Nintendo rule the handheld console market. The sooner other companies realise that the sooner we can get all this extra bullshit off the shelves.Yeah, you're right. And I guess since Microsoft currently dominates the operating system market everyone else should just give up trying to create a better OS, right? As much as I love my DS, competition is always a good thing.
And please don't mention Nickeplate, the guy's a dick.I suppose that's why basically every single one of #twhl's old regulars moved into the other channel with the exception of you Penguinboy and Ant... you guys are the only ones who've ever had a problem with him. Anyway it's a tired argument, this happened what, a year and a half ago? People need to stop holding grudges over retarded shit.
#ifdef WIN32
#include <windows.h>
#define Sleep(x) Sleep((x)*1000)
#else
#include <unistd.h>
#define Sleep(x) sleep((x))
#endif
You'll have to specify the time in seconds instead of milliseconds though. Not that this little app needs to be cross-platform anyway, but just for future reference.I was thinking about this the other day; why not convert my Compilator and my Half-Life Launch Pad to C# code instead, because i've heard its faster.Not really, no. C# and VB.NET offer pretty much identical performance since they're both compiled down to the same CIL code. The real choice you're making is to use the .NET framework; choosing between C# and VB.NET is really a matter of personal taste. To be honest Muzz, I don't see the point in converting your app to a language you're not comfortable with and possibly introducing new bugs in the process just to appease the C# evangelists ( ). You won't make it run any faster, the code will be harder to maintain, and the end-user won't even know the difference.
the world doesn't need another browser.Why not? More competition is always good for the end-user. And after reading that little comic thing Google released and trying it myself, I'm actually pretty excited about Chrome.