That's the downside of digital cameras, they always have an option to automatically handle all that. Takes away the actual skillz involved in taking a nice photo. The effect is that everyone is suddenly a photographer, even though most people don't know the first thing about photography.True. The auto feature takes nice photos sure, but I think great photos come from people who actually experiment with the settings. I want to try and convey a mood, rather than 'a photo of a plant'.
Well, it's not a brick and takes decent pictures for only $300.Dave, face it, you cannot match the quality of a nice D-SLR and you're being pretty narrow-minded about this. And obviously it's not the type of camera you'd buy just for family holiday snaps.
I bought it in 2004.What a difference that makes. Please keep your idiocy out of this thread.
Very sexy.:>
Enough to know that 10MP is a fairly small picture and will produce decent A4 prints and nothing more.True, 3888x2592 may seem large, but it's barely scratching the surface when it comes to professional cameras. The Canon EOS 400D is only an entry level D-SLR.
ive never tried it but i heard if the bsp is over 15 megs it cant be decompiled but who makes a map that big?15mb is actually kind of small for a complete Source map, higher lightmap detail alone can make a bsp huge.