Compile Problem (too lazy)
Created 20 years ago2004-05-07 07:14:34 UTC by
twain088
Created 20 years ago2004-05-07 07:14:34 UTC by
twain088
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-07 07:14:34 UTC
Post #25887
I gotta a problem, is there any way to speed up the compile process. I'm using what came with worldcraft 2.1, i guess i have to upgrade to Hammer 3.4. but are there any programs to help speed it up or do it instead of worldcraft?
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-07 07:34:02 UTC
Post #25889
I guess you hafta get the latest versions... :
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-07 07:40:08 UTC
Post #25892
So you use the old compile programs, QRAD, Qblablabla and so.
Get Zoner's Half-Life Tools (ZHLT) here:
http://collective.valve-erc.com/index.php?go=mhlt
Get Zoner's Half-Life Tools (ZHLT) here:
http://collective.valve-erc.com/index.php?go=mhlt
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-07 08:43:30 UTC
Post #25911
No.
Just make sure you got it checked on fast compile and also a lot of people say (i dont really give a fck but) that HLCC is best at compiling as its fast and has lots of compiling options. But I mean, I've used it but it all seems to much of a hassle to me.
Just make sure you got it checked on fast compile and also a lot of people say (i dont really give a fck but) that HLCC is best at compiling as its fast and has lots of compiling options. But I mean, I've used it but it all seems to much of a hassle to me.
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-07 08:59:09 UTC
Post #25913
HLCC is a Batch Compiler I believe. And no, updating your tools wont speed up compiling times. Buying more RAM might help a bit. I just use ZHLT 2.5.3 (custom build), the good `ol default compile tools. HLCC, like Jahzel said, is way to much of a hassle for me - and using any of ZHLT's GUI compilers is damn near confusing.
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-07 09:39:21 UTC
Post #25921
im using nems batch compiler. simple and quik. the only bad thing is it uses a .map foile for compiling.
adn LOL you run xp on 48mb ram!!! get 98se on it again becasue xp lows way to much down
adn LOL you run xp on 48mb ram!!! get 98se on it again becasue xp lows way to much down
Posted 20 years ago2004-05-07 14:01:30 UTC
Post #25951
Yes, it is, immediately. Even if you map on the olde one, compile on the damn new one!
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-07 22:26:46 UTC
Post #26007
but i doesnt work on the new comp, it comes up with an error when i want to compile. And doesnt let me select things in the 3D view.
I wanted to know if these errors were occuring because i was running windows Xp with worldcraft 2.1? I know the RAM's fine, 256mb.
Pepper, you miss understood my question, my old computer in running windows 98 with 48mb RAM, and my new computer is running Xp with 256.
I wanted to know if these errors were occuring because i was running windows Xp with worldcraft 2.1? I know the RAM's fine, 256mb.
Pepper, you miss understood my question, my old computer in running windows 98 with 48mb RAM, and my new computer is running Xp with 256.
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-07 23:38:33 UTC
Post #26010
Download the latest ver. of hammer, and Zoner's Half-Life Tools and it should run fine on windows xp.... (well it does for me 
oh yer.... forget trying to map on a computer with 48mb ram, use it for a paper weight, or maybe a footrest.
oh yer.... forget trying to map on a computer with 48mb ram, use it for a paper weight, or maybe a footrest.
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-08 01:58:16 UTC
Post #26014
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-08 04:34:55 UTC
Post #26018
ho srry i missunderstood. my old computer has 96mb ram for compiling. although wihtout lights and a simple map took me already 1.30 minutes ot compile . now max 10 secs wiht a light. how 1024mb ram can help you 
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-08 06:30:31 UTC
Post #26021
Well now up graded to Hammer 3.4 and its much better than Worldcraft 2.1. It also works on my new computer and now takes only a few minutes to compile, unlike like the old 30 to an hour to compile. I dont miss that.
Thanks to everyone that helped!
Thanks to everyone that helped!
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-08 09:37:03 UTC
Post #26037
Should I still be using Worldcraft? because there seems t be much newer versions of Hammer out there. But I dont like Hammer that much.
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-08 09:56:54 UTC
Post #26042
Start using Hammer. It IS better than WorldCraft. In fact, it's just a newer version of WorldCraft but it switched name after I guess v3.3
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-08 11:05:12 UTC
Post #26048
Worldcraft dude, if you switch to Hammer, will you also change your name to Hammer dude?
