http://www.danhall.co.uk/
Hola! oh another new 1
Created 19 years ago2005-05-20 08:49:40 UTC by
96a2107
Created 19 years ago2005-05-20 08:49:40 UTC by
96a2107
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-20 08:49:40 UTC
Post #110261
Ive been workin on this site for 2 days, decided to dump the old tables and borders look for a funky new css layered page (i hear you say ohhhh) tell me what ya think, and before anyone says 'THERES NO CONTENT' i need your critical appraisal of my design at the mo, the contents comin later
http://www.danhall.co.uk/
http://www.danhall.co.uk/
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-20 09:29:36 UTC
Post #110264
Very nice, very flashy and yet clean.
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-20 09:57:04 UTC
Post #110266
It looks great.. except for the wallpaper (dragon or whatever..)
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-20 10:32:58 UTC
Post #110268
Ahhh, i quite liked the dragon, i needed ideas on what too put in the white space cause i think it looks a tad bare without somin there, any ideas for a groovy background peeps ?? 
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-20 18:22:41 UTC
Post #110330
You like the iframes.... dont you?
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-20 18:24:32 UTC
Post #110331
Yeah i do its the logical choice for the layout i wanted there, so i jus went with it, oh the day when i hear a nice comment from you will never come
its the logical choice for the layout i wanted there, so i jus went with it, oh the day when i hear a nice comment from you will never come
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-20 18:25:48 UTC
Post #110332
I really like it, i do.
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-20 18:27:06 UTC
Post #110333
wow a nice 1, i take it back 
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-21 04:19:56 UTC
Post #110374
Best viewed in 1152x864Read: "designed poorly and without consideration of the majority of web users".
Sorry if that seems harsh :P.
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-21 05:20:15 UTC
Post #110378
Yes, 'best viewed' but it still caters for if your in any different resoloution (i hope) :S
(i hope) :S
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-21 06:37:35 UTC
Post #110383
It's just about usable at exactly 800x600 (window size, not res) and alright at 1024x768. 1280x1024, of course, it's fine.
IFRAMEs aren't exactly great, though. People scroll, they want everything to move. There doesn't seem to be any need for them, so just do it the 'modern' (post-'99) way ;).
IFRAMEs aren't exactly great, though. People scroll, they want everything to move. There doesn't seem to be any need for them, so just do it the 'modern' (post-'99) way ;).
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-21 08:50:39 UTC
Post #110397
I would scrap the iframe, but i hate frames and is there any other way of adding the content into a page and have it size fittlingly? :
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-21 08:59:13 UTC
Post #110399
I think it looks really good 
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-21 09:10:58 UTC
Post #110406
cheers dude anyone got any ideas on how to do this thang without iframes :
anyone got any ideas on how to do this thang without iframes :
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-21 10:34:11 UTC
Post #110410
Uh, CSS? Even tables, if you're too lazy for that :P.
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-21 11:20:59 UTC
Post #110417
Ahh yes CSS, ermm, well my site is all layed out and text formatted with CSS, im pretty new to it and learnt it all from tutorials, how might i do this with CSS?
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-21 12:30:10 UTC
Post #110424
Have a look at w3schools. I'm sure some of the regulars on IRC will be able to give you a hand too.
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-21 12:47:03 UTC
Post #110429
Yer thats where ive been learning it, couldnt see anything there, dya mean theres a magical thing in CSS that can load pages into a layer, say it be true need guidance pleeeaasee helppp 
need guidance pleeeaasee helppp 
Posted 19 years ago2005-05-21 13:11:01 UTC
Post #110431
Posted 19 years ago2005-06-07 12:59:52 UTC
Post #113116
Thought i'd revive this thered so ya can see my current progress, what dya think
http://www.danhall.co.uk
http://www.danhall.co.uk
Posted 19 years ago2005-06-07 13:04:41 UTC
Post #113118
Good, althought I did notice you nicked the brent picture from my journal! (DOn't worry though because I nicked it from someone else too!)
(DOn't worry though because I nicked it from someone else too!)
Posted 19 years ago2005-06-07 13:12:28 UTC
Post #113121
Couldnt help it such a wicked piccy
such a wicked piccy
Posted 19 years ago2005-06-07 15:40:41 UTC
Post #113149
The document located at <http://www.danhall.co.uk/index.php> was checked and found to be valid HTML 4.01 Transitional. This means that the resource in question identified itself as "HTML 4.01 Transitional" and that we successfully performed a formal validation using an SGML or XML Parser (depending on the markup language used).Yay.
Posted 19 years ago2005-06-07 16:44:18 UTC
Post #113156
Posted 19 years ago2005-06-07 16:45:06 UTC
Post #113157
Although just slightly bigger than my site
Posted 19 years ago2005-06-07 17:23:47 UTC
Post #113174
Hm, a lot of those look like mistakes on the parser's part.
Posted 19 years ago2005-06-07 20:42:12 UTC
Post #113188
Yer it is, the parser picks up on stupid things, soem things that would make some features unable to be used if taken waya, most ghey :
Posted 19 years ago2005-06-08 03:41:45 UTC
Post #113209
Love the david brent thing.
You must be logged in to post a response.