Processed in how many milliseconds!?!?! Created 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:02:46 UTC by Dorian27 Dorian27

Created 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:02:46 UTC by Dorian27 Dorian27

Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:02:46 UTC Post #141083
Instead of posting (Edit:spamming) the access speed for TWHL in the shoutbox, i thought that this would be a good place to post your best, and worst ;) access speeds. so here:
Worst - Processed in a dire 93072 milliseconds
Best - Processed in a speedy 42 milliseconds
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:07:25 UTC Post #141086
Server provblems tonight, fellas.
Processed in a dire 13119 milliseconds..
Get used to this.. ;)
Daubster DaubsterVault Dweller
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:10:34 UTC Post #141087
err, i thought that was my worst i was wrong.. - Processed in a dire 155584 milliseconds
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:12:07 UTC Post #141088
Well I think it stopped lagging for me now..
Must have been a temporary problem
Daubster DaubsterVault Dweller
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:30:12 UTC Post #141093
Ditto, everything works like a charm now.

Damn server gremlins, chewing the cables...

Edit: A bit sluggish again.
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 14:49:01 UTC Post #141096
Works fine for me.. :)
Daubster DaubsterVault Dweller
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 15:35:18 UTC Post #141102
Processed in a dire 43958 milliseconds :aghast:
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:08:42 UTC Post #141113
where does it say how fast its going?
Archie ArchieGoodbye Moonmen
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:10:45 UTC Post #141114
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:12:38 UTC Post #141116
Processed in a dire 4523 milliseconds
Archie ArchieGoodbye Moonmen
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:14:15 UTC Post #141117
In the footer.

Different pages do take different amounts of time to process, you realise? The Links or About pages, for example, being largely static, stick in double-figures, generally, while the front page is, at best, about 200ms.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:17:15 UTC Post #141121
oh, no, ive had around 80 ms some days, when the server isnt being slowed down by little gremlins chewing on cables..
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:19:04 UTC Post #141123
On the front page? You can't be serious :|.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:21:04 UTC Post #141125
Processed in a pretty quick 92 milliseconds - pretty constant around this figure for this page.

Processed in a plodding 443 milliseconds - front page

Processed in a slow 309 milliseconds - Completed maps page

Processed in an acceptable 254 milliseconds - 24th page of the hostage situation thread
Archie ArchieGoodbye Moonmen
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:21:17 UTC Post #141126
i kid you not seventh, once the server stops acting up ill send you a screen shot. at my work they use a T1 connection =)
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:23:17 UTC Post #141130
Your connection speed probably won't affect it, although I can't say for sure. My connection's faster than T1, though ;).

I'll keep an eye out.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:28:49 UTC Post #141133
Processed in a dire 14023 milliseconds

This happened a few times... This one was the longest..

and yes, the front page.

EDIT:
Happened again: Processed in a dire 42164 milliseconds

Hmmm.....
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:40:57 UTC Post #141138
This page: processed in a pretty quick 95ms, on 56k dialup! w00t!
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 16:44:11 UTC Post #141140
Im gettin aroud 92 on this page. good work frag :biggrin:
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 17:10:56 UTC Post #141147
Opening this page I got a quick 96 milliseconds. Think the slowest was around 2000.
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 18:43:44 UTC Post #141154
Well, for me its on and off...

This page took me 92 milliseconds...
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-12 21:11:02 UTC Post #141160
Processed in a pretty quick 95 milliseconds
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 19 years ago2005-10-13 00:15:39 UTC Post #141172
Fastest I got was 89 milliseconds

Slowest was around 42 seconds, I'm not kidding.
You must be logged in to post a response.