Changing avatar Created 19 years ago2005-01-22 18:49:53 UTC by PTS PTS

Created 19 years ago2005-01-22 18:49:53 UTC by PTS PTS

Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 18:49:53 UTC Post #85090
So, now I know the truth - this site doesn't like me! Or atleast it likes my current avatar SO much that it doesn't allow me to change it. What's wrong?
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 19:05:57 UTC Post #85094
Just upload the same thingy like 3 times, then select custom avatar (even if it isn't the one you uploaded), then reload your browser and it should be there.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 20:06:01 UTC Post #85100
Click Refresh, you fool! I can see the new (proudly liberal) one. :D
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 20:28:03 UTC Post #85111
You guys can taake that extremely imature "proudly stupid" things off your av.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 20:49:41 UTC Post #85120
Haha fucking hell...
You just like super contradicted yourself dude...
Calling them imature..then calling them stupid...

Dear god..you amaze me with your techno babble that you call linguistics..
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 21:07:18 UTC Post #85131
lmao, "proudly stupid"?
haven't you learned what liberalism means?
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 22:08:15 UTC Post #85137
LIberalism=progressiveism, progressiveism=jumping off a cliff.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 22:18:43 UTC Post #85143
ooh... we have a republican here....... :S
The whole freedom isnt free thing is true though, Bush's Inauguration cost more than the amount they have sent to areas effected by the recent Tsunami.....mmmm Freedom!
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 23:24:11 UTC Post #85162
Definition: (what is this, the 4th time im posting it?)
A political philosophy "historically associated with the idea of freedom: the civil freedom of the individual: free political institutions; freedom of religion; free enterprise and free trade in economics." In its contemporary form, liberalism includes a belief in democratic capitalism, and in the duty of the state to alleviate social ills, and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. (Alan Bullock and Oliver Stallybrass (eds.), The Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought (London 1977), 347). Political parties calling themselves "Liberal" do not always reflect "liberal" values.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 23:29:49 UTC Post #85163
/me ponders if anyone noticed his av change
RabidMonkey RabidMonkeymapmapmapfapmap
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-22 23:50:04 UTC Post #85164
Here we go againe... I must say that 'proudly' any thing regarding politics has no place in this forum. Somebody please say you agree. Political and Religious views are very effective tools to divde a community such as this.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 00:41:26 UTC Post #85171
I agree, thats why I want them to take down there imature avs that say somthing they don't even understand correctly
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 01:15:26 UTC Post #85176
Rileymo, I understand your point of view, but by saying 'they don't understand correctly' your adding fuel to the fire. Your AV qualifies as an offender too BTW ;)

Now somebody go into problem maps and fix my damn Mobius Strip :P
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 01:23:04 UTC Post #85178
yay! lets break out the PLs!
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 02:54:18 UTC Post #85191
If my av is offensive, then everything is offensive.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 03:06:22 UTC Post #85197
no one said it is...
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 03:19:24 UTC Post #85199
It's not offensive, but here--a HL mapping site--is not the place for it. Even if it isn't your intent, your AV implys political conservatism. Not that that's a bad thing ;)

The PL's are overtly political, which I'm surprised so few complain about.

I'm not suggesting outlawing political AVs, It's just my opinion they're inappropriate.

[sarcasm]Bush Rules!!!!![/sarcasm]
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 06:03:07 UTC Post #85207
Hey, I didn't either, Rabid.

Super-subtle. Very cunning.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 07:22:32 UTC Post #85210
Why do you take offense of the PL thing?

And, how exactly do we not understand it?
Bushie fewl.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 07:52:41 UTC Post #85213
Rileymo's av isn't offensive...but it's very pro-military :x
LOOK AT ALL THE ARMED FORCES LOGOS IN IT!

Pacifism forever! Liberals forever!

If you don't understand my av, it's a contradiction of America today (which is actually very right wing).
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 08:01:37 UTC Post #85215
Mine is just a cute jak-3 firing the board cannons, pods and the normal top-mounted mg.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 10:16:12 UTC Post #85220
Yak. In English, anyway - technically, I imagine... hm, that's interesting. I suspect it's either "zhak", or what you said :)
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 11:25:37 UTC Post #85232
Woeps, a type. As far as i know it is also Yak in russian. The same as Antonov and Sturmovik.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 12:21:41 UTC Post #85236
What is that from?
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 13:01:18 UTC Post #85246
WWII.

