da omfg list of dust remakes Created 18 years ago2006-01-02 18:39:24 UTC by J.C J.C

Created 18 years ago2006-01-02 18:39:24 UTC by J.C J.C

Posted 18 years ago2006-01-02 18:39:24 UTC Post #155870
was bored, decided to try to settle a list of all the remakes that have been done on dust ...

http://www.de-raid.net/dustremakeslist.html

sorry :nervous: ...

feel free to report other "maps" that have not been added in this great webpage ...
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-02 18:45:39 UTC Post #155872
Interesting.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-02 20:57:44 UTC Post #155887
Omg theres a lot there!
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-02 21:57:01 UTC Post #155890
I don't really see the point.
Good work, I guess.
ChickenFist ChickenFist<Witty Title>
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-03 07:27:50 UTC Post #155944
I don't really see the point.
The point is about the same as doing those crappy maps :)

More seriously, if for example you got a l33t CS roxor who come here and start to spam you all about his great map fun yeah GG etc, just send him there ...
Good work, I guess.
Two hours of work actually, and only 30-40% completed :roll: ...
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-03 07:54:33 UTC Post #155951
Sheesh! Why is dust so popular for crap remakes? I don't understand it!
AJ AJGlorious Overlord
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-03 08:07:58 UTC Post #155955
lol, not many of good quality kind
Madcow MadcowSpy zappin my udder
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-03 11:46:27 UTC Post #155979
I first thought there were only crappy remakes, but got surprised there are some really nice dust-like maps too, and think it's a good point to add them in the page, to show all those fake mappers what really means a "map" ...
Sheesh! Why is dust so popular for crap remakes? I don't understand it!
I already wondered myself, and after gathered those urls, read some articles, dozens of forums topics about "mappers" who are presenting "the" remake of dust, I concluded that :

_most maps use the name (dust) and the look (the textures) because of its popularity (they litteraly do "remakes", I mean something with the same cover, showed the same way, but nothing original inside the box),
_as almost nobody used the gameplay of dust, the gameplay itself is not an important factor (for the mappers I mean),

but

_the problem is that dust is mainly popular especially because of its gameplay, and most remakes mappers simply didn't understand that point, and are clearly nubs who didn't even understand the basics and really should STFU (confirmed by the lack of details, originality, gameplay, well, everything in their "maps").

dust is shining for those players/mappers, they are so far from anything, so far from the idea of dignity, from originality, from pride etc, that they are just trying to gather this light, put themselves between this light and the players, to try to exist by themselves, while they cannot because they are totally transparent, they are nothing but idiots who think it just needs to add "dust" in their map name to become ... somebody, but they totally missed the point ...
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-03 12:45:15 UTC Post #155990
your'e damn right.
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-03 14:21:10 UTC Post #156005
Not totally, these maps are most downloaded than the one we worked on for monthes : ...
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-03 14:31:13 UTC Post #156007
thats because the average cs player is a complete idiot who thinks awp_map has stunning architecture.. its one of the reasons i gave up CS.. everybody who is anybody is a dipshit ass
Archie ArchieGoodbye Moonmen
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-03 18:03:05 UTC Post #156060
the CS gamers community splitted into two very different categories : those who play public servers (mostly "FFA" games on dust/dust2/aztec, if not on "aim" and "fun" maps), and those who play on private servers (who do "warz", mostly on "official" maps).

I was about to give up CS myself when somebody told me "if you play only on public FFA servers, that's normal you are pissed, leave them and come on irc/teamspeak and join some "gathers"", then I realized the "true" players were still existing, they just went in the underground side of CS : while they are much more demanding than the average player you are talking about, working with them is much more interesting and rewarding in my opinion ...
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-03 21:36:54 UTC Post #156091
Yeesh. It's only a matter of time before someone makes a map called "de_eatmydust."
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-04 00:34:49 UTC Post #156096
I have made one boxtop............. on the inside...
TheGrimReafer TheGrimReaferADMININATOR
Posted 18 years ago2006-01-24 15:15:57 UTC Post #159371
that list doenst even cover the half of it yet only a handful are of quality and can be played over and over again. I enjoy the good dust maps which usually resemble the originals in style lighting and gameplay and the dm type are good too really depending on the layout. the texes will never get old you can just replace the cs_dust.wad http://www.counterstrike-games.net/include.php?path=content/overview.php&catid=68&type=4

im getting bored of the few that are really good. if any good mapper is or will create a great map like de_dust4ever or de_dust2vs2 for example, i'd be honored to tip you a little $ for your quality efforts. let me know.
You must be logged in to post a response.