Well, I never flamed or spammed anyone. Just argued, usually not so intensely.Calling people stupid, idiot, jackass, and any other insults are considered flaming. You don't do it all the time, but I don't think anyone can truthfully say that they've never spammed or flamed.
@ point 1: If you mean ignore all the people who are ruining this place right now, then no, I'm not going to do that.I don't think he was trying to say that, per-se. And even if he was, he still has something of a point. Flaming and spamming are no way to deal with people, it's like going to mayor's office and screaming at him for building a wal-mart in your small rural town, if anything it'll just piss him off.
This might have been good, were it not for members like dave.Come now, you can't hate him so much that you think he's the source of all our problems? Use your brain, Hunter.
anyway, its kind of hard to ignore srrys posts, as they are everywhereCan't argue with that.
ahhhh, so it just come down to matter of opinion eh?How about we drop it now and stop driving this thread further and further off topic.
"If you dont have anything good to say dont say anything""Good" is often relative, srry probably thinks that thread is a spammy load of crap. So saying it should be ended is "good" from his point of view.
I hate explaining jokesDon't bother, because
We tried not to force our opinions, but when you guys came across calling us fools, we couldn't call ourselves men if we would let it slide by unchallenged.Just look at the first page, Doc. Playbus challenged Jazel's opinion and Jahzel's response was to call him a bootlicker. So tell me, was he only trying to present his opinion or force it? Standing up to criticism makes you more of a man than insulting those who challenge you.
We had to defend our opinions. Because we cared. Because we wanted you to see what we had seen.Once again, insulting people is not the best way to defend an opinion.
But you ignored it and said there was no way it could be true.In the words of several people:
...In principle, I actually agree with you on much of what you say about the state of the world.
My post wasn't to say that your theories are totally wrong...
I'm not saying any of your theories or world views are downright wrong...
I don't disagree with your views...
I don't necessarily believe in what the government feeds us...And last of all I'd like to point out how ironic your post is. You say we unjustly called you fools, but when we merely disagreed with you you wrote a three paragraph speech calling us fools. You say we ignored what you said, but when we try to refute you practically word for word you don't listen.
With all these ideas you'd think one would make it.The creative process is like life; full of hopes and dreams that that are too ambitious and end far too quickly.
If you want to keep your head stuck in the sand, that's your choice.My post wasn't to say that your theories are totally wrong, that's just how arguments go when you and Jazel are in them.
You know, Jahzel is only trying to help. That's all. He's someone in the crowd who is shouting: "HEY LOOK OUT, THERE'S A CAR COMING TOWARDS US OUT OF CONTROL! IT'S GOING TO HIT US IF WE DON'T WATCH OUT!"And at this point the crowd starts debating whether or not the car even exists, Jazel cites some obscure news sites, yells out some propaganda about American rights, and everyone gets rather huffy about everything. As all this happens the imagined "car" is still crawling towards them. Eventually everyone but Jazel gets hungry or bored and goes off to find some snacks, no side having proven anything.
Look. If I believe in one conspiracy theory, I have to believe all of them...By that logic, if you believe that the US government had something to do with 9/11, then you must also believe the Apollo Moon-Landing Hoax Theory, the New World Order conspiracy, the Jewish or Zionist global domination conspiracy theories, and the Paul is Dead conspiracy .
why is it so bad to wax a ledge and skate it? destroying public/private property you say? what about all the land they destroyed building it onI think the reason anti-skating laws were invented is because it puts the people around the skaters at risk. Boards flying (or rolling or whatever) off and hitting someone, people bailing into someone, skating into someone. My advice to any city with a skating problem: Build a nice skate park. It helped loads where I live.
I rolled out a double and now I have to eat that hamburger of yours.. so I better take a shortcut to the nearest corner store and grab some paper bags.But under the Prosser revision of 1923 you can't eat the burger on account of the conditional Cobble Road Bonus, and the fact that you've eaten far too much as it is.
references to obscure television shows dont belong here.It's from BBC RADIO 4
