Dunno what that has to do with TWHL3, but ok.
It's being coded from the ground up, remember.
TWHL3
Created 18 years ago2006-04-05 17:18:16 UTC by
Seventh-Monkey
Created 18 years ago2006-04-05 17:18:16 UTC by
Seventh-Monkey
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-05 09:10:48 UTC
Post #224479
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-05 09:51:27 UTC
Post #224480
The swearfilter is just a plane bad idea! If you just flamed someone and you feel darn proud too, then the guy you flamed doesn't know just what the fuck you said beacause all he could se was:
'** ** * **** * **** * * *** *** *** ** * * ** ***'
@ZL: You ingonrant little boy, what is your damage?
You obviously never really learned how you make a good site or how you optimize a 'kinda' good site. If you know how to use frames it can be pretty damn awesome, but you obviously don't. So I suggest that you go ahead and learn some basics instead of talking about your own faliures.
Sure, it would suck if you had 100 frames with different sources (like you probably did?), or even 5, but that's not the case here you bozo! Im talking about two fucking frames! One for the menubar and one for the site. And that would rock. So up yours ZL, you angry little boy!
'** ** * **** * **** * * *** *** *** ** * * ** ***'
@ZL: You ingonrant little boy, what is your damage?
You obviously never really learned how you make a good site or how you optimize a 'kinda' good site. If you know how to use frames it can be pretty damn awesome, but you obviously don't. So I suggest that you go ahead and learn some basics instead of talking about your own faliures.
Sure, it would suck if you had 100 frames with different sources (like you probably did?), or even 5, but that's not the case here you bozo! Im talking about two fucking frames! One for the menubar and one for the site. And that would rock. So up yours ZL, you angry little boy!
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-05 09:53:59 UTC
Post #224481
Personally I think CSS layers are better. Not that I know much about web design. 
And I just thought I'd save making a new thread Mr Anthony.
And I just thought I'd save making a new thread Mr Anthony.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-05 12:52:39 UTC
Post #224501
Tosse, until I see you come up with something like this, I'm going to respect Loffe's opinion on web design more than yours.
Frames suck, end of discussion.
Frames suck, end of discussion.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-05 16:53:53 UTC
Post #224520
God, Tosse, you really need to pick up on web standards, and you know, doing websites like they weren't done in 1996. Frames are bad - deal with it. Ask the W3C or the Web Standards Project or generally people who know how to make websites. If you're still not convinced, have a look in #css or #html on freenode. Those guys are pretty much all paid web designers, who actually keep up with web design, unlike you.
Srsly, gb2 table layouts ffs.
Tosse, until I see you come up with something like this, I'm going to respect Loffe's opinion on web design more than yours.I would say "ZING", but that wouldn't be very classy of me.
Srsly, gb2 table layouts ffs.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-05 19:02:49 UTC
Post #224529
Tosse thinks because he's in a web design class he knows everything.
LAFF
LAFF
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-07 12:50:35 UTC
Post #224673
Tosse, until I see you come up with something like this, I'm going to respect Loffe's opinion on web design more than yours....Well that was just one of the ugliest pice of crap I've ever seen. If you're gonna 'show off' you gonna need something remotly goodlooking...
mumble mumbdle...Damn retards... mumble mumble
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-07 13:09:15 UTC
Post #224674
oh noes!! you know what this calls for? C-C-CAGE MATCH!
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-13 08:16:08 UTC
Post #225070
i know what it calls for! Clicky!
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-15 06:04:28 UTC
Post #225285
Dude, seriously. Frames are shit. They serve no logical purpose.
Now, Elof and I regularly converse on website design as well as standards and whatnot, so we're fairly well versed. We also have designs to show: I have my own site and the design of the New Classic theme for TWHL3, and Elof has a bunch more (and is far more talented than I am). To my knowledge (and according to your profile), you have none.
The swear filter is going in. It'll be off by default. End of story.
Now, Elof and I regularly converse on website design as well as standards and whatnot, so we're fairly well versed. We also have designs to show: I have my own site and the design of the New Classic theme for TWHL3, and Elof has a bunch more (and is far more talented than I am). To my knowledge (and according to your profile), you have none.
The swear filter is going in. It'll be off by default. End of story.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-17 23:52:31 UTC
Post #225526
God, I know enough about web design to say frames should be avoided, and I think ZL's web portfolio is proof enough that he knows what he's talking about.
And what's wrong with the swear filter? It does no harm as it's off by default. Good work TWHL3 peeps. Bad Tosse, bad.
And what's wrong with the swear filter? It does no harm as it's off by default. Good work TWHL3 peeps. Bad Tosse, bad.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-18 00:00:36 UTC
Post #225527
Is it just me, or does Tosse sound drunk in both of those posts (especially the first one)?
