women in teh army could psown anyone in this forum I'll bet.go look at esmajor's profile (if that is actually a picture of him)... if you can find a woman in the army who can take him... i will shake your hand
Selective Service: Discrimination???
Created 17 years ago2006-11-25 18:08:37 UTC by
Orpheus
Created 17 years ago2006-11-25 18:08:37 UTC by
Orpheus
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 00:51:50 UTC
Post #204212
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 01:12:17 UTC
Post #204213
well duh, every army leans to deal with snipers, and i dont care if i dont get a shot im not eager to kill someone, and since when is jarhead a reliable source for war news?
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 01:31:24 UTC
Post #204215
if you can find a woman in the army who can take him... i will shake your handOh how easy...
1. Flash your tits (boobs/fun bags).
2. This will cause him to be distracted and drooling.
3. Then stab him in the head with an ice-pick.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 14:06:17 UTC
Post #204231
You ever see jarhead? Why does everyone want to be a sniper?Yes, the whole world is accurately portrayed by hollywood. Transformers, Pirate of The Carribean, Spiderman and Superman are all based on real events.
Hello Sargent!I'm sorry, but the US Army isn't like the movie SpyKids. Tweens aren't allowed in. Go back to school and learn how to spell.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 15:35:59 UTC
Post #204240
[quotes]You ever see jarhead? Why does everyone want to be a sniper? Spec. Ops are much more 1337 due to their stealthy ninjaness[/quote]
Mmm, reminds me of BF2. I used to be a sniper, until I realized it was boring, now I spend all day in BF2 sneaking and blowing up tanks with C4 (And getting banned of the Official EA hosted servers for attaching C4 to jeeps and making a car-bomb
) as a Spec-Op boy.
Mmm, reminds me of BF2. I used to be a sniper, until I realized it was boring, now I spend all day in BF2 sneaking and blowing up tanks with C4 (And getting banned of the Official EA hosted servers for attaching C4 to jeeps and making a car-bomb
) as a Spec-Op boy.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 18:35:57 UTC
Post #204256
I personally would want to be in an Armored division. Loader/Driver.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 18:55:09 UTC
Post #204258
Ah, BF2, nothing better.
I personally would want to be in an Armored division. Loader/Driver.So you can chase down your neighbours horribly annoying dog in style?
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 19:31:49 UTC
Post #204260
If I had to be in the army I would go to officer's school. If that doesn't count for some of you then I would pick marines simply because once you make it in that, you are one of the most badass people on this planet. Third pick, move to the UK and be trained as a sniper. Although my ADD might be a problem. I'd be fuckin picking the grass while the target walked across an open lot. 
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 21:42:29 UTC
Post #204272
1. I'm sure a woman could take him. You just keep thinking of frail little women who stay at home all day. I'm thinking a combat trained woman who's down with teh moves.
2. Jarhead is not a Hollywood, but rather a movie made by the soldiers themselves. However, if you would have seen the movie instead of immediately drawing conclusions you would understand my point. Jarhead doesn't portray war news. It portrays the truly shit life soldiers in war lead.
2. Jarhead is not a Hollywood, but rather a movie made by the soldiers themselves. However, if you would have seen the movie instead of immediately drawing conclusions you would understand my point. Jarhead doesn't portray war news. It portrays the truly shit life soldiers in war lead.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 21:44:20 UTC
Post #204274
Jarhead was pretty cool
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 21:45:34 UTC
Post #204275
I'm sorry, but the US Army isn't like the movie SpyKids. Tweens aren't allowed in. Go back to school and learn how to spell.wow, well arnt you a big man?! i never said the army was like spykids you moron, and i didn't spell anything in your quote wrong! so good job making yourself look like an ass
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-27 22:54:58 UTC
Post #204277
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-28 06:27:53 UTC
Post #204302
Actually, it's sergeant. And aren't, too. But spelling is for sissies.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-28 10:00:37 UTC
Post #204312
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-28 13:21:32 UTC
Post #204338
Jarhead is not a HollywoodYour right, its actually Universal studios (from wiki)
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-28 17:34:18 UTC
Post #204357
Actually, it's sergeant. And aren't, too. But spelling is for sissies.ACTUALLY, both forms of Sargent are acceptable and "aren't" wasn't in his quote of me, and spellings for the intelligent
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-28 18:40:58 UTC
Post #204367
ACTUALLY, both forms of Sargent are acceptableNot according to Dictionary.com or Google, or Firefox's spell check. You fail.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-28 19:16:24 UTC
Post #204369
...or Wikidictionary.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 00:33:59 UTC
Post #204396
dictionary.com dosent say its spelled wrong, neither does firefox or google
but that version is the wrong DEFINTION
but that version is the wrong DEFINTION
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 12:31:18 UTC
Post #204432
[quote]Definitions of Sargent on the Web:
* United States painter (born in Italy) known for his society portraits (1856-1925) [/quote]
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 12:51:25 UTC
Post #204433
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 15:52:46 UTC
Post #204458
Thats acceptable? Meh, i guess its understandble since the english language was butchered over there.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 17:37:42 UTC
Post #204474
Sargent is spelled "Sargent" in the USA.i guess....you fail ZombieLoffe
Sergeant is also acceptable.
(IE Spell verifies my claim. heart -)
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 18:07:21 UTC
Post #204478
Actually, it doesn't seem to be spelt "Sargent" in the US according to the army's info site.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 18:57:33 UTC
Post #204492
The US fails, and everyone who lives in it (them?).
