Forum posts
That's amazing!
So, did you try to use trigger_push? Because it should work.
And if you did - how did you set it up?
Remeber that you have to turn it on (because default is off) - you need to give it a force and you need to give it a direction to push
And if you did - how did you set it up?
Remeber that you have to turn it on (because default is off) - you need to give it a force and you need to give it a direction to push
What are you on about?
Could you be more specific if you have a problem please
Could you be more specific if you have a problem please
Conveyer, Conveyor belt? What's a converer?
And whatever it is - how did you make it?
If you want to move a prop_physics you should use a trigger_push
And whatever it is - how did you make it?
If you want to move a prop_physics you should use a trigger_push
String theory ftw
It happens all the time for all source mappers (?).
Fix it by selecting the camera tool in the tools menu to the left where all the other tools are (vertex, brush etc...) and create a camera in one of the 2D views (Press and drag), and then it works.
Edit: oh - it was already sloved, I missed that
Fix it by selecting the camera tool in the tools menu to the left where all the other tools are (vertex, brush etc...) and create a camera in one of the 2D views (Press and drag), and then it works.
Edit: oh - it was already sloved, I missed that
[IMO]
I agree with the hunter.
Really, a PC is cheaper in the long run - and - the graphics pwns and the material on a PC is editable.
There are so many good things with PCs, consoles doesn't even get close
I agree with the hunter.
Really, a PC is cheaper in the long run - and - the graphics pwns and the material on a PC is editable.
There are so many good things with PCs, consoles doesn't even get close
I don't see what's wrong with the idea, I like it.
Sure - it would probably require a monster-computer, but it would be hot!
A totally realistic envoriment + it's a game so you can do whatever you want.
Sure - it would probably require a monster-computer, but it would be hot!
A totally realistic envoriment + it's a game so you can do whatever you want.
Tosse: Yeah you missed a bit, I was wrong about that part, I agree on that.
But I still don't agree with this conspirasy thing.
Jahzel: Don't mess with the word infinite, really
But I still don't agree with this conspirasy thing.
Actually, most extraterrestrials have been reported to have no external organs...Reported?
Jahzel: Don't mess with the word infinite, really
Did you select the face with the blend texture before creating the displacement?
If you want to make displacement out of just one side, you select that side, and no other.
You probably selected the nodraw-sides aswell.
To select a single face you simply select the texture-applying tool and click on the face wich you want to select, and then create the displacement.
To select more than one face, press and hold CTRL.
If you want to make displacement out of just one side, you select that side, and no other.
You probably selected the nodraw-sides aswell.
To select a single face you simply select the texture-applying tool and click on the face wich you want to select, and then create the displacement.
To select more than one face, press and hold CTRL.
I think it would be a great way to force the players to co-operate.
If you don't, you'll loose.
If you don't, you'll loose.
I guess you're right, you've convinced me
Worldcraft dude:
I'm not saying that you are wrong, this is just my opinion.
A bacteria is a bacteria, it's small and doesn't react on things like a bigger creature does.
For example, we have internal organs.
What I'm saying is that I find it quite unlikley that something big could survive in as harsh condition as something small.
And no, I'm not a bigologist so I'm just stating what I think seems reasonable.
But what the scientists has observed when "dirty water" and sun-light was combined was pretty convinsing.
What the combination seemed to create was some kind of a cell.
But perhaps other alien lifeforms aren't cell based?
Who knows?
I'm not saying that you are wrong, this is just my opinion.
A bacteria is a bacteria, it's small and doesn't react on things like a bigger creature does.
For example, we have internal organs.
What I'm saying is that I find it quite unlikley that something big could survive in as harsh condition as something small.
And no, I'm not a bigologist so I'm just stating what I think seems reasonable.
Water might not even be a factor, period.As said earlier in the thread, of course there could be lifeforms based on other elements.
But what the scientists has observed when "dirty water" and sun-light was combined was pretty convinsing.
What the combination seemed to create was some kind of a cell.
But perhaps other alien lifeforms aren't cell based?
Who knows?
Oh yeah - forgot that.
Now when you brought it up I remember that they've even found life in boiling water, weird.
But there must be a limit, too cold or too hot.
I mean, a planet too close to the sun, or too far away should probably not be able to have any life, perhaps bacteria, but no big lifeforms
Now when you brought it up I remember that they've even found life in boiling water, weird.
