Created 19 years ago2005-01-30 20:40:03 UTC by Unknown Genius
No one in my country claimed responsability for the train bombings. It was made by terrorist groups from MoroccoDoes Morocco's government openly sponsor terrorism and deny its citizens (especially women) any rights or protection like the Taliban of Afganistan did? Did Morocco's military invade it's neighbors and threaten to do it again and murder and torture countless of its own people like Irac did? Does Morocco execute citizens for speaking out against the government which took away their freedom and gave them no rights like Irac and Afganistans rulers did? Nuff said. Try to make legitimate compairisons in the future, k?
There are countries that would take much less resources to free than Iraq or Afghanistan. You just proved me right by saying the US choses the targets that will give them advantage, which was my point, thanksTell me which countries would take much less resources to free. It's easy just to spout off about something like you know it, but it's much more difficult to back it up.
Those are not my ancestorsAre you a Spanish citizen? If so, you Spanish murdered, tortured, and enslaved millions of Indians in both South and North America. Try reading a non-Spanish account of what you people did to the Indians, you will find that you "mixed" with a very tiny proportion compared to those you exterminated.
you havent made a comment about the Indian situation in North America so I understand you accept the factsThe last time I checked, Mexico, where your Cortez invaded and exterminated many millions of people, is in North America. Didn't you know? And yes, many other European countries also came over and murdered Indians and started wars with them. But everything I've read on the subject shows Spain to be the worst offender, by far.
If Spain hadnt been in Mexico, today it would probably be just another part of the US where indians would have been again exterminated and the rest put in reserves.Are you seriously comparing the sensless murder of many many millions of people just for gold, to putting Indians on a reservation? By the time the US was even a country, you people had brought the indians to the verge of extinction, raped thousands of their women (but didn't claim the children), and enraged the few Indians that were left. How was the US supposed to deal with them?
Quote:How is me saying what I think after reading numerous sources on the subject a contradiction? And you missed the whole point anyway. I brought up the Spanish murder of millions of Indians after you said that the US had killed 15,000 Iraqi civilians (1. Where do you get your numbers 2. All the insurgents are civilians, so what's your point?). I was just reminding you that when you killed all those many millions, no one was going to have freedom afterwards and you were killing them intentionally. So my point was basicly, don't act all high and mighty pointing your finger at America, when your country did much more horrible things than what the US is doing in Irac. Use some perspective.
I personally do not believe anything until I've seen indesputable proof concerning it, not just speculation
Yes... like all those numbers of dead indians 5 century's ago... it's probably indisputable proof, TV stations probably were keeping record of deaths and stuff Stop contradicting yourself.
No one asked for a "freedom force"And no one asked you to butt in to a problem between the US and Irac. Why are some of you acting like the world police against the US? Seems kind of ironic, with your "stay out of conflicts" attitude that you should be so vocal against the US. If you think that whatever happens whithin a countries borders is none of your business, thats fine. If you want to sit back in your warm comfortable house and watch tv while millions of people are starving and being tortured and abused, that's up to you too. But other people might like to try to take care of problems before the broblem ends up on their doorstep.
the Bush administration has also fed the fire of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict these last two yearsOh, and what has the perfect government of Spain done to solve the crisis in Palestine?
Maybe they hide these type of FACTS in your news, and just talk about how happy iraquis are to have daily terrorist bombingsI guess your propiganda over there is all true and the propiganda over here is all false. What do you know of "my news"? What I mostly see in the news concerning Irac is when US and UK soldiers die, when terrorists kill Iraqis, when civilians are kidnapped and or murdered, when US soldiers behave badly and abuse prisoners, and sometimes when innocents are killed by the US or UK.
Now I want to hear your oppinion, U. Genius. I'm actually learning some facts I didnt knowSeems like it.
Comparing the Lochness monster and Bigfoot to something of such magnitude is deeply isulting. How dare you rubbish off the facts, evidence and unaswered questions concerning Bush's 9/11 agenda.I believe there are many unanswered questions concerning 9/11, but speculation is far from being factual imo. And if you think about it, 4 years is faster than a blink of an eye when you think in terms of history. And since Bush can't be President ever again after 2008, it seems bizaar that he would or could mastermind a plan to fake attacks and kill Americans, just so he could be president for 4 more years. I mean, couldn't he just try to get re-elected more traditional ways. Why go to such an extreem?
It only takes minutes to get the jet fighters in the air to escort hijacked planes. The amount of time since they knew about the detour until the planes hit the buildings was more than enough to get the jets on the air, like the emergency procedure dictates.Hmm, are you relying on the official government estimation of how long it takes to get fighters in the air, and of what the emergency procedures are in such cases? Strange that A. You would know that, and B. You would believe any official government reports. Go figure.
