You guys are neither as funny, nor as sarcastic as you seem to think you are.We are to each other, and, er, I'm pretty sure I speak for us all when I say "who cares whether Americans get it?".
sarcasm tags are for people who dont undestand sarcasmYeah :|.
In fact, any kind of analyst who is paid to predict something unpredictable like Stocks, Bonds, the price of Gold, or anything else, are said to be experts, but apparently since they have not been through what they are predicting, nobody should trust their opinions on what will happen.I like that example :).
30*24 = 720Never heard of "appropriate significant figures", boy? If you're going to quote a figure to... billionths, I'd expect a better value for hours/day than 24.
1006/720 = 1.397222222
Unless you can think of yourself as a "lump of cells" or a means to reduce the world's overpopulation, then how can you say it about someone else?Of course we are. We're just animals.
I should've edited the wikipedia article so you thought it was caused by gremlins hording too much gold in the reactor coreHaha, kick-arse.
"St. John's Wood."Wow, I'd never realised how funny that one is. My great-aunt lives there.
On Abortions: I think that as soon as it has its own DNA, it is a new organism.So, er, when the egg is fertilised, then. You seriously consider a single cell to have the same rights, responsibilities, et c., as a newborn baby (steering clear of the in-between bits for a mo')?
Explain, I have never gotten an explanation to this. Its never been used on me so I never cared what it meant. Must be something good though cause I have seen it used a bunch.You know, like "rascal". Surely you know what "cheeky" means?
b) I am new here?I can't see what either of those have to do with fundamental browser functionality ;).
c) Because the layout of the site is backward to my expectations?
I don't like the tone in that sentence...It's not clear whether he meant "they are not permitted to add anything" or "they might not add anything".
Ad hominem - Latin for against the man. It is an attack on the person(s) rather than the argument or issue at hand. Also known as character assasination, it is a logical fallacy that renders one's argument invalid. One will often to resort to this if they feel their argument is too weak to persuade people by itself.Er, the random insult and argument were clearly seperated. I didn't use it as the basis of any points of argument, so it's not ad hominem. That is the term I wanted, though.
So, in a sense, calling our fellow debaters "pigfuckers" is an example of ad hominem. All I have to say is shame on you, Seventh. You of all people should know better.