But there must be a limit, too cold or too hot.
I mean, a planet too close to the sun, or too far away should probably not be able to have any life, perhaps bacteria, but no big lifeforms
I don't see how we can make claims like that if we have only ever seen life on Earth,Of course you're right about that.
Of course we (and all Earth creatures) have evolved by depending on water, probablly because the Earth is 70-80% water
So we should not make assumptions about the universe based on what we see here.
It's just a theory.
But still, a life form could probably not live in too cold enviroments, or too hot enviroments.
Therefore there is something called a "life-zone" around every sun, if there is a planet orbiting inside this life-zone it's likley to have life.
The reason we think water is the root of life is because the sun was once much hotter than it is today, and there was water on Mars.
By then, Mars had life wich we have found in the form of fossils under the surface.
When the water freezed and Mars went all cool the life died.
However there still might be life on Mars far under the surface where there might be small underground water-channels
As far as I know, Mars doesn't have any heavy elements on it's surface, and therefore there is no radioactivity.
The radiation you're talking about is the one coming from the sun because Mars doesn't have any great protection against that.
The storms are just dust particles flying around.
Also, as far as I know, no mars-expedition has gone wrong because of storms on the surface/radiation.
Or am I wrong?
The radiation you're talking about is the one coming from the sun because Mars doesn't have any great protection against that.
The storms are just dust particles flying around.
Also, as far as I know, no mars-expedition has gone wrong because of storms on the surface/radiation.
Or am I wrong?
Remember that life can only be created in certain enviroments.
Water is needed (at least we think so) and should therefore not be too cold or too hot.
They say that the cells themself was created out of "dirty" water and sunshine.
If you put dirty water under the sun you will notice how the molecules starts to create "cell-lookalike shapes".
Just something that I've heard of...
Water is needed (at least we think so) and should therefore not be too cold or too hot.
They say that the cells themself was created out of "dirty" water and sunshine.
If you put dirty water under the sun you will notice how the molecules starts to create "cell-lookalike shapes".
Just something that I've heard of...
Check func_physbox_multiplayer's flags, and check if "don't take physical damage" is checked (I'm not even sure if that flag excists, but usualy physical entities has it.
If you want to destroy every asteroid after exactly 10 seconds you could probably you a logic_timer and just kill it.
An other way to do it is that you could parant (or just put it in the place where the asteroids lands) an env_explosion and some smoke to the asteroid wich is activated after 10 seconds, the explosion would surley destroy the asteroid, and the smoke would make it look sexy
If you want to destroy every asteroid after exactly 10 seconds you could probably you a logic_timer and just kill it.
An other way to do it is that you could parant (or just put it in the place where the asteroids lands) an env_explosion and some smoke to the asteroid wich is activated after 10 seconds, the explosion would surley destroy the asteroid, and the smoke would make it look sexy
No, I believe they are all proveable.
Big bang is a theory, because it does not go against anything confirmed, matter can be created out of nothing.
I can't just guess the age of earth, that would be unscientific.
But I could try to calculate it, wich would be scientific.
Evolution is a theory, and idea, does not need to be proveable.
A theory doesn't need to be proveable to be a theory
There is nothing to it wich goes against anything else we know (I'm not great at biology but at least I think so)
Big bang is a theory, because it does not go against anything confirmed, matter can be created out of nothing.
I can't just guess the age of earth, that would be unscientific.
But I could try to calculate it, wich would be scientific.
Evolution is a theory, and idea, does not need to be proveable.
A theory doesn't need to be proveable to be a theory
There is nothing to it wich goes against anything else we know (I'm not great at biology but at least I think so)
And how do you confirm theories?Of course you can prove a theory.
"Science" is only things that can be absolutely proven and confirmed?
For example, Einsteins theory about spacetime being bended around massive bodys was confirmed by shooting a beam of light and see how it also was bended (or by looking at lightsources behind the sun)
A scientific model however, is something wich CAN be proven or confirmed, for example, "Outside the universe there are nothing but bananas", it can't be proven or confirmed and therefore it's not a scientific-model.
yeah, a 3rd of the world is definately most of us...Ok maybe not - but you get the point.
If we're actually doing some aliens dirty work on this planet without noticing it, then why bother?
