(scince TWHL is kinda dead? 
)Have a look at this:
I tested my self with a peice of paper!
8x8 = 13x5
Created 19 years ago2005-12-05 13:28:56 UTC by
Madcow
Created 19 years ago2005-12-05 13:28:56 UTC by
Madcow
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-05 13:28:56 UTC
Post #150529
I know this is old, but still, just wanted to bring it up. (scince TWHL is kinda dead? )
Have a look at this:Maths got pwned.
I tested my self with a peice of paper!
(scince TWHL is kinda dead? )Have a look at this:
I tested my self with a peice of paper!
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-05 13:34:52 UTC
Post #150531
Right.
Coffee??
Coffee??
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-05 13:44:36 UTC
Post #150532
Try it for youself! 
I'm gonna show my science teacher
I'm gonna show my science teacher
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-05 13:50:43 UTC
Post #150534
Actually it's wrong.
The angle of the longer pieces has a tangent of 3/8 (count the squares)
but the tangent of the angle of the other pieces is 2/5.
It means that the angle is 20,55 ? for the longer pieces but the angle for the other ones is 21,80 ?
Meaning that you can't put them together like the picture does. The angle is not the same. The extra space that is left between (if you align them properly) adds up to 1 unit, which is not much but enough to fool you
The angle of the longer pieces has a tangent of 3/8 (count the squares)
but the tangent of the angle of the other pieces is 2/5.
It means that the angle is 20,55 ? for the longer pieces but the angle for the other ones is 21,80 ?
Meaning that you can't put them together like the picture does. The angle is not the same. The extra space that is left between (if you align them properly) adds up to 1 unit, which is not much but enough to fool you
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-05 13:53:31 UTC
Post #150535
I didn't notice,, =/
You're right!
Pwned I guess, lol
You're right!
Pwned I guess, lol
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-05 14:03:30 UTC
Post #150537
Hmmm... Who just took my intrest?
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-05 19:54:37 UTC
Post #150587
I was about to say "uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh" untill Kasperg de-pwned math.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 12:15:26 UTC
Post #150855
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 12:16:35 UTC
Post #150856
go go go nubs find a bug in this :>
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 12:27:27 UTC
Post #150858
Done, again the tangens of both triangles arent the same, somehow the guy whom made this has absolutely no clue how to use math's. Its so frickin simple on calculating the error using the triangle of phythagoras.
Just apply it on the green and the red triangle then using then calculate the tangens on your calculator. it will show you a differance of 0.051237168
I rest my case.
Just apply it on the green and the red triangle then using then calculate the tangens on your calculator. it will show you a differance of 0.051237168
I rest my case.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 12:27:52 UTC
Post #150859
This is now the official "odd maths problem thread"
@Pepper: I don't get it.. :S How did you figgure it out?
@Pepper: I don't get it.. :S How did you figgure it out?
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 12:38:06 UTC
Post #150860
these are no problems
if you look at it carefully it's not even a triangle
if you look at it carefully it's not even a triangle
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 12:42:57 UTC
Post #150862
It isn't? Explain and rise my IQ!
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 12:44:09 UTC
Post #150863
Yup.. You just can't pwn basic maths..
That's a fact.
That's a fact.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 12:45:47 UTC
Post #150865
well if you don't see it just look more carefully at the squares or if that doesn't help get a ruler or something and look at the longest side.(don't know how it's called in english)
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 12:48:15 UTC
Post #150866
it will show you a differance of 0.051237168Radians?
Please, sensible significant figures :P.
I like maths.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 12:59:45 UTC
Post #150876
you can't just pwn mathsYou can!
Ask the theory of relativety, my friend.
I'll give you an example!
We all know that, 300 000 kilometer/second is the speed of light.
And we all know that 300 000 splitted in 2 always equals 150 000.
But the last part is wrong!
It aint always 150 000.
Why?
Well, Einstein gave this example,
You are standing infront of the sun and the light passes you with the speed of 300 000 km/s.
And here's the odd part.
You fly away in half the speed of light (150 000 km/s)
logicaly, the light should now pass you in 150 km/s, but,, it doesn't?
It still passes you with the standard, 300 000 km/s.
1+1 isn't always 2, etc..
Light travelling in vacuume always passes you with the speed of 300 000 km/s.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:01:32 UTC
Post #150879
Light is a completely different matter then calculating angles and sides.
Exactly spag, that is my point, it isnt a triangle .