There are so many undisputable facts other than these.Stories about meetings and money transfers, etc, are hardly indesputable facts. Were you there? Did you see it happen? Are there pictures of the events taking place? Are there audio recordings of these meetings? Those would be considered indesputable facts. Stuff you read on some website or in the newspaper hardly qualifies.
The pentagon was targeted by a missile and that missile struck an area on the opposite side to where Aschrofts headquaters wereSo you guys really believe this stuff? I mean come on, In a city of millions of people, many tourists with cameras and camcorders, do you really for a second think that the government would take the chance of flying a missile into the pentagon where anyone could see it, snap a picture of it, or take a video it!? Get real. It was broad daylight. But if these are the type of indesputable facts that are out there, I guess you must be right (Actually that's sarcasm. An indisputable fact would be a photo of a US missile flying into the pentagon, but guess what. one doesn't exist. I have [/i]still[/i] yet to see any indesputable proof, only speculation, rumor, and stories).
Countries would eventually disappear, and the world would be ruled by big corporations and company'sEducation and communication would make that outcome unlikely imo. I mean what educated and informed person would stand by for that. I know the wise Spanish would never let such a thing happen to them
It's likely to be ruled by big oil companies since the worlds industries will need it in the for-seeable future.Well why don't all you superior countries full of people so much better, wiser, and more intelligent than Americans, devise inexpensive ways to run all our vehicles and other machines with water, the sun, or some other abundant inexpensive resource? Dont see any wars being fought over the sun or water.
America, a superpower, will eventually crumble.They say nothing lasts forever. I think India has a chance at becomming a superpower, and China could probably take over the world if they wanted to, but I hope people learn to get along together and focus on common goals and beliefs instead of consentrating on differences. Feeding the hungry, healing the sick, educating the unedcated, and making sure everyone is guaranteed their basic human rights should be the goal, imo.
Oh, and what has the perfect government of Spain done to solve the crisis in Palestine? rolls eyes -Hey, maybe little to nothing, but it's still better then encouraging the escalation of the conflict.
it actually made me feel much better about the whole thing.Me as well.
I hope people learn to get along together and focus on common goals and beliefs instead of consentrating on differences. Feeding the hungry, healing the sick, educating the unedcated, and making sure everyone is guaranteed their basic human rights should be the goal, imo.Agreed in full. Maybe some day...
Are you a Spanish citizen? If so, you Spanish murdered, tortured, and enslaved millions of Indians in both South and North America. Try reading a non-Spanish account of what you people did to the Indians, you will find that you "mixed" with a very tiny proportion compared to those you exterminated.Yes I'm sure Kasberg is capable of such horrors....idiot.
I firmly believe that the motive for the orchistration of 9/11 was to enforce the new anti-terror laws and martial lawI partially agree with Jahzel on that, but since I dont live in the States right now, I tend to look at the more global circumstances:
Unknow Genious is implying that there were no Indians in the territory that is now the U.SUm, no. I never suggested that there were no Indians in the US. Is your argument so weak that you need to make stuff up?
Spain only came as far up as Mexico and some of the most southern states. Mmm, they probably used nukes to kill all the indians from New York to Utah, since they were never there.And I never said Spain kiled all the Indians in North America either. Unlike some here, I don't make outragous claims just because they may make my argument seem better. Since you seem to have trouble remembering what I said, here:
And yes, many other European countries also came over and murdered Indians and started wars with them.
It seems you really cant get it in your head that people in Spain dont feel related to those conquerors from 500 years ago.How convenient for you all to so easily be able to wash the blood of millions of innocents off your hands.
Right now we are talking about free people in the US who vote they want their country to go to warYes, you're right. Every man woman and child in America was given a ballot, and we all voted unanimously to kill Iraqi civillians. We're all just as bad as you say we are
I've said before that they offer thousands of dollars if you can prove them wrong (they have a lot of different sources from newsgroups all over the world).Omg, so because you can't prove something false, it must be true?? Think about that premise for a second. OK, I say that the universe is really just some chemical reaction going on in a test tube in some gigantic labratory, JFK was really assasinated by an invisible time traveling robot from the future, and after you die you get reincarnated as an ant, that's why there are so many of them. I'll give you $1,000,000,000 if you can prove me wrong.
idiot... Unknown, your ignorance is laughable. You believe the official line of events which are more paranormal than any UFO sighting, ever!Childish insults, and claiming I that believe something that I never said I believed, makes your argument weaker than it already is. So since you guys' positions are so weak, you have to say I said things that I never said? Sad.
