still can't port forward, and i need a server, so here's my map.
http://www.cstrike-planet.com/maps?id=480
screenshots are available at the site.
i'd say my %'s are 85%-15% approve/disapprove of this map. it's a multi-story bomb map. 4 stories with a basement/attic. other features are a gate/portal, respawn deathtrap in attic, warning siren for backdoor bomb-site entrance, secret room with one-way door access only, and so on. 40 player-spawn map, and is created for close range play and sniper play. tons of fun, just need a server to run. download and reply please. let me know if you can run it on your server, because this is a great cs:source map. thanks! mudbd@wiu.edu or reply to this forum thread.
de_fallout is beautiful [closed]
Created 19 years ago2005-02-28 01:46:22 UTC by
trepidation
Created 19 years ago2005-02-28 01:46:22 UTC by
trepidation
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-28 01:46:22 UTC
Post #94069
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-28 01:49:06 UTC
Post #94070
btw...the story is....a fallout shelter for CT's, and the construction project is being funded by selling stolen paintings. T's need to blow it up. simple, but not simple map. have fun with this one! not easy. plenty of access to each room. good hiding spots, lots of availability to different areas. l8r
Posted 19 years ago2005-02-28 18:43:49 UTC
Post #94247
Dude, that's not beautiful. Really.
Practise.
Practise.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-02 04:54:27 UTC
Post #94550
to most it is a fantastic level, i hope more play it. sorry that you don't feel the same. 
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-02 05:08:18 UTC
Post #94551
Its horrible. And that is from seeing the screenshots alone
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-02 05:46:10 UTC
Post #94552
It might well be excellently laid-out, but it really doesn't look too impressive. Please practise
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-02 07:09:49 UTC
Post #94557
I wouldn't go as far as calling it horrible, but it seems kinda thoughtlessly made, random, and undetailed. But it isn't horrible, especially compared to the other rubbish maps coming out. :/
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-02 07:33:40 UTC
Post #94559
Blocky. Uuuurf.
And some textures are madly scaled (Here).
And some textures are madly scaled (Here).
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-02 07:51:16 UTC
Post #94561
Floor textures used in walls, beds that look like tombstones... I cant really give a full opinion until I see it and play it.
Just one thing, only after I saw water in a flooded bathroom in one of the screenshots, did I notice this map was for a Source Engine game.
Just one thing, only after I saw water in a flooded bathroom in one of the screenshots, did I notice this map was for a Source Engine game.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-02 09:15:21 UTC
Post #94566
It really is source? wow.........
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-02 11:59:58 UTC
Post #94585
Yeah, id really rethink some of those textures, like you put a tile floor on the ceiling, also the walls are incredibly thin, especially if its supposed to be a fallout shelter, i would think those walls would be thick as hell.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-02 12:02:30 UTC
Post #94586
...crap 
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-02 14:25:06 UTC
Post #94601
Yeh I'v played it reviewed it last time you tried advertising it and I have come to the conclusion: Learn to model. Instead of making a blocky 3 brush bed that looks shite.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-08 19:06:41 UTC
Post #95932
oh and im makeing a map called cs_gheto good piece of work so far
but how are some of you people so good at mapping (not including trepidation)
but how are some of you people so good at mapping (not including trepidation)
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-08 22:24:52 UTC
Post #95963
Yeah I would have to agree that it isn't too great at all. You said
"to most it is a fantastic level". I don't know what you mean by that. But if you refer to the first maps ever released, yeah that was decent compared to them. But the first levels were released extremely quickly, and it was everyones first attempt at a map. Now maps that have been released lately are much more detailed as people have had more time and more experience.
Compared to the maps then, its ok. Compared to the maps now, I am sorry to say it, but it sucks.
"to most it is a fantastic level". I don't know what you mean by that. But if you refer to the first maps ever released, yeah that was decent compared to them. But the first levels were released extremely quickly, and it was everyones first attempt at a map. Now maps that have been released lately are much more detailed as people have had more time and more experience.
Compared to the maps then, its ok. Compared to the maps now, I am sorry to say it, but it sucks.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-09 05:40:02 UTC
Post #96005
i'd say my %'s are 85%-15% approve/disapprove of this map.LOL..!
