Multi_managers are not necessary Created 18 years ago2006-05-30 06:23:34 UTC by altv

Hi, I want to that multi_managers are not necessary in some cases :).
First if you want to or more things to act together do this: There is only one simple thing just name the things you want to act together with the same name and here you go you have replaced a multi_manager!!!

Sotos from greece :lol:

With a multi_manager, you can set a time delay for each thing to happen. Giving all the entities you want triggered the same names means they're fired all at once and this is not you generally want to happen sometimes.

Ehh... yes it's true but when you don't want time delay you can use it

The whole point of a multi_manager is to organize timed events. Of course it won't be neccessary when you aren't timing anything, thats not what multi_managers are for.

wow what a pointless thread. It's obvious we won't use a multi-manager if it's not needed.

Bit harsh. The guy's only trying to be helpful.

Welcome to the site, altv.

Er.. That's pretty self-explanitory, altv.
Still, the multi_manager could never be replaced!