And if you say well there is no evidence to show that 9/11 was an engineered event then your oppinon is based on your own refusal to believe that the government is capable of such horrors.Sorry, I dont follow your logic. How is a lack of proof in any way related to my beliefs about my government (which I never stated, but you seem to have full knowledge of ) All I hear from you are stories and accusations, not one shred of actual proof. If this was a court case, there would have to be a verdict of not guilty, all your "evidence" is circumstantial and full of heresay.
I firmly believe that the motive for the orchistration of 9/11 was to enforce the new anti-terror laws and martial law. (If you cannot see there is a police state then you are blind or foolish).If you can tell me there's a police state in my neighborhood from all the way over there, you got some phenominal eyesight.
The Patriot Act is responsible for the loss of basic human rights in AmericaWhat do you consider basic human rights? I can walk out my front door and scream and curse about the president and the government, and even burn a flag. Will I end up locked up, shot or decapitated? No, I still have my basic human rights, in fact, I have many more rights than just the most basic ones. You need to get outside in the real world more often and take some time off from the internet, you seem to have a very skewed view of reality.
How convenient for you all to so easily be able to wash the blood of millions of innocents off your hands.Not our hands, the hands of the people who went there, stayed there, and are the ancestors of a lot of South Americans, not ours. I hope We dont hear anything else on that subject, I have explained it enough already. If you still dont understand it, I can make a diagram or something, I hope we dont get to that...
and after you die you get reincarnated as an ant, that's why there are so many of them. I'll give you $1,000,000,000 if you can prove me wrongI dont see how those examples relate to anything... We are not talking about comparing speculation with speculation, we are talking about some facts the government has said, which dont match up and are more than very suspcious. Nothing suggests an invissible robot from the future murdered JFK, but there's so much that proves flight 77 didnt crash against the pentagon. There's your answer to that.
I think proof is something that is 100% undisputableThe only 100% undisputable thing we know is that we all eventually die some day. So lets imagine, someone says "A" and some says "B". There are 2 things that might prove "A" is right, but there are 10 things that might prove "B" is right. I dont think that "B" would be 100% undisputable, but al least I'de be much more convinced by "B", simple logic.
If you really see that there is a problem, do something about it, quit throwing rocks at America with one hand and money with the otherWe are doing what we can, but the U.N is manipulated by the U.S
...pictures of missiles hitting the pentagon, recordings of meetings of US officials planning the attacks, etc.I those existed, rest assured that the government would have done everything they could to stop them from reaching the public, its so obvious.
Take the criminals by surprise!( http://www.lego.com/worldcity/default.asp?prodId=7034 )
Stopping crime in World City is easy with a fully equipped Undercover Van and Police 4WD. The undercover policeman catches the crooks in the act from his van, and then the 4WD swoops in to arrest them! Includes 2 vehicles, 2 mini-figures, and accessories.
When the 10-wheeler Surveillance Truck is on the scene, you know the police are on the job! Includes two police agent mini-figures.
Not our hands, the hands of the people who went there, stayed there, and are the ancestors of a lot of South Americans, not ours.So A. no one ever came back from the Americas, and B. all the people who were responsible for the murduring came to America? What about those who were most responsible? What about those who were back in Spain giving the orders? Cmon, get real.
Quote:Well you were the one who tried to help his argument by suggesting that because certain groups offered money if they were proven wrong, this somehow meant that they were right. I was just pointing out the obvious error in your logic.
and after you die you get reincarnated as an ant, that's why there are so many of them. I'll give you $1,000,000,000 if you can prove me wrong
I dont see how those examples relate to anything... We are not talking about comparing speculation with speculation
we are talking about some facts the government has said, which dont match up and are more than very suspcious.If the government is covering up something, just how can you be so damned sure that they're covering up their involvement? Isn't it at least as likely that they're trying to cover up their incompitence in handling the matter? No, that doesn't sound quite as devious, we can't include that posibility.
Nothing suggests an invissible robot from the future murdered JFK, but there's so much that proves flight 77 didnt crash against the pentagon. There's your answer to that.Again, we have different standards for what constitutes proof. I've heard only speculation, but to you, if it says what you want it to, it's proof. You notice I never say "the government's story is proof! But I hear you and the other guy clammering on about all these paranoid stories being proof. Do I need to post the definition of proof for you, or will you please just look it up so you start using the word properly?