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-08 11:21:39 UTC
Post #26055
worldcraft dude. two words: (no four words actually 
)
Get hammer you ass!
)Get hammer you ass!
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-08 11:54:47 UTC
Post #26072
NEVA! MUAHAHAHAHAHH! besides, I have hammer, and its too diffeent from Worldcraft for me to switch. I guess I'll just be the Old Skool mapper from now on. The only guy at TWHL to use WOrldcraft AND Q tools throughout his entire mapping career!
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-08 12:13:12 UTC
Post #26075
Seventh, have this guy crucified for blasphemy.
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-09 02:20:35 UTC
Post #26142
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-09 03:00:05 UTC
Post #26144
let me gues. windows 3.11 is the newest version for you??
whilst we are at longhorn he is at 98
whilst we are at longhorn he is at 98
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-09 11:54:37 UTC
Post #26185
WorldcraftDude - Hammer is the same freaking thing There really is no difference between them other than people say "Hammer runs better " or something like that which I have not expierenced.
There really is no difference between them other than people say "Hammer runs better " or something like that which I have not expierenced.
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-09 12:14:52 UTC
Post #26198
WorldCraft Dude, I got to say one thing (aaaaaaaaaagh!) whats the matter with you? You really need to vistit this place if you think that worldcraft is better! hammer is thee one to use as it has many improvments that help alot during mapping etc.
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-09 15:45:49 UTC
Post #26223
Well theres more stuff to mess with in hammer. And I like the simplicity of Worldcraft. But no I DONT use Windows 95. I got XP
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-09 15:55:09 UTC
Post #26226
If you're not able to adapt to newer tools, it's gonna be a worse mapping career... HL2's editor will be totally off-world to you...
But if you wish to do so, that's OK by me...
But if you wish to do so, that's OK by me...
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-09 19:27:15 UTC
Post #26255
MMMMM WORLDCRAFT DUDE.....
didnt you repair the Fred Flinstone pc...ohhh yea...it was you!...
so....you surely use "coo edit 1", winamp 1 beta, nero 1.2 arent?
uuuuhhh let me see....yeah! you use the f*** old worldcraft too!..
you are a fosil!......
great guy!
didnt you repair the Fred Flinstone pc...ohhh yea...it was you!...
so....you surely use "coo edit 1", winamp 1 beta, nero 1.2 arent?
uuuuhhh let me see....yeah! you use the f*** old worldcraft too!..
you are a fosil!......
great guy!
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-09 21:03:36 UTC
Post #26256
Its has a much Better GUI (graphics user interface) also, or so ive found, it also has much better tools such as with applying textures, instead of streching it yourself too make it fit on a door or some thing, you can just use the "fit" button and it does it for you, no more wasted time!!
Make the switch! I did and discovered it was well worth it!
Make the switch! I did and discovered it was well worth it!
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-10 18:32:44 UTC
Post #26383
OK, this is how it goes down yo foo dawgs in da hiz house. I use Worlcraft, q tools, and cs 1.5. Those are the only non updated things I use. I have everything else up to date, Winamp, Media Player, McAffe. KAZAA LITE FOOS. IM A PIRATE ARR!
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-10 18:37:30 UTC
Post #26385
Just Make the switch and become hammer dude, you'll enjoy mapping much more, i guarantee it!!
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-10 18:39:07 UTC
Post #26387
Yo yo yo dawg? What be up wit you dawg? What if mah passion is Worldcraft dawg? Don be takin' dat way 'bout mah momma foo! I bust you up!
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-10 18:50:42 UTC
Post #26391
Search for a program called "Batch Compiler" - it seems faster even using the Zoner's tools
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-11 07:34:28 UTC
Post #26441
sorry if i'm repeating, but i can't be bothered reading all the posts...
es:
That's because you get more feedback form the dos window than the Hammer compile window
And Batch Compiler isn't a Compiler - its a front end
Its a better option because you can use -estimate, very handy switch
And there is NO speed reduction
es:
That's because you get more feedback form the dos window than the Hammer compile window
And Batch Compiler isn't a Compiler - its a front end
Its a better option because you can use -estimate, very handy switch
And there is NO speed reduction
Posted 19 years ago2004-05-11 11:45:25 UTC
Post #26512
I think what esmajor meant is that maps compile quicker through batch compilers than in Hammer. This is obviously true (as long as you don't leave Hammer open unnecessarily) as it will free up a fair amount of system resources.
You must be logged in to post a response.