Exactly spag, that is my point, it isnt a triangle
.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:04:27 UTC
Post #150882
So, anyone has anything else to show us? :>
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:05:16 UTC
Post #150883
light is a completely different matter then calculating angles and sides.But it's still maths
:
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:07:29 UTC
Post #150884
Yeah, but it doesn't mean that (3x10^8 ms^-1)/2 != 1.5x10^8 ms^-1.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:07:30 UTC
Post #150885
To explain it in a simpler way, lets just say that in order to place a triangle after the one that is 5x2 squares, the next triangle would have to keep this proportion (10x4 squares, 20x8 squares etc.) But the red triangle is 8x3 squares. It does not mantain that proportion, so it wouldnt line up with the green one. The drawings are very forced.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:08:12 UTC
Post #150886
I said that you can't pwn basic math. None of that einstein/physics stuff
8 x 8 is basic in my record.
8 x 8 is basic in my record.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:10:45 UTC
Post #150888
@7th: wtf?
@kasperg: Just noticed right before you posted..
They do not look the same at all, in size
@kasperg: Just noticed right before you posted..
They do not look the same at all, in size
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:13:29 UTC
Post #150889
TWHL's forums need equation markup!
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:16:42 UTC
Post #150891
I failed maths but what I see above is not basic :
That is extreme! I swear it! Algebra is advanced to me!
Here is a good maths problem:
2x2=?
That is extreme! I swear it! Algebra is advanced to me!
Here is a good maths problem:
2x2=?
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:20:57 UTC
Post #150892
@7th: To the TWHL3 mobile!
@Habboi: awww...
@Habboi: awww...
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:30:14 UTC
Post #150895
habbeh:
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 13:32:07 UTC
Post #150897
lol
Pwned.
Anyone else got one of these things who tries to pwn maths?
Pwned.
Anyone else got one of these things who tries to pwn maths?
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 15:22:21 UTC
Post #150923
mmm physics :>
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 17:26:12 UTC
Post #150948
There, finally showed you some of my Maths, SpaG :).
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 17:28:09 UTC
Post #150950
@7th: What stands mh and f for? I do not recognize them. The rest seems alright in the graph.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 17:28:27 UTC
Post #150951
we do such things on physics lessons too
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 17:30:23 UTC
Post #150953
H = henries, F = farads. Units of inductance and capacitance, respectively.
Graph?
Graph?
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 17:33:57 UTC
Post #150954
U'm sorry for that. I meant formula.
Clear to me now .
Clear to me now
.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 17:35:43 UTC
Post #150956
1 + 1 = 3
Statistics department. It's true for large values of 1.
Statistics department. It's true for large values of 1.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 17:48:59 UTC
Post #150960
Anyone for Sudoko?
Its a Japanese number game, look at the site for rules, and some tips on how to Sudoko!!1!
Its a Japanese number game, look at the site for rules, and some tips on how to Sudoko!!1!
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 17:52:12 UTC
Post #150963
Anyone for a sudoku solving program? I didn't take the time to add backtracking to it but apart from that, it can solve most medium sudoku puzzles in it's current shape.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-07 17:57:28 UTC
Post #150964
I hate sudoko...
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-08 01:03:27 UTC
Post #151008
1 + 1 = fun on a bun "ed edd and eddy = great show" weird cause i saw some kid doing a sudoko book at school 2 days ago and now i no wat it is... im more of a fan of drawing myself inflicting pain upon noobs but others enjoy sudoko
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-08 11:25:46 UTC
Post #151093
Suduko is teh pwn!
There always follows a suduko game in the news paper, it gets harder for every day.
Monday: easy
Sunday: Hardest
I usually slove the one at saturday.
There always follows a suduko game in the news paper, it gets harder for every day.
Monday: easy
Sunday: Hardest
I usually slove the one at saturday.
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-08 11:34:22 UTC
Post #151095
I showed my teacher, but, I told him the shape was forced.
Does noone else got some odd math problem or,, "how can that be" thingy?
Does noone else got some odd math problem or,, "how can that be" thingy?
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-08 11:58:00 UTC
Post #151096
Anyone for Sudoko?Sudoko pwns. It's one of my favorite
Its a Japanese number game, look at the site for rules, and some tips on how to Sudoko!!1!
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-08 12:53:36 UTC
Post #151102
sudoko is for g33ks that dont have a l1f3
Posted 19 years ago2005-12-08 12:57:36 UTC
Post #151103
thanks a lot :
You must be logged in to post a response.