And I still think links should open new windows. I think it used to, or I'm used to other forums, but I keep forgetting it's the same window and end up closing it.
At least make it a profile option for it to be a new window, same window, or new tab.
TWHL3: The Buglist
Created 16 years ago2008-02-23 06:06:40 UTC by
AJ
Created 16 years ago2008-02-23 06:06:40 UTC by
AJ
Posted 16 years ago2008-02-29 22:20:54 UTC
Post #246911
Posted 16 years ago2008-02-29 22:22:56 UTC
Post #246912
1. not needed and they wouldn't be 'recent posts' if we missed some of the recent ones out.
2. definitely not. if they want to contact the MV mods, they can use the 'contact us' page.
3. already there.
4. links shouldn't be bigger, and the brown doesn't suit the new colour scheme.
luke: I'd love for links to open in new windows, but I can't. Blame Ant, if anyone, for making TWHL XHTML strict, and not transitional.
2. definitely not. if they want to contact the MV mods, they can use the 'contact us' page.
3. already there.
4. links shouldn't be bigger, and the brown doesn't suit the new colour scheme.
luke: I'd love for links to open in new windows, but I can't. Blame Ant, if anyone, for making TWHL XHTML strict, and not transitional.
Posted 16 years ago2008-02-29 22:28:02 UTC
Post #246913
Stupid Ant.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 01:35:12 UTC
Post #246919
You can just hit CTRL before clicking a link, and in Firefox it pops into a new tab.
And With the PM thingy. I'm having a hard time telling which PM has been viewd, replied to, or is new.
And With the PM thingy. I'm having a hard time telling which PM has been viewd, replied to, or is new.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 01:36:20 UTC
Post #246920
Or Middle-Click. Much easier. =]
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 02:51:21 UTC
Post #246927
unread PMs have a blue background. how can you miss it?
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 03:04:03 UTC
Post #246928
where?
The top message is new, the rest have been read.
The top message is new, the rest have been read.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 03:05:21 UTC
Post #246929
I suppose that I should ask if you are colour blind?
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 03:07:43 UTC
Post #246930
LOL i have to go to the doctor cuz they all look the same to me!?
: /
(maybe cuz i'm running at 1900 x 1200?)
: /
(maybe cuz i'm running at 1900 x 1200?)
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 03:12:02 UTC
Post #246931
your resolution has nothing to do with it. open the image in photoshop or something that will tell you the RGB values of the backgrounds of the rows of the list.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 03:28:12 UTC
Post #246933
Maybe you all could look at this and see if someone else besides me can't see the color difference?! I'm seriously worried something is wrong... maybe my screen is dying lawl.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 03:56:30 UTC
Post #246935
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 04:06:25 UTC
Post #246936
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 04:10:23 UTC
Post #246937
I see it fine.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 04:27:49 UTC
Post #246938
Nooooo!!! Mine eyes are blinding!
:'( '' ''''' '''' ' ' '
:'( '' ''''' '''' ' ' '
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 04:56:17 UTC
Post #246939
Its your screen.
PB: I vote we change to Transistional. Just change the Doctype.
PB: I vote we change to Transistional. Just change the Doctype.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 05:03:50 UTC
Post #246940
leaving it as it is. if a user wants a new window, they can middle-click the link. but there is no way to force it to not open in a new window, and that is annoying.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 07:04:39 UTC
Post #246941
Forcing a new window removes user control and should be avoided.I bet someone really smart said that, listen to him/her.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 07:37:32 UTC
Post #246942
My eyes are fucked.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 11:49:15 UTC
Post #246960
Well i can see them now. Maybe it was just a bit too subtle to pick-up without knowing it was there.
If that makes any sense, I don't know.
If that makes any sense, I don't know.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 20:17:52 UTC
Post #246976
I guess it's not a bug, but still.
I think it should be more obvious when your PM box is full.
Mine has been full for a little while now and I didn't notice until I was about to compose a PM and it said "you are not allowed to compose a PM until you empty your PM box" or something like that.
There should be something similar to old TWHL when that red thing poped up on the high edge of the screen saying "it's full, clean it up".
Cuz, I don't really count my PMs, and I don't think anybody else does either.
I think it should be more obvious when your PM box is full.
Mine has been full for a little while now and I didn't notice until I was about to compose a PM and it said "you are not allowed to compose a PM until you empty your PM box" or something like that.
There should be something similar to old TWHL when that red thing poped up on the high edge of the screen saying "it's full, clean it up".
Cuz, I don't really count my PMs, and I don't think anybody else does either.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 20:40:58 UTC
Post #246980
you can still receive PM's when the inbox is past the limit, and the message is apparent when you try to compose a message ;P
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-01 20:48:53 UTC
Post #246983
Oh.
Well then it makes sense!
That's an improvement actually, nice idea.
Well then it makes sense!