There are 2 things that might prove "A" is right, but there are 10 things that might prove "B" is right. I dont think that "B" would be 100% undisputable, but al least I'de be much more convinced by "B", simple logic.Again, your lack of understanding of what the word proof means comes to the surface. I am under the impression that if A contradicts B, and one is proven true, then the other must be false. You are speaking of "things" that prove both A and B true. Understanding what the word proof means, I know that what you suggest is impossible. Your "simple logic" is quite flawed.
We are doing what we can, but the U.N is manipulated by the U.SGreat excuse, but that has nothing to do with the fact that you chose your leaders, and your leaders do tons of business with, and therefore support, the US.
America is a friend, so its really dumb to think the world would stop economic relationships with the country just because of its political decisions.If its political decisions include shitting on the rest of the world and murduring so many innocents just for money, like some have claimed, then why the hell would you support it? I mean, if your "friend" decided to take a shit on your bed, bang your gf, eat all your food, steal your money, and kill your neigbor, would you still support him?
The U.S did that with Iraq, resulting in an economic embargo that has caused the death of more than 500.000 Iraqi children since 1990.I doubt 500,000 American children would die if the rest of the world sent the US a message by restricting trade. The US can produce more food than it needs.
I still prefer American films over Spanish films, so I dont know why I would stop giving my money to American moviemakers, it's not their fault.So if Hitler made great films, you would support him by buying them, but hypocriticaly complain about him too? That proves my point. All some people want to do is blame and complain. If doing something to solve a problem includes the slightest discomfort for them (ie no hollywood movies) then to hell with helping.
Quote:Just how could the government stop 1, 10, or 100 tourists who happened to snap a picture of a missile flying through the streets of downtown Washington DC in broad daylight? Don't you think some of them would have gone straight to the press and given/sold them the pictures and their accounts of what they saw? Or do you think everyone in America calls the government and asks them what they should do every time they walk out of their house?
...pictures of missiles hitting the pentagon, recordings of meetings of US officials planning the attacks, etc.
I those existed, rest assured that the government would have done everything they could to stop them from reaching the public, its so obvious.
Kasberg, theres not even a point in wasting your time with this idiot. I'd would take hundreds of years to wake this guy up. His compartmentalised brain cannot withstand the truth that our government is a lying, c***sucking, murdering, corporate fascist piece of s**t that got away with killing the people that they rule. He's one of these yuppies that thinks that agreeing with government policy and not questioning it will get him a pat on the back - well it doesnt. Wake up fool.Yet another example of how this guy resorts to childish insults and name calling when faced with a rational argument.
Ok, it's getting kind of old and his arguments are always the same: Spanish are murderersNo, I was just using that fact to point out that your country purposely exterminated many millions of innocents just for gold, and you were trying to make the US look like demons for unintentionally possibly killing 15,000 (by your count) innocents. I just wanted you to use a little perspective when criticizing the US. But you missed the whole point and instead you first denied what your country did, then after you realized Spain did[/d] do what I said, you moved towards denying any connection to the people who did it. And actually, very little of my arguments deal with the Spanish murderers, but that's seems to be one of the few points you contend.
Quote:OMG, children are playing cops and robbers! Something has happened since I was a little kid, we NEVER did that! And I guess crime isn't a problem at all, so there's no need to go undercover. I mean criminals are so dumb that they don't try to hide the fact that they're breaking the law, right? If the government was so evil and powerfull, and were trying to keep it a secret from everyone, then why haven' they shut you up? That fact (that you have not been silenced) is the closest thing to proof that I've seen in this entire discussion. And it is very much in line with my feelings that 95% of what you say is nonsense.
Take the criminals by surprise!
Stopping crime in World City is easy with a fully equipped Undercover Van and Police 4WD. The undercover policeman catches the crooks in the act from his van, and then the 4WD swoops in to arrest them! Includes 2 vehicles, 2 mini-figures, and accessories.
What about those who were most responsible? What about those who were back in Spain giving the orders?Absolutist kings giving orders do not represent the will of the Spanish people. Those things happend long ago (your country didnt even exist) and there was no democracy. I insist, people who vote Bush are indeed a bit responsible .Not totally because ignorance and 9/11 thirst for revenge (on who?) plays a part in all of this.
why the hell would you support it? I mean, if your "friend" decided to take a shit on your bed, bang your gf, eat all your food, steal your money, and kill your neigbor, would you still support him?That is not the case since US has not invaded their allies, just their old enemys. And you can see that the new socialist government in Spain pulled the
I doubt 500,000 American children would die if the rest of the world sent the US a message by restricting trade. The US can produce more food than it needs.Yes, the U.S does, but not Iraq. It's a poor country and that's why people can die of hunger. Comparing US food situation with the Iraq situation (which I repeat
So if Hitler made great films, you would support him by buying them, but hypocriticaly complain about him too?I would probably download his films through a p2p network
Absolutist kings giving orders do not represent the will of the Spanish people.You Spanish should have overthrown him right when he started killing people, or as soon as you found out.
