WHO LIKES DODGE.
Created 16 years ago2007-12-15 01:55:49 UTC by
seagreen
Created 16 years ago2007-12-15 01:55:49 UTC by
seagreen
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 01:55:49 UTC
Post #240992
WHO LIKES THE DODGE CARS AND TRUCKS. I LIKE THE DODGE VIPER AND DODGE RAM.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 02:06:03 UTC
Post #240993
WHO LIKES A BAN.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 03:37:04 UTC
Post #240995
I PREFER BMW CARS MYSELF I HAS ONE. EAT THAT DODGE. 
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 04:02:45 UTC
Post #240998
Chevy
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 04:07:31 UTC
Post #240999
If I had to choose one of the American car/truck companies it would have to be Ford. Sure, the mustang can't hold it's own against the viper or 'vette, but their trucks win.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 04:40:07 UTC
Post #241000
FUCK YEAH, MOPAR OR GTFO.
Corners? We don't have any God damn corners in America!
Viper Truck (Ram SRT-10) is also win.
Also, Henry Ford was a Nazi. True story.
Viper Truck (Ram SRT-10) is also win.
Also, Henry Ford was a Nazi. True story.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 04:43:43 UTC
Post #241001
I'm a chevy fanatic!
Both my vehicles so far were chevy.
I'm only 19 and had one truck and one car
<3 the F-Series pickups, and the Dodge rams are sexy as hell.
Both my vehicles so far were chevy.
I'm only 19 and had one truck and one car
<3 the F-Series pickups, and the Dodge rams are sexy as hell.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 04:48:35 UTC
Post #241002
I have no problem with Chevy's if they're old and fast, but anything else they make basically turns me off. Of course, anything that isn't fast turns me off anyway.
BTW seagreen is obviously working for Dodge in an effort to appeal to the mapping crowd using viral marketing, BAN BAN BAN.
BTW seagreen is obviously working for Dodge in an effort to appeal to the mapping crowd using viral marketing, BAN BAN BAN.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 05:03:59 UTC
Post #241004
Well I was gonna' close this thread for obvious reasons, but it's sparked some actual discussion. Proceed.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 05:21:34 UTC
Post #241007
dodgy.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 07:59:20 UTC
Post #241015
LOL DODGE.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 08:48:36 UTC
Post #241018
I might've been wrong. >_<
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 10:16:32 UTC
Post #241026
Skoda.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 12:44:39 UTC
Post #241035
I HERD U LIEK IT LOLO.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 12:55:31 UTC
Post #241037
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 13:17:58 UTC
Post #241038
Rickrolling is fail of the highest degree!
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 14:12:37 UTC
Post #241042
i am not much of a dodge person myself. those two cars are the only one's i like from dodge. i agree very much with ford and chevy but if you want to discuss industrial trucks i would say, mack, freight liner and catapiller construction company.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 14:18:06 UTC
Post #241044
Ok........... 
Moving on...
WHO LIKES CHEESE.
Moving on...
WHO LIKES CHEESE.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 14:47:02 UTC
Post #241046
I PREFER A SHARP CHEDDER WITH CRACKERS
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 14:52:05 UTC
Post #241047
I LOVE LAMP
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 15:00:47 UTC
Post #241048
I dislike American Muscle, mainly because of their great lack of efficiency. (Due to lack of electronics and ECU's, etc). They had a race between a modified Ford Mustang with 7.5l engine, and a Jaguar E-type with a 3.5l engine. The Jag SMOKED the Mustang, because of its high power efficiency.
Also, because of the Mustangs backward engineering, when it did a corner it skidded right off and totaled into the side. The Jag cut the corner perfectly.
And I just never liked the styling of American Muscle, I always though it looked very primitive and clunky. I prefer European and Asian cars.
Also, because of the Mustangs backward engineering, when it did a corner it skidded right off and totaled into the side. The Jag cut the corner perfectly.
