gif.pictures
Created 19 years ago2005-01-21 11:11:06 UTC by
Sajo
Created 19 years ago2005-01-21 11:11:06 UTC by
Sajo
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 11:11:06 UTC
Post #84815
Let us use gif.pictures... :
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 11:27:45 UTC
Post #84817
As avatars?
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 11:27:53 UTC
Post #84818
The avs are fine the way they are.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 11:30:20 UTC
Post #84820
.gifs would rock. I'm sick of these low quality .jpgs with no transparent.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 12:14:29 UTC
Post #84824
yes, .gifs would give some colorfull mood to the site 
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 12:56:23 UTC
Post #84828
or we'd be flooded with wave after wave of noob with obscene, unfunny animated avatars. we've had this argument on twhl before. the answer is always no.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 14:34:44 UTC
Post #84870
no, no, no, no, no, yes, no, no, no, NO!
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 15:07:37 UTC
Post #84873
It would be more lag..
And,, how do you make a .gif picture?
And,, how do you make a .gif picture?
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 15:43:58 UTC
Post #84884
omg. just leave. dont ask stupid qustions please.
I would HATE gifs. It would be annoying. The image size would have to be reduced.
I would HATE gifs. It would be annoying. The image size would have to be reduced.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 15:58:15 UTC
Post #84892
I would HATE gifs. It would be annoying. The image size would have to be reduced.Actually no, there's a size limit.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 15:59:19 UTC
Post #84894
Meh, I don't fancy GIFs.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 15:59:27 UTC
Post #84895
Size limit as in file size.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 16:06:33 UTC
Post #84901
No Gifs, No flash. 
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 16:08:20 UTC
Post #84906
It would be more lag..yeah,you are right : That was logical
omg. just leave. dont ask stupid qustions please.This was not
Madcow is right at this ,it would cause more lag then already ...I cant imagine that
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 16:12:32 UTC
Post #84910
Its open to abuse first of all - and its distracting.
What's more important? what people say? or the stupid animation in their avatar?
What's more important? what people say? or the stupid animation in their avatar?
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 19:19:40 UTC
Post #84956
Not size as in file size. Size as in pixels.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 21:25:03 UTC
Post #84972
Agrees with Kol
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 21:37:00 UTC
Post #84975
What do you reckon respectable people will do? Put animated porn in their avatars?
Seriously, give the people some trust - just cause you enable animation doesn't mean "the mob" will turn it into some monster.
Besides, there are mods here to enforce strict avatar-rules.
Seriously, give the people some trust - just cause you enable animation doesn't mean "the mob" will turn it into some monster.
Besides, there are mods here to enforce strict avatar-rules.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 22:04:00 UTC
Post #84980
and the new IP ban system just reinforces all rules.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-21 23:54:53 UTC
Post #84984
What is it with you and the IP ban system :
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 00:04:17 UTC
Post #84987
I want to try it 
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 00:07:52 UTC
Post #84993
Let's try it on IEMC.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 00:09:41 UTC
Post #84995
how about stfu trapt and get a life
k? thnx
k? thnx
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 01:29:40 UTC
Post #84998
Fully agree, we should test the IP ban system...
Why not start with the most unhelpful person?
[quote]omg. just leave. dont ask stupid qustions please.
Posted on 22 Jan 05 04:43 by ieatmonkeychow [/quote]
Why not start with the most unhelpful person?
[quote]omg. just leave. dont ask stupid qustions please.
Posted on 22 Jan 05 04:43 by ieatmonkeychow [/quote]
Shoutbox: 22 Jan 05 13:11 ieatmonkeychow:Looks like I found a candidate without having to leave this thread!!
go to hell and die trapt
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 03:31:59 UTC
Post #85006
And its not me! Wpw, where did I come from?!
On a more subject bound note, NO GIFS! NO! Someone at the amx website has a signature gif that is so powerful my computer crashes if I have the screen on it for too long (which is a matter of seconds by the way)
On a more subject bound note, NO GIFS! NO! Someone at the amx website has a signature gif that is so powerful my computer crashes if I have the screen on it for too long (which is a matter of seconds by the way)
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 05:49:48 UTC
Post #85011
A gif file crashes your computer?? Jeez, what're you running, a pocket organiser?
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 06:21:56 UTC
Post #85012
WCD, that's ridiculous. Are you using Netscape 2.0?