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 18:59:00 UTC
Post #204493
Oh yes, we Americans are such failures.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 19:01:50 UTC
Post #204494
whoever has more penis has a higher position ^^
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 19:29:45 UTC
Post #204499
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 20:11:48 UTC
Post #204506
The US fails, and everyone who lives in it (them?).same old regurgitated semi activist anti-American bullshit, yeah theres things i hate about my country (George bush, Vietnam, Iraq war, george bush) but that certainly doesn't mean that we fail, and saying everyone in it fails...that reminds me of another gentleman who made stupid generalizations......now, who was that?......
OH YEAH!
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 20:45:31 UTC
Post #204513
Yeah, all americans seem to hate Bush, still he got re-elected.
GG
GG
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 21:07:58 UTC
Post #204516
That doesn't mean a thing. It was a choice between two evils. Everyone hated both of the candidates.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 21:12:26 UTC
Post #204518
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 21:24:26 UTC
Post #204520
Neither Bush or Kerry was fit for the whitehouse. But that didn't stop Nader from running.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 21:39:12 UTC
Post #204523
they both sucked, so everyone went for bush because they "didn't want to change the president during a war"
besides most of the people that hate bush are the younger generation, and most of us cant vote yet
besides most of the people that hate bush are the younger generation, and most of us cant vote yet
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 22:06:47 UTC
Post #204526
crazy i was quoting from davinci code ^^
btw the fuehrer didn't lose because he made generalizations but because he had no inkling of strategic knowledge? gg two-front war
btw the fuehrer didn't lose because he made generalizations but because he had no inkling of strategic knowledge? gg two-front war
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-29 23:12:39 UTC
Post #204532
whatchu' talkin bout Willis..i mean arcan?
what quote?
oh and i didn't say that shitler lost because of his wicked generalizations, i just said that he DID make wicked generalizations, he lost because the combined might of all us working together at one goal is simply unstoppable...to be we cant all get along and move forward in humanity
P.S. im with you about darfur
what quote?
oh and i didn't say that shitler lost because of his wicked generalizations, i just said that he DID make wicked generalizations, he lost because the combined might of all us working together at one goal is simply unstoppable...to be we cant all get along and move forward in humanity
P.S. im with you about darfur
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-30 11:51:20 UTC
Post #204580
That doesn't mean a thing. It was a choice between two evils. Everyone hated both of the candidates.Vote blank.
Hitler lost because he invaded the motherland, btw. Anyone who's ever tried to conquer Russia's pretty much failed. Besides, my fail comment was hardly serious :P.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-30 12:19:10 UTC
Post #204581
Anyone who's ever tried to conquer Russia's pretty much failedNo one can take the motherland!
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-30 21:05:40 UTC
Post #204678
yeah man, napoleon got his midget as owned getting lured into that cold 
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-30 21:07:48 UTC
Post #204679
yea but thats the french. they always lose. Only good thing about the french is alizee. (in love her 
)
btw the penis and military thing is a quote
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html
)btw the penis and military thing is a quote
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-30 21:12:08 UTC
Post #204680
And Hitler? he tryed. haha, and failed. if he took the capital instead of stalingrad...then, perhaps.
Its just too big, too cold, and has too many people.
Its just too big, too cold, and has too many people.
Posted 17 years ago2006-11-30 21:51:58 UTC
Post #204688
France got pwned.
Edit: You're right, God doesn't have anything to do with this. I have someone else in mind...
*Saw it, had to post it.
No one but nature to fight, France still loses
Edit: You're right, God doesn't have anything to do with this. I have someone else in mind...
Posted 17 years ago2006-12-01 17:03:07 UTC
Post #204736
France got pwned everywhere. they still haven't developed into a stable state. They actually celebrated last years riots by torching cars again. WDF? They always make some dam revolution and couple years later revolt against the system they built 3 years ago.
btw, what did you see? teh triple 666? 0-o
btw, what did you see? teh triple 666? 0-o
Posted 17 years ago2006-12-03 22:08:53 UTC
Post #204977
the French where built for loving and smelling bad, not fighting
Posted 17 years ago2006-12-03 22:28:26 UTC
Post #204981
That's pretty fucked up.
Posted 17 years ago2006-12-04 19:01:38 UTC
Post #205036
but true...
Posted 17 years ago2006-12-04 21:02:28 UTC
Post #205056
The French are a people who like to show their dissatisfaction. I can respect civil disobedience in mass outbreaks. But yeah, the country seems to have a few problems, especially regarding immigrants and assimilation. Not to mention segregation, on more than one level.
Posted 17 years ago2006-12-06 15:11:55 UTC
Post #205232
France has been pwned by just about everyone else in Europe.
Posted 17 years ago2006-12-06 15:56:31 UTC
Post #205236
The reason there is only a male "call of duty" form is because Millitary forces dont want women fighting for them, plain and simple. If you ran an army would you seriously have open female ranks?
Millitary forces KNOW they can Hammer 90% of males into an effective fighting machine. I would be surprised if you could train 50% of women to be effective combat units (and not just break down and cry on the battle feild).
Can you imagine what would happen if you send a female betallion into battle against a male enemy? Your army would be the laughing stock of the Earth, plus they would be masacred. lol
Millitary forces KNOW they can Hammer 90% of males into an effective fighting machine. I would be surprised if you could train 50% of women to be effective combat units (and not just break down and cry on the battle feild).
Can you imagine what would happen if you send a female betallion into battle against a male enemy? Your army would be the laughing stock of the Earth, plus they would be masacred. lol
Posted 17 years ago2006-12-06 17:54:47 UTC
Post #205244
plus they would probably get raped
You must be logged in to post a response.