It's like earning money while playing a game you like.
lol definelol, no.
Men in white coats?
"Actuall-science" should be based on theories/ideas that has been confirmed.
If something you say works against a theory or an idea that has been confirmed it's no longer science, just fantazy (except the conflict between quantum-mechanics and the theory of relativity, but that's a whole other thing so don't bring that up)
Also, if these aliens and all that is a big coverup and they are doing everything in secret, then they would kill us for writing what we are writing here, right? I mean, we know their secret!
People live happy lifes, so who cares if we are slaves or not (I bet not), we're still living good lifes, except some but.. most of us
Ok so you're saying that what you are suggesting is based on actuall-science?
I'm with pepper.
Most of what you're saying is pure movie-crap, and does not excist for real.
I refuse to believe in a conspiracy theory if it isn't based on real science.
Most of what you're saying is pure movie-crap, and does not excist for real.
I refuse to believe in a conspiracy theory if it isn't based on real science.
I do believe in aliens, as Sari said
No way.
The closest star is Alpha Centauri, wich is 2 lightyears away from here.
"Oh but it only takes 2 years to travell then?"
Yes, if you can travel in the speed of light, a technology like that is possible, but not likely.
According to Einstein you can't travel faster than the speed of light, so getting to earth in less than 2 years time is in theory impossible
Also, 2 years is quite a long time.
I don't think they would travell for 2 years to get to our planet if they do not know if there is life here (we've not recived any radio-contact from alpha centauri and if there is life on alpha centauri they do not have radio-tech so they would not know that we are here)
Edit: Oh, there is of course a small possibility of so called "Wormholes", using those they could be able to travel to our solar-system, but scientists has not confirmed wormholes yet.
Also, keep in mind that they must know that we're here before making the trip, if they do not know that we're here then I don't think they would do the trip just for fun.
The universe is so friggin' gigantic that there has to be at least one other planet with intelligent life.But have they ever visited us?
No way.
The closest star is Alpha Centauri, wich is 2 lightyears away from here.
"Oh but it only takes 2 years to travell then?"
Yes, if you can travel in the speed of light, a technology like that is possible, but not likely.
According to Einstein you can't travel faster than the speed of light, so getting to earth in less than 2 years time is in theory impossible
Also, 2 years is quite a long time.
I don't think they would travell for 2 years to get to our planet if they do not know if there is life here (we've not recived any radio-contact from alpha centauri and if there is life on alpha centauri they do not have radio-tech so they would not know that we are here)
Edit: Oh, there is of course a small possibility of so called "Wormholes", using those they could be able to travel to our solar-system, but scientists has not confirmed wormholes yet.
Also, keep in mind that they must know that we're here before making the trip, if they do not know that we're here then I don't think they would do the trip just for fun.
Lol, great stuff Daubster, that's all I have to say.
You make a func_tank (I don't think the name was just "func_tank". but something similar) and then you make a trigger_multiple (and an info_target on the ground if you want NPC's to control it), the func_tank is.. the tank and the trigger_multiple will work as the control volume.
Inside the func_tank properties there is a way to select the controlvolume, select the trigger_multiple.
Of course there are many other things wich needs to be setup but to make a controlable func_tank you use control volumes
I don't recall how it's made exactly but when I return to my real computer I'll have a look because I have a map with a mounted gun
Inside the func_tank properties there is a way to select the controlvolume, select the trigger_multiple.
Of course there are many other things wich needs to be setup but to make a controlable func_tank you use control volumes
I don't recall how it's made exactly but when I return to my real computer I'll have a look because I have a map with a mounted gun
I like slasher's idea combined with what pepper said.
I haven't downloaded the map habboi linked too yet though, I'm not on the computer on wich I have Steam etc..
The hunter's and habboi's ideas seems good and easy too, but they both has the 360 problem, and you can probably still duck and all that.
I've heard that if you put the player inside a solid, the player will either be teleported out or start shaking like mad.
I'll try to try all of your suggestions and report the results.
Thanks for your help
I haven't downloaded the map habboi linked too yet though, I'm not on the computer on wich I have Steam etc..
The hunter's and habboi's ideas seems good and easy too, but they both has the 360 problem, and you can probably still duck and all that.
I've heard that if you put the player inside a solid, the player will either be teleported out or start shaking like mad.