Transparency-utilising GIFs'd be good, but there's no way to prevent animations, far as I know, and they'd be dumb, lame, irritating, et cetera.
Transparency-utilising GIFs'd be good, but there's no way to prevent animations, far as I know, and they'd be dumb, lame, irritating, et cetera.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 08:13:52 UTC
Post #85020
What about .pngs?
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 09:19:33 UTC
Post #85025
That'd be quite dastardly cunning. Ask atom.
stamps idea with his approval
stamps idea with his approval
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 09:58:08 UTC
Post #85032
It would be nice to let us link to offsite images as opposed to uploading - uploading sets the jpg quality far too low 
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 11:30:03 UTC
Post #85040
Only if you have a silly big avatar :P.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 12:23:48 UTC
Post #85044
Hmmm, it would be nice to have the [img] tags again. Why dont they work?
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 13:33:16 UTC
Post #85054
[IMG]?
I've been a member here in over 150 days.. Never seen it.
:
I've been a member here in over 150 days.. Never seen it.
:
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 14:58:50 UTC
Post #85061
they were removed after the image posting was abused.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 14:59:37 UTC
Post #85062
[img] allows you to post images - it was turned off. Oh the good old days of [img]...
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 15:08:43 UTC
Post #85066
So why dont they put it up again? It cant be that bad...
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 18:48:52 UTC
Post #85089
It was.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 20:06:00 UTC
Post #85099
What happend then exactly?
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 21:04:14 UTC
Post #85130
Twhl should stay the way it is!
Otherwise we are looking at a snarkpit lookalike
Otherwise we are looking at a snarkpit lookalike
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 21:24:43 UTC
Post #85132
Snarkpit happens to be a well functioning and good and helpful communtiy, last time I checked.
habboi, just cause you got banned doesn't mean it's bad.
habboi, just cause you got banned doesn't mean it's bad.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 22:09:50 UTC
Post #85138
Snarkpit does indeed have a good community.
And so do we.
And so do we.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 22:17:48 UTC
Post #85142
Snarkpit has a good community, but there site sux, I hate the coloring, hurts my eyes.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 01:27:26 UTC
Post #85182
[quote]Fully agree, we should test the IP ban system...
Why not start with the most unhelpful person?
Quote:
omg. just leave. dont ask stupid qustions please.
Posted on 22 Jan 05 04:43 by ieatmonkeychow
Quote:
Shoutbox: 22 Jan 05 13:11 ieatmonkeychow:
go to hell and die trapt
Looks like I found a candidate without having to leave this thread!![/quote]
Have you seen what trapt has been saying to me? i guess not.
And i hate you. just because you say shiat about that all the time.
Why not start with the most unhelpful person?
Quote:
omg. just leave. dont ask stupid qustions please.
Posted on 22 Jan 05 04:43 by ieatmonkeychow
Quote:
Shoutbox: 22 Jan 05 13:11 ieatmonkeychow:
go to hell and die trapt
Looks like I found a candidate without having to leave this thread!![/quote]
Have you seen what trapt has been saying to me? i guess not.
And i hate you.
just because you say shiat about that all the time.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 01:28:06 UTC
Post #85183
and i want the img stuff back.
It gave the forums a certain feeling of pwer to the people.
It gave the forums a certain feeling of pwer to the people.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 02:34:36 UTC
Post #85187
...certain power to post Goatse.
And quit making fun of my name, foo >;o
And quit making fun of my name, foo >;o
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 02:38:19 UTC
Post #85189
Teh Banstick is hungry.
"Who should we test you on Banstick?"
"Who should we test you on Banstick?"
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 02:39:04 UTC
Post #85190
The banstick is indeed hungry. It must feed...
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 03:07:13 UTC
Post #85198
sorry, rabid. it was funneh. 
yah, the goatse is wrong...
yah, the goatse is wrong...
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 05:54:42 UTC
Post #85204
Feed upon the flesh of the living.
brandishes it meanacingly
brandishes it meanacingly
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 06:43:18 UTC
Post #85208
I've upgraded to the BanCannon?.
And after today's rather colourful adventures on IRC, I might have to use it. Kiddin'
And after today's rather colourful adventures on IRC, I might have to use it. Kiddin'
You must be logged in to post a response.