Anyone here running it?
I am planning to wait until it's out of beta. Vista works fine for me now, and there's little reason for me to change at this time.
Created 15 years ago2009-01-12 19:06:42 UTC by satchmo
ust don't open any MP3s in WMP unless you've installed the patch (Google for "Windows 7 MP3 corruption" and you'll find a link to it somewhere) or it'll corrupt their headers and take a few seconds off the beginning of them.Are you serious?! Intentional on Microsoft's part as some sort of DRM thingie?
It's just a better Vista FOR NOW, and only on the surface.It's just better XP FOR NOW, I'd say .
I don't know ... I can't upgrade to vista .... even though I have 2 GB of ram. I have to buy a new hdd and a new processor ...What CPU/HDD do you have? If you bought/built your system around the time 2GB became mainstream, I see no reason why Vista wouldn't run just fine, though Win7 would run better, but if you don't want to use beta software and be exposed to the risks associated with it, you should probably just stick to XP until Win7 hits release.
Intel Pentium D 3.20 ghz, 2 Gb of corsair twin memory 800 mhz in dual channel , 160 gb hdd , ati radeon hd 4850 and gigabyte s-series p965 rev 3.3 .That will run Vista just fine, CPU is lacking a bit but it's far from inadequate, though personally I'd stick with XP until Win7, which your computer is more than adequate for, is released.
rev 3.3 which is why I want to buy a CO rev of E8400 and stay with it at 3.6-3,8 ghz