That's an improvement actually, nice idea.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-02 00:09:35 UTC
Post #247005
When you click threads when looking at the forum list, I think it should bring you to the last page.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-02 09:08:23 UTC
Post #247027
When you click threads when looking at the forum list, I think it should bring you to the last page.I think that it should bring you to the first one. But, there should be also a link that brings you to the last post.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-02 09:10:15 UTC
Post #247028
I agree with luke, but both would be cool if it was done in a straightforward way.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-02 09:15:53 UTC
Post #247031
You do realise there's a little arrow that takes you to the latest post, right?
Perhaps it should be more noticable.. but a link is definately there.
Perhaps it should be more noticable.. but a link is definately there.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-02 09:24:08 UTC
Post #247032
Those small errors are really really small.
Should be bigger and more noticeable IMO
Should be bigger and more noticeable IMO
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-02 10:21:10 UTC
Post #247039
Ant/Penguinboy:
You're were right! A long time back I adjusted my contrast/brightness/gamma gfx card settings to and that was the whole problem! (setting back to defaults make those pm highlights clear as my stupidity!)
I'm sorry for causing the debacle and dramatizing that I was going blind!
Please allow me to attempt to pwn myself with this hastily created anti-award:
The-anti-award-that-shall-not-be-named.
You're were right! A long time back I adjusted my contrast/brightness/gamma gfx card settings to and that was the whole problem! (setting back to defaults make those pm highlights clear as my stupidity!)
I'm sorry for causing the debacle and dramatizing that I was going blind!
Please allow me to attempt to pwn myself with this hastily created anti-award:
The-anti-award-that-shall-not-be-named.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-02 10:39:41 UTC
Post #247042
You do realise there's a little arrow that takes you to the latest post, right?Reading through Luke's comment i assumed that there is none. And didn't check it myself. Sorry.
The arrow is perfectly visible, no need to make it more noticeable.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-02 11:18:04 UTC
Post #247044
I'm not so sure myself, we've had a few people comment on them before with TWHL2, and the TWHL3 one isn't much better. I'll discuss it with the others.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-02 17:27:15 UTC
Post #247061
No no no.
When looking at the FORUMS list, like site suggestions / general discussion / etc. When you click on the name of the thread under the forum name, it brings you to the first post.
When looking at the FORUMS list, like site suggestions / general discussion / etc. When you click on the name of the thread under the forum name, it brings you to the first post.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-02 17:34:09 UTC
Post #247062
OH. good point.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-03 03:07:26 UTC
Post #247088
Are there plans to do a post preview like for PMs?
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-03 03:48:08 UTC
Post #247089
i don't think so. i put in the PM preview because you can't see it after you send it. everything else you can.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-04 10:02:32 UTC
Post #247156
When I search for things on the forums etc. It shows entries on Admin only threads. I don't know if it was like this on the old TWHL but it's kind of annoying going into a likely looking thread, then being told that I'm not authorised to view them.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-04 16:25:22 UTC
Post #247165
i thought i fixed that....
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-07 18:07:54 UTC
Post #247353
The 'language spoken' area of the profile isn't displayed when viewing profiles, even when filled out.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-07 19:38:20 UTC
Post #247356
read the first post again
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-07 20:39:19 UTC
Post #247360
More of a suggestion:
We have journal comments, why not make the same for news posts?
We have journal comments, why not make the same for news posts?
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-07 20:41:51 UTC
Post #247361
read the first post againIt's not addressed.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-07 21:49:37 UTC
Post #247374
read harder
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-08 09:53:25 UTC
Post #247402
Are there plans to do a post preview like for PMs?I dunno, i love this feature for PMs, it saves me 20 edits and waiting for TWHL to load, which leads me to my next suggestion which really isn't a bug, but a trouble just the same:
i don't think so. i put in the PM preview because you can't see it after you send it. everything else you can.
I think this has been mentioned and quashed, but I think it would be great to create a paypal account with a goal to meet for more bandwith... this site loads so slow, the interpolice will pull you over = ) (it's better than ads too imo)
I'll donate, and i'm sure others would too. you could choose to do so anonymously or creditied, even give a little commendation for sponsors, but I'm not sure. you could use extra funds for compo gifts lawl.
ok i'll shut it now = )
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-08 10:19:50 UTC
Post #247403
i cannot change the hosting without changing the url of the site and deleting all users and content.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-08 10:25:57 UTC
Post #247405
Copy paste.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-08 10:32:07 UTC
Post #247406
I'll do everything one entry at a time......that's over a million fields of text XD
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-08 10:34:42 UTC
Post #247408
Why one at a time? You can make a backup copy of the db and save it to a text file.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-08 10:36:02 UTC
Post #247409
i was being sarcastic ;p
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-08 10:37:10 UTC
Post #247410
Didn't notice that.
Posted 16 years ago2008-03-08 11:24:43 UTC
Post #247411
Sarcasm is a privilege, not a right. = >
You must be logged in to post a response.