Communist Russia vs. Nazi Germany was basiclly evil vs. evil.
Although I will say that the Nazi's were "more" evil.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 14:07:22 UTC Post #85249
You're so wrong. Stalin killed a lot more people than Hitler did. Rileymo, no-one really cares about your beliefs. We're just proud that we're liberal!
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 14:09:16 UTC Post #85250
At least he didn't make handbags from people, Hitler did. :zonked:
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 14:22:52 UTC Post #85252
See I mean? I could say the sky was blue, and you would argue that its purple!
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 14:24:41 UTC Post #85253
I didnt mean what war. I meant from like what game?
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 14:25:50 UTC Post #85255
Janes maybe?
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 14:37:32 UTC Post #85262
Hitler killed 5-15million, Stalin killed 15-40million and Mao killed 15-30million.
Hitler killed jews & other "low-races"
Stalin killed his own people.. so did Mao.
You cant say who is the baddest..
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 14:39:04 UTC Post #85263
they were fucked up all 3 of 'em. nuff said.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 14:52:21 UTC Post #85276
thats sick. :confused:
Luke LukeLuke
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 15:49:53 UTC Post #85283
btw, jews declared a war against nazis before WWII.. Would there be so many victims without that? IMO, Yes. But Who Knows..
Hitler's "low-race" definition was weird.. all races that helped him = good
There was 200 hindus fighting with nazis ;)
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 15:53:00 UTC Post #85285
There reallly is no comparision, they were both wrong.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 16:08:23 UTC Post #85295
Its all about the planes!

On the 1 side we have the Messerschmit and the Focke Wulf and on the 'commie' side we have the Yak, Sturmovik, and the La. The La had a big advantages over the germans that it could reach higher speeds on any altitude. They lured the waiting messerschmit's from the higher alltitudes and when they came low enough they struk in deadly packs. Many german pilots where killed by this technique. But if a la-5 went to high it was doomed to be taken down by the messerschmits whom where supperior on that hight.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 16:10:31 UTC Post #85296
Good One pepper ;)
Sturmovik<3 I just find it so sexy =)
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 16:12:10 UTC Post #85297
Wut bout the Stuka? Italian, wasn't it (I've really got no idea)?

Rileymo: Your arguements are pretty much always "You're wrong I'm right. If you say I'm wrong, you're an idiot".
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 16:45:36 UTC Post #85306
Can't be exactly "Yak", they don't have a sound like that.

Anyway, I'm not talking practical communism, I'm talking idealistic communism. Difference.
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 17:09:05 UTC Post #85323
The Stuka is developed by the germans to surve as a dive bomber-semi fighter. When they discovered The Stuka 87 needed escort fighter the developed the me-110. Soon this escort fighter needed his own escort to stay alive. The big brother of the Stuke 87 is the 88. A giant bomber whom was powerfull and deadly in big pacts.

you confuse it wiht Italy because Hitler tested The s-87 there in the civial war. But it might have been in spain, im not sure.

And i really think it was called Yak 7th.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 17:52:00 UTC Post #85340
I give up :P
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-23 18:01:23 UTC Post #85348
Me as well.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-24 08:20:50 UTC Post #85434
Yay, planes :)
Seventh-Monkey Seventh-MonkeyPretty nifty
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-24 11:34:42 UTC Post #85458
Planes rock! And the Stuka 87 was used in the Spanish civilian war.
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-24 12:12:20 UTC Post #85465
The only thing I can say is good about Rileymo's av is that it correctly sums up the US Government's idea of 'freedom' and the phoney 'war on terror'.

America stands for freedom, yet in order to 'fight against terror' you can't have freedom because it aids terrorism.

People are having their freedom, rights, and the constitution systematically destroyed in this phoney war on terror, 'the war on freedom' more like.

The real terrorists are the Millitary Industrial Complex who are involved in all the terror attacks.
"The army! We do more things than most people do at 6:00!' - '...man, is that supposed to get me to join? I get up at 8 - and get shot at - great..."
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-24 12:31:26 UTC Post #85468
Indeed jahzel. True words.

and,
Anyway, I'm not talking practical communism, I'm talking idealistic communism. Difference.
Same. This av is only there for provokial reasons and cause the hammer and sicle looks so damn cool.

pepper: I just thought it was Italian cause Stuka sounds kind-of italian :D
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-24 12:55:16 UTC Post #85470
Now everybody has this ---->Proudly Liberal word

''LAME'' :P
And I didnt get are these guys Americans : (saying this honestly :| )
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-24 12:57:48 UTC Post #85471
If you don't understand my av, it's a contradiction of America today (which is actually very right wing).
why?Because they are trying to kill everybody...
:
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-24 13:02:03 UTC Post #85472
hey saco, stupid, if you click on the persons name, it usually tells where they're from. and its funny, but the people you think are the obnoxious americans, are really the right thinking "utopians" who visit this site. hmm...
Posted 19 years ago2005-01-24 13:10:02 UTC Post #85477
hey idiot,I know where he is from but why did he say that then ??
You must be logged in to post a response.