I'll try to try all of your suggestions and report the results.
Thanks for your help
If you would have read the other posts you would've known that the player would then be able to turn around 360, duck, jump(even though the ceiling is low enough) and walk, he wouldn't come anywhere by doing these stuff, but we don't want the player to be avable to do these things.
I heard of the mod but I never downloaded it.
But when I looked on the site it looked like quite a cool mod so I downloaded it, but there were no servers.
But when I looked on the site it looked like quite a cool mod so I downloaded it, but there were no servers.
Yeah, either that habboi, or an entity wich gives you a view (like point_viewcontrol) though it should be controlable.
Could you please have a look on how you did it?
Could you please have a look on how you did it?
ASP rocks, but PHP is even better.
Never tried CGI
Never tried CGI
Setang doesn't restrict the views, I tried it.
It just changed the view to whatever <pitch> <yaw> <roll> you entered.
But even if it would have restricted the views we couldn't have used it because the player would still have been enabled to jump and duck inside this invisible box.
Or have I missundertod your proposition?
It just changed the view to whatever <pitch> <yaw> <roll> you entered.
But even if it would have restricted the views we couldn't have used it because the player would still have been enabled to jump and duck inside this invisible box.
Or have I missundertod your proposition?
Congratulations
bump
I think you can do this using the same entity wich you use when you make brushbased vehicles.
There should be some kind of an entity wich makes a controlable view wich can be activated through an output
I think you can do this using the same entity wich you use when you make brushbased vehicles.
There should be some kind of an entity wich makes a controlable view wich can be activated through an output
I was gonna suggest random enviroment but that's what noice is right?
Yeah, it works now!
Sweet
Sweet
Oh, well that's because I use the swedish version of windows, we use commas instrad of decimal places
1. Yes, Swedish
2. Yes, I have QWERT keyboard, but I've no idea if I've got "the regular ASCII set"
3. Yes.
4. http://www.twhl.co.za/mapvault_map.php?id=4358
Tell me when you've downloaded it so I can remove it from ze Vault
2. Yes, I have QWERT keyboard, but I've no idea if I've got "the regular ASCII set"
3. Yes.
4. http://www.twhl.co.za/mapvault_map.php?id=4358
Tell me when you've downloaded it so I can remove it from ze Vault
Well I didn't save the values I used, but I'll try the new version, and if the same thing happens now I will report with a bit more detail
Edit:
I get this:
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6097/problem01eo9.jpg
(The image is from hammer, not preview)
With these values:
Width: 256
Length: 512
Radius: 256
Angle: 90
Power: 4
Edit:
I get this:
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6097/problem01eo9.jpg
(The image is from hammer, not preview)
With these values:
Width: 256
Length: 512
Radius: 256
Angle: 90
Power: 4
It doesn't work at all for me, all I get is displacement-applied squares
Wow, shit.
I love that curve penguin, perfect
I love that curve penguin, perfect
But the player would still be able to move around, right?
I need an entity which I can use instead of the player view (like a point_viewcontrol) but I want it to be controlable
I need an entity which I can use instead of the player view (like a point_viewcontrol) but I want it to be controlable
I am making a scene where you sit inside a chopper as a passenger and I don't want the player to move around inside the chopper, but I want him to be able to look around from the spot he sits on.
Point_viewcontrol won't work in this case as you can't control it.
But I've heard that an other entity can do it, but I'm not sure wich one, so if you know anything about how to pull this off please tell me about it.
Thanks!
Point_viewcontrol won't work in this case as you can't control it.
But I've heard that an other entity can do it, but I'm not sure wich one, so if you know anything about how to pull this off please tell me about it.
Thanks!
What about complex entity-setups?
I think you download spirit and use it as a template for your mod.
Just doubble click the brush/entity or other thing
Found something: http://www.twhl.co.za/mapvault_map.php?id=2086
It can only be opened from one side, and the glass can't be transparant.
Example map by Trapt
It can only be opened from one side, and the glass can't be transparant.
Example map by Trapt
I've heard that it is possible - never done it myself though
Perhaps this will help: Adding glass to doors
I don't think making breakable glass is mentioned it the tutorial, but maybe you can figgure it out after reading it.
I don't think making breakable glass is mentioned it the tutorial, but maybe you can figgure it out after reading it.