Now, seeing a 2,7 meter hole in the walls of a building and no remains whatsoever of a boeing airplane only prove:1.Show me a picture of a 2.7 meter hole in the side of the pentagon. 2. Show me a picture immediatly after the attack where there's no aircraft debris. 3. show me missile debris. 4. The pentagon is not just some random building, it was built to withstand very, very powerful blasts. 5. Crews were cleaning up around it immediately after the attack. Show proof, because repetedly saying you have proof, is not proof.
As you see, A can be right and B can be right as well, one thing doesnt really contradict the other.So what? I said:
I am under the impression that if A contradicts B, and one is proven true, then the other must be false.And we were talking about either proving that an aircraft hit or did not hit the pentagon. So what's your point?
That is not the case since US has not invaded their allies, just their old enemys. And you can see that the new socialist government in Spain pulled theWell then, I still say that you are just as much to blame for whatever the US does as is anyone over here. If you keep rewarding the US by doing business with her, then you are doing absolutely nothing (when you have the power to) to make the US stop.
troops out and has much less political and diplomatic relations with the U.S. Because that's what the people democratically wanted.
Yes, the U.S does, but not Iraq. It's a poor country and that's why people can die of hunger. Comparing US food situation with the Iraq situation (which I repeatYes, of course. Me telling you not to worry about children here starving if you cut off trade to show the US you disapprove of its actions is so arrogant. No, what's arrogant is for you, with all your guilt, to sit there and point the finger at the US, while you do not a damn thing to help all those poor starving helpless innocent iraquis.
the US created) is very arrogant, insulting and sad.
I would probably download his films through a p2p networklol
I dont know what words I've put in your mouth.OK, I'll remind you of a couple things you claim I said or suggest, which I never did:
Unknow Genious is implying that there were no Indians in the territory that is now the U.Sand
there's no 9/11 proof until the White House says soAnd I was including you with the other guy who says the most ignorant stuff.
You have repeatedly said that Spaniards have their hands stained with blood and I've givenNot really. What you've done is provided arguments that help you to rationalize what your people have done so you can not feel so guilty. And like I said a few times, I only brought it up because you were coming accross so "holier than thou" when talking about what the terrible Americans were up to. I just wanted you to use some perspective, but alas, you still miss the point.
you more than enough arguments that prove you wrong.
-Democracy in Iraq is a good thing, specially for the US because it means one less enemyAnd one less problem in the world for the Spanish to do nothing about while they sit back and whine.
-It means American businesses can finally use Iraqi oil fieldsOf course all the Spanish companies will stay out.
Freedom in Iraq is just a side effect of a war for more military and economic power. The government and media want to put it in the spotlightI feel so honored and lucky to be getting lessons on the world and international politics from you. Tell the truth, are you really an ambassador or some kind of secretairy of state? I mean, you know all the answers and have all the facts, you cant just be some teenage kid who's still in high school, right
since it's about the only "good thing" that has happened because of this war.
-Spanish are cool and their hands dont have a trace of blood. Only the basque terrorist ETA group kills (I dont know why some morons in internationalUm, with all the terrorism going on in Spain lately, I think you should worry about what enemies you make, instead of so arrogantly judging the US. You cowered out of your commitments because you didn't want to make the terrorists mad, and now just look at you. You cant go a week without bombs going off or some buildings getting burned down. It's really sad what's happening to your country. But I'll try not to judge you.
press organizations keep calling them separatist when they've killed 817 people)
We've discussed your lesser points, I think I missed the bigger ones? If you can, please state them in an orderly fashion as I just didWell, I'll make my points clearly for you one more time:
with all the terrorism going on in Spain lately, I think you should worry about what enemies you make, instead of so arrogantly judging the US. You cowered out of your commitments because you didn't want to make the terrorists mad, and now just look at you. You cant go a week without bombs going off or some buildings getting burned downLately??? Enemys??? ETA's terrorism has been going on for more than 30 years, no one has attacked the Basque people, so they have no reason or motive whatsoever to kill. We're not talking about insurgents whose relatives have been killed and want to take revenge on the world and blow themselves up, it's a different terrorism.
t's really sad what's happening to your country.I said something like that on september 2001...
last hundreds of years - Bush