Anyway, I'm not sure I would be too proud about using that many swear words in a row, but if the coders have any sense at all it'll be like "f***" instead of "****".
Anyway, I'm not sure I would be too proud about using that many swear words in a row, but if the coders have any sense at all it'll be like "f***" instead of "****".
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-20 01:55:06 UTC
Post #225760
Alright, I have another idea, and I think everybody will like this one.
When deleting private messages, instead of having that utterly useless page with an "OK" button on it, I'd like a page to confirm the deletion with "YES" and "NO" buttons. I feel what's there right now is pretty much pointless, but it could be put to some use.
When deleting private messages, instead of having that utterly useless page with an "OK" button on it, I'd like a page to confirm the deletion with "YES" and "NO" buttons. I feel what's there right now is pretty much pointless, but it could be put to some use.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-20 02:06:52 UTC
Post #225762
Better yet, you could just tick all the ones you don't want then the delete them all in one click.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-20 02:17:51 UTC
Post #225765
Better yet, you could just tick all the ones you don't want then the delete them all in two clicks.Fixed.
Has anyone mentioned we need an edit button for Map Vault comments?Constantly! When Rowleybob was here, it's all he ever complained about!
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-20 02:28:33 UTC
Post #225766
One click > Two clicks
And don't question my maths.
And don't question my maths.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-20 02:40:13 UTC
Post #225767
/me questions them
We need a delete confirmation page, end of story.
We need a delete confirmation page, end of story.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-20 03:14:42 UTC
Post #225768
bUt 1 Cl1k iZ f4st3R.
Confirmation page makes sense though, you win.
I think one of the biggest additions TWHL3 needs is the ability to sort the map vault by game/mod of your choice (e.g. HL2DM only), and not just by TWHL's current mod sorting method (top to bottom). Not sure if that's on the cards or not.
Confirmation page makes sense though, you win.
I think one of the biggest additions TWHL3 needs is the ability to sort the map vault by game/mod of your choice (e.g. HL2DM only), and not just by TWHL's current mod sorting method (top to bottom). Not sure if that's on the cards or not.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-20 04:53:10 UTC
Post #225776
Oh, definately.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-20 05:05:22 UTC
Post #225777
thats easy shiz ^_^
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-20 17:25:32 UTC
Post #225868
Absolutely no doubt.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-20 20:29:44 UTC
Post #225918
Nice. 
...Imagine that's a thumbs up instead.
...Imagine that's a thumbs up instead.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-21 05:55:45 UTC
Post #225939
How rude.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-23 04:04:01 UTC
Post #226234
check out the new updates if you haven't already. Click the Logo!
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-23 04:21:42 UTC
Post #226235
foiled by tinyurl preview.
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-23 04:27:02 UTC
Post #226236
i did see a preview tho. i dunno if i can say anything or not. :
Posted 17 years ago2007-06-23 05:05:03 UTC
Post #226237
well if you go to my profile and click my website link you'll see my twhl3 concept with php
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-02 05:50:42 UTC
Post #227123
Ok, New Classic got a bit of a GUI update today:
http://www.rabid-monkey.com/~ant/twhl/twhl3/
I tidied up a fair bit of the style code, and added some extra bits. The front page is nearly done, design wise.
http://www.rabid-monkey.com/~ant/twhl/twhl3/
I tidied up a fair bit of the style code, and added some extra bits. The front page is nearly done, design wise.
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-02 18:14:45 UTC
Post #227205
Change the <div class="headers"></div> to <h4></h4>. Much more semantic. Should be easy replace work, both in the HTML and CSS.
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-02 21:57:25 UTC
Post #227226
Will do. That is your code anyway. 
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-03 12:12:16 UTC
Post #227248
Hey i just thought of something.
I dont know if it's been mentioned or not, but you know how if you click on the thread with the most recent post, it brings you straight to the last page?
Why can't every thread you click on bring you to the last page?
(gettin tired of clicking 4 or 5 times to read HL:HS)
I dont know if it's been mentioned or not, but you know how if you click on the thread with the most recent post, it brings you straight to the last page?
Why can't every thread you click on bring you to the last page?
(gettin tired of clicking 4 or 5 times to read HL:HS)
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-03 12:21:33 UTC
Post #227250
There's already a button for that.
After the name of the last poster, there's a little arrow pointing right you can click.
After the name of the last poster, there's a little arrow pointing right you can click.
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-03 13:08:12 UTC
Post #227252
thats crap i never payed attention to that frekin arrow
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 05:26:53 UTC
Post #228050
When TWHL3 comes, i think we need some better forum rules......
I must admit, i have been on plenty of sites where they dont have forum modderators etc and they can still keep the peace without insults, swearing etc.
TWHL has heaps of modderators, but they do little to stop those who cause trouble.