And I just never liked the styling of American Muscle, I always though it looked very primitive and clunky. I prefer European and Asian cars.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 15:56:51 UTC
Post #241051
lol u guys.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 16:09:46 UTC
Post #241054
I dislike American MuscleWell Athlete, I am glad you're not my girlfriend because I don't go to the gym for nothing.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 16:12:05 UTC
Post #241056
But aren't you italian? xD
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 16:47:16 UTC
Post #241062
Athlete there was no 3.5l Jaguar E-Type. Some had a nice V12 though. LRN2AUTO.
Also, I'd like to see the video or article or whatever it was where this race was documented, because if it was Top Gear I wouldn't trust it for shit. A 3.8l six cylinder engine from that era, European or not, is not going to be so incredibly well engineered that it could overtake a 7.5l Cobra Jet V8 in a straight (or even relatively straight) line. It's totally feasible nowadays, but back then they just hadn't come that far in automotive engineering. The only 7.5l engine Ford had was producing roughly 450 HP, and not even the Jaguar V12 came close to that. The Jaguars from that era were carbureted too, so I don't know what that whole efficiency thing was about...
Also, I'd like to see the video or article or whatever it was where this race was documented, because if it was Top Gear I wouldn't trust it for shit. A 3.8l six cylinder engine from that era, European or not, is not going to be so incredibly well engineered that it could overtake a 7.5l Cobra Jet V8 in a straight (or even relatively straight) line. It's totally feasible nowadays, but back then they just hadn't come that far in automotive engineering. The only 7.5l engine Ford had was producing roughly 450 HP, and not even the Jaguar V12 came close to that. The Jaguars from that era were carbureted too, so I don't know what that whole efficiency thing was about...
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 18:22:11 UTC
Post #241076
I love american muscle cars. They're all about pure power, not like the european and japanese fullofelectricgadgedts-cars. And that sound...V8 rocks. Too bad I'll never have a car like that.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 18:31:51 UTC
Post #241079
Ditto Masta Killa.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 20:24:18 UTC
Post #241086
Yeah i'd like to see proof of that Jag vs Mustang thing.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 20:33:55 UTC
Post #241087
YEAH I AGREE ONE HUNDRED PERCENT, I LOVE AMERICAN MUSCLE CARS FOR THE 60'S I WOULD SAY THE CHEVY IMPALA, THE CHEVY NOVA, GTO, AND THE CORVETTE. FOR THE 70'S KIND OF THE SAME THING. FOR THE 80'S AGAIN CORVETTE, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE DELOREAN AND FOR TODAY, THERE ARE ALOT OF FAST CARS OUT THERE 
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 20:40:20 UTC
Post #241090
D:
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 20:43:10 UTC
Post #241091
FUCK YEAH, NOVA ALSO.
If it's up to me (and it is) that'll be my first car. They can be found dirt cheap.
If it's up to me (and it is) that'll be my first car. They can be found dirt cheap.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 22:24:40 UTC
Post #241099
i'd bet money that it's an existing member just trying to stir some shit. Either way i can't be fucked.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 22:28:19 UTC
Post #241100
well today if you want a truck that is strong and fast check out the dodge ram srt-10 it has a v10 viper engine 500 hp and go up to 160.
price 45.850 us
fuel gas
has a 8.3-liter engine
price 45.850 us
fuel gas
has a 8.3-liter engine
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 22:30:59 UTC
Post #241102
Most of us make about that over the course of never.
Stop trying to sell me stuff.
I'm damn happy with my chevy
Stop trying to sell me stuff.
I'm damn happy with my chevy
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 22:31:35 UTC
Post #241103
lulz. The new and improved seagreen uses no caps at all, and gives us the maximum number on the speedometer instead of the top speed.
YOU'RE GETTING BETTER
YOU'RE GETTING BETTER
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 22:33:34 UTC
Post #241104
i'm not trying to sell you something, just making suggestions.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 22:35:27 UTC
Post #241105
And either getting paid for it, or more likely pretending you are. Why else would anyone post something like this on a frickin' mapping site the first day they signed up? Do we look like likely customers to you, or are you the next generation of the Jimmi clone?
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-15 22:39:47 UTC
Post #241106
hahahahah i do make maps i just like cars.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-16 00:09:27 UTC
Post #241118
Lies.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-16 02:19:08 UTC
Post #241136
no i mod for half life gta vice city and midtown madness 2. 
