll keep an eye out.
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:28:49 UTC
Post #141133
Processed in a dire 14023 milliseconds
This happened a few times... This one was the longest..
and yes, the front page.
EDIT:
Happened again: Processed in a dire 42164 milliseconds
Hmmm.....
This happened a few times... This one was the longest..
and yes, the front page.
EDIT:
Happened again: Processed in a dire 42164 milliseconds
Hmmm.....
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:40:57 UTC
Post #141138
This page: processed in a pretty quick 95ms, on 56k dialup! w00t!
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:44:11 UTC
Post #141140
Im gettin aroud 92 on this page. good work frag 
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 17:10:56 UTC
Post #141147
Opening this page I got a quick 96 milliseconds. Think the slowest was around 2000.
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 18:43:44 UTC
Post #141154
Well, for me its on and off...
This page took me 92 milliseconds...
This page took me 92 milliseconds...
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 21:11:02 UTC
Post #141160
Processed in a pretty quick 95 milliseconds
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-13 00:15:39 UTC
Post #141172
Fastest I got was 89 milliseconds
Slowest was around 42 seconds, I'm not kidding.
Slowest was around 42 seconds, I'm not kidding.
You must be logged in to post a response.