Screenies look super-shitty btw, not downloading.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-09 05:46:01 UTC
Post #96006
So 90s.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-09 17:34:31 UTC
Post #96056
lol @ jaardsi
so 1890s
so 1890s
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-09 23:09:40 UTC
Post #96090
gah, screenys scared me after i read the post, sounded good to. then i played it and my eyes blured becasue i had been playing some of Kasbergs maps + farcry.
gameplay is good though, but some more cover in some places would be appriated. and add more detail.
this would be good only, i stress the only, if it was your first or second map.
gameplay is good though, but some more cover in some places would be appriated. and add more detail.
this would be good only, i stress the only, if it was your first or second map.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-09 23:37:35 UTC
Post #96094
to most it is a fantastic levelThis is mainly because mainstream CS:S players like anything that's not a block map, and if something's really good, they tend to ignore it as being 'crap' or over their skill level and point out extremely minor faults with it.
/2 cents
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-10 04:58:07 UTC
Post #96111
de_Tides...
Nice map, looks good, plays well.
but no-one plays it
Nice map, looks good, plays well.
but no-one plays it
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-10 05:17:49 UTC
Post #96112
is that supposed to be a Source map? cause the textures look like the original HL. it is far from beautiful. and whos calling it "fantastic"? a bunch of 8 year olds? ive seen more beautful maps on the original CS...
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-10 06:27:57 UTC
Post #96121
Wow! It looks like a building thats been put through a blender. Whats with the texturing.
Honest opinion : Fugly and Blocky.
Honest opinion : Fugly and Blocky.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-10 11:34:28 UTC
Post #96143
i could put something like that together in like 10 mins. put some more time and effort into it.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-10 14:57:49 UTC
Post #96180
Now Now be nice, he might of just of been born crap.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-10 16:15:04 UTC
Post #96195
Now that was harsh 
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-11 16:40:15 UTC
Post #96390
True
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-12 06:09:09 UTC
Post #96446
if you want to really make that map "beatiful" scale down the textures and use some bump mapping at least...not to mention getting the proportions fixed and detailing stuff.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-14 04:12:01 UTC
Post #96752
I think this map would be really fun! But it is not good mapping....
Seeing the simplicity of this map it should not be source
But to me it looks like one of those "fun" maps that are not good to show off but enjoyable to play.
Seeing the simplicity of this map it should not be source
But to me it looks like one of those "fun" maps that are not good to show off but enjoyable to play.
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-25 18:46:24 UTC
Post #99081
...
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-25 19:37:11 UTC
Post #99089
remind me to never post any of my maps! 
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-25 20:29:16 UTC
Post #99094
why? are they as bad as this one?
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-25 20:42:41 UTC
Post #99098
lol. im having trouble just getting mine running. could map basic maps for hl1/c, but for some reson i cant get it to go, no leaks or anything (under me thread). But i mean if hes a new mapper just completing a decent sized map is an accomplishment. And something like that could take literally 3-4 times longer for a newer mapper than a veterine
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-25 21:06:50 UTC
Post #99100
It might be an accomplishment, but it's strange to start a thread with a topic name that doesnt convince us yet 
I think I haven't made a forum thread for any of my 26 (soon 28) maps even though I think some of them are beautiful. But I guess it's okay to do so... My first, second and third maps were nothing to write home about (that's why they cant be found in the map vault) but they were still fun to play
I think I haven't made a forum thread for any of my 26 (soon 28) maps even though I think some of them are beautiful. But I guess it's okay to do so... My first, second and third maps were nothing to write home about (that's why they cant be found in the map vault) but they were still fun to play
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-25 21:20:50 UTC
Post #99102
but still, poorly made maps can still be fun- take iceworld, falling, box thing or whatever. fun to play, but "beutiful" would be a stretch for any of them
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-26 07:00:50 UTC
Post #99158
Maybe, but those maps are not cstrike, they are just a sort of team deathmatch with CS weapons.
I think so much more is possible with CS:Source
I think so much more is possible with CS:Source
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-26 08:40:38 UTC
Post #99159
Talking About Simble Unbeutiful Maps; Have any of you played DM:Killbox! Its the best map out there!
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-26 08:47:19 UTC
Post #99161
this map looks like shit!
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-26 09:39:34 UTC
Post #99172
It is!
Posted 19 years ago2005-03-26 13:51:14 UTC
Post #99210
This thread has been going for a month, and Mr. Dation hasn't been here for the last twenty-three. Time to die.
You must be logged in to post a response.