I must admit, i have been on plenty of sites where they dont have forum modderators etc and they can still keep the peace without insults, swearing etc.
TWHL has heaps of modderators, but they do little to stop those who cause trouble.
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 05:32:24 UTC
Post #228052
Swearing will always be allowed, as we already discussed. That's why there's going to be a swear filter if you don't like it.
As for insults... well, every forum has them, and I personally don't see the problem with it. It unavoidable when you're discussing things that people are highly opinionated about. I wouldn't exactly call it trouble.
As for insults... well, every forum has them, and I personally don't see the problem with it. It unavoidable when you're discussing things that people are highly opinionated about. I wouldn't exactly call it trouble.
There's already a button for that.I don't see it... I mean, there's these little arrow symbol things on either side of the page numbers that seem like they should do something, but they're unclickable.
After the name of the last poster, there's a little arrow pointing right you can click.
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 05:53:19 UTC
Post #228053
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 06:28:27 UTC
Post #228054
Oh. Wow, that's a tiny arrow you've got there. D:
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 06:38:53 UTC
Post #228055
it is rather small, isn't it?
anyway, i was thinking the forum topics should be expanded.
we already have
-HL1 discussion
-Source
-maps and mods
-site suggestions
-general
...but we need a few more like:
-tech
-modelling
-a forum for all those 'deep, religious, stupid conspiracy' threads, etc
any more?
anyway, i was thinking the forum topics should be expanded.
we already have
-HL1 discussion
-Source
-maps and mods
-site suggestions
-general
...but we need a few more like:
-tech
-modelling
-a forum for all those 'deep, religious, stupid conspiracy' threads, etc
any more?
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 06:57:08 UTC
Post #228056
I don't think modeling is a necessary section, as most people here don't do it, or at least don't discuss it. I personally think modeling discussion should just stay in the forum of whatever engine it's for. I wouldn't have any problem if a section for it existed, but I think it may end up being kinda empty.
I also think having a whole forum dedicated to annoying political/religious/conspiracy threads kind of suggest that we want them in the first place, and encourages their existence. This is a mapping site, after all.
But yeah, I definitely think we need a section for technology.
I also think having a whole forum dedicated to annoying political/religious/conspiracy threads kind of suggest that we want them in the first place, and encourages their existence. This is a mapping site, after all.
But yeah, I definitely think we need a section for technology.
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 11:09:35 UTC
Post #228094
People don't talk about tech and have religious crap to have their own forums.
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 11:17:39 UTC
Post #228096
There aren't enough threads concerning tech or religion for them to have their own topic. Everything seems to fit nicely into the 5 we have now, so why change it?
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 14:48:08 UTC
Post #228129
make the last page arrow bigger
or change it to
"last page"
or change it to
"last page"
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 20:04:55 UTC
Post #228153
i still think there should be something done about "insults" etc, becasue, its just not funny when someone insults you for no apparent reason, at the very least, we should have a "No Put Down Zone" picture on the front page 
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 20:08:11 UTC
Post #228154
No. Grow up and harden up. This isn't an internet etiquette website for preschoolers. Seriously.
And when was the last time you couldn't tell why you were being insulted? If you are, there's usually an apparent reason for it.
And when was the last time you couldn't tell why you were being insulted? If you are, there's usually an apparent reason for it.
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 23:09:09 UTC
Post #228167
srry: I have the RIGHT to talk/ask about topics on the forums, without being insulted.
and if you find it funny to put in insulting comments (ie: My ABC HL thread: E enough of this stupic thread) then you can just piss off and go bother some one else, because im just sick of it.
and if you find it funny to put in insulting comments (ie: My ABC HL thread: E enough of this stupic thread) then you can just piss off and go bother some one else, because im just sick of it.
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 23:21:17 UTC
Post #228170
It's not a right, it's a privilege. This is the internet.
And when did I ever say I was trying to be funny?
And when did I ever say I was trying to be funny?
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-09 23:28:29 UTC
Post #228172
if you were not trying to be funny WHY DID YOU SAY IT? WHY?
"If you dont have anything good to say dont say anything"
"If you dont have anything good to say dont say anything"
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-10 00:41:04 UTC
Post #228185
"If you dont have anything good to say dont say anything""Good" is often relative, srry probably thinks that thread is a spammy load of crap. So saying it should be ended is "good" from his point of view.
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-10 01:09:40 UTC
Post #228187
Gunter is correct.
if you were not trying to be funny WHY DID YOU SAY IT? WHY?Are you trying to tell me that everything I say should be intended as humorous? Geez.
Posted 17 years ago2007-07-10 01:11:59 UTC
Post #228188
I think NineTnine asked that because he didn't realize that you thought the thread was a spammy load of crap(?)
You must be logged in to post a response.