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-16 02:23:45 UTC
Post #241137
lets!!!! stop this!!
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-16 02:51:39 UTC
Post #241141
...
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-16 03:41:54 UTC
Post #241145
THIS THREAD WENT FROM FAIL TO WIN TO FAIL VERY QUICKLY.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-16 04:37:54 UTC
Post #241162
Whats the point of so much raw power when the speed limit hardly lets you exceed even one tenth of it? And dont suggest breaking the limit, because my brother does that, and has paid THOUSANDS in speeding fines, had his car impounded, and spent a few nights in prison.
And as for "electronic gadgets", it's those electronics that practically double the power output of an engine. On the old mustangs, a huge amount of that power was lost.
And as for "electronic gadgets", it's those electronics that practically double the power output of an engine. On the old mustangs, a huge amount of that power was lost.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-16 05:34:49 UTC
Post #241167
Hahahahahahahah... wow... "double the power output"...
Not only are we talking about frivolous things like GPS and seat warmers when we said electronic gadgets, but your point about EFI doubling the output of engines is just way off mark. I mean, we obviously wouldn't be where we are today in terms of efficiency and reliability if we still used carbureted engines, but you know what'll happen if you hook up an oldish Chevy engine with electronic fuel injection? Well, not much, actually. It produces around the same horsepower and torque as the carbureted one will. Slightly more in some cases, but not much. It's engineering that does it, not strapping a bunch of computers onto the engine. And as I said before, that Jaguar the Mustang went against was carbureted anyway, so your point is moot.
I'm just gonna keep this up because I like arguing about cars.
Not only are we talking about frivolous things like GPS and seat warmers when we said electronic gadgets, but your point about EFI doubling the output of engines is just way off mark. I mean, we obviously wouldn't be where we are today in terms of efficiency and reliability if we still used carbureted engines, but you know what'll happen if you hook up an oldish Chevy engine with electronic fuel injection? Well, not much, actually. It produces around the same horsepower and torque as the carbureted one will. Slightly more in some cases, but not much. It's engineering that does it, not strapping a bunch of computers onto the engine. And as I said before, that Jaguar the Mustang went against was carbureted anyway, so your point is moot.
I'm just gonna keep this up because I like arguing about cars.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-16 09:34:04 UTC
Post #241186
ther is a new cadillac 16 for 2009 or 2010 it has a v16 at 1000 hp.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-16 09:41:44 UTC
Post #241188
I got 1 dodge viper vs ford gt they both have 500 hp but i think it would be the ford.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-17 00:51:37 UTC
Post #241287
The only advantage of Fuel injected versus Carburetor is a cold start, and it's harder to run an electronic System thru a carb.
And for the viper vs the ford.
Viper has ford for straights, but sucks on cornering. So it depends if you're doing a drag or a street course.
Then you have to factor in gear ratios for drags, or suspension/ chamber angle for street courses.
And for the viper vs the ford.
Viper has ford for straights, but sucks on cornering. So it depends if you're doing a drag or a street course.
Then you have to factor in gear ratios for drags, or suspension/ chamber angle for street courses.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-17 02:07:37 UTC
Post #241311
The only advantage of Fuel injected versus Carburetor is a cold start, and it's harder to run an electronic System thru a carb.No... no that's not the only advantage. It's a far more precise fuel delivery system than a carburetor, meaning the engine runs more efficiently, more reliably, has far better throttle response, and can reach its full potential with the correct air-fuel ratio. It can also be quickly tuned and adjusted with a laptop. But that's not to say it would double the power of any car.
Also, American cars simply can't turn well, period. Even I admit that. All our sports cars use dated suspension systems, and have trouble maneuvering.
Posted 16 years ago2007-12-17 05:31:56 UTC
Post #241317
EFI has nothing to do with engine power; it's, as mentioned, just a better way of delivering fuel to the engine. It's also better for vehicles in places like Colorado that are always freezing as balls during the winter, like right now.
You must be logged in to post a response.