Forum posts
Notice the words placed a few dozen pixels above the image you're referring to.
Thanks for the kind words, guys.
Also, I reprocessed this one to look a bit more natural, and shooped out the annoying discarded chair (???) in the bottom-left corner. Much more satisfied now.
Also, I reprocessed this one to look a bit more natural, and shooped out the annoying discarded chair (???) in the bottom-left corner. Much more satisfied now.
@Crollo: Apparently ImageShack disagrees. I'd prefer a small thumbnail link to what often goes on in these threads, which is the simple embedding of the full-sized image in the post. Seems a bit inconsiderate to those without a speedy connection.
Regardless, it hardly even seems like something worth taking issue with in the first place.
Regardless, it hardly even seems like something worth taking issue with in the first place.
:heart:!
Photo from yesterday.
Thanks 
Because even not too long (<5s) exposures of the sky result in motion-blurred stars.Not really, no. That image's exposure was 20s, f/4, ISO 200. The star trailing is very minimal, only barely noticeable at 100% magnification.
Orion. Obviously.
I'm honored. 
First was shot at a high ISO and was originally underexposed out of the camera anyway. The grain in the second photo is intentional.
Awesome, DiscoStu.
Boomer: Interestingly enough, about a month ago I was with a friend taking shots of the Moon with his telephoto, and when fiddling with them later on in Lightroom we noticed the same exact thing you mentioned.
Looks like he must've screwed around a bit with the colors in that photo as well... we were fairly stoned at the time.
Also, from tonight:
Boomer: Interestingly enough, about a month ago I was with a friend taking shots of the Moon with his telephoto, and when fiddling with them later on in Lightroom we noticed the same exact thing you mentioned.
Looks like he must've screwed around a bit with the colors in that photo as well... we were fairly stoned at the time.
Also, from tonight:
Where is that? It looks wonderful.
We got some snow last night.. made for a beautiful morning.
DiscoStu, I also just got a 50mm f/1.8 Nikon lens recently The first two pictures in my last post were taken with it. Like you said, those lenses are pretty nice.
For the beach photo there I adjusted the exposure a bit in Lightroom, and used Exposure to get a Velvia-type look. I'm quite happy with it, overall. Here's another one from that day:
The first two pictures in my last post were taken with it. Like you said, those lenses are pretty nice.For the beach photo there I adjusted the exposure a bit in Lightroom, and used Exposure to get a Velvia-type look. I'm quite happy with it, overall. Here's another one from that day:
Anyone else catch the eclipse last night?
Thread reminded me of this article.
Thanks, guys.
Unbreakable: nope, no shooping involved. Just luck.
Why not? It's good for you.
Yeah Striker, it's a hobby, but I'm considering maybe turning it into a career. Who knows. I'd always wanted to get into photography, but never really did anything about it until I ran into some money back in February and picked up a Nikon D3000. Not too great of a camera relative to every other DSLR Nikon makes, but it's cheap and certainly gets the job done. All those pictures were taken with that camera and the 18-55mm kit lens it came with.
Nice shot there, by the way. Old electronics FTW.
Nice shot there, by the way. Old electronics FTW.
Thanks guys. The lady's my girlfriend, Tetsu0.
I should probably be sleeping right now.
Nice choice of music there, Strider. 
While I do mostly agree with satchmo, this thread was already over in the first post and the argument lost for him with his unecessary Nazi comparison.
My Ubuntu desktop hasn't really changed much in the past month, so here's my Windows one.
Oh hey Tito, look at the first Google result for "chrome ssl vulnerability".
Yeah, basically the non-technical